What do you think of Canon takes portraits, Nikon shoots landscapes ?

Could it be that so many people usually go straight out of jpg? Does anyone know what RAW is for? What is yellow or not, really use Nikon's raw to do it in the later stage, you will know that Canon is garbage, what era, the problem of yellow is not yellow is still discussed, isn't tolerance as important as the color cast?

If you want to have a small contrast, shoot people softly, what kind of SLR to play, now grab a mobile phone and take a picture plus destroy the picture Xiuxiu will grind the skin and it will be over, isn't it softer than Canon? If you insist that photographers rely on shooting technology, just press the shutter to produce blockbusters, and do post-production is garbage, then when I didn't say what I said above, you still insist on jpg straight out, and continue to praise Canon's stinky feet!

The Canon feels much better to operate than the Nikon. After several years of development, neither brand is as extreme as it is said. After a little bit of post-processing, Canon shoots landscapes, and Nikon shoots portraits very well.

Compared with Nikon, Canon has the following advantages: quality control, direct color, lens group, and after-sales system.

Personally, I think that the materials used in the production of the lens lenses of the two brands are different, and the body is not much different.

That's why NASA has been using Nikon for a long time, and Canon can take a picture of a small Japanese fresh earth.

I buy what is cheap, I don't dwell on that, in my heart these are all garbage, if you have money, you can go directly to Hasselblad or Phase One.

I don't know how to pretend to understand nonsense.

In the digital age, the differences between Canon and Nikon are shrinking, and if you are familiar with the camera setup, you can completely interchange the wind imaging style to a large extent.

But if you go straight out of the ** not later, the portrait Canon scenery Nikon is definitely the right choice.

Turnips and cabbages have their own love.

You guys are also discussing this, Sony has been fully Canon Nikon!

We are a commercial studio, ** mostly. Canon Nikon Sony is using it, and when you live less, you still have time to do post-production for Nikon Sony, but if you live more, you like to use Canon, and it will save a lot of time in the later stage. But the demanding work has to be Sony + exquisite late stage.

Now**The application is very wide, and everything is talked about with the introduction, and many places such as the Circle of Friends applet support the **class of communication, and the static ** is being squeezed more and more, and Nikon's defects in ** appear to be getting bigger and bigger.

After more than ten years of Nikon imaging, Nikon imaging is indeed yellowish and white, and the balance is really not very good! In 2018, I decided to abandon all Nikon equipment and switch to Canon, and suddenly it became clear that it was no longer difficult to use, no longer worried about white balance, no longer worried about color casts, Canon has a trick to adjust the color, which is to increase saturation** and immediately become good-looking, but Nikon seems very timid and cold, because Nikon's color temperature is cold and glamorous, and Canon is warm, and only those who have used it understand the subtle changes in it