Please help translate a paragraph of law professional Chinese into English

This is a direct translation or other software, and the legal text is like this:

In determining the timing of parenting and making decisions, the court cannot take into account that a party's conduct does not affect its relationship with the child, nor can it assume that either party is better able to serve the best interests of the child by reason of its gender.

The previous article is like this:

In the allocation of decision-making responsibilities between the parties, according to the corresponding provisions (which may be foreign), the court shall base the best interests of the child on the basis of the corresponding provisions. In determining the best interests of the child for this purpose, the court shall take into account, in addition to factors relating to the duration of childcare, the following:

1) Reliable evidence of the parties' ability to cooperate and make joint decisions;

2) whether the manner in which the parties concerned with children have been engaged in the past reflect a system of values, time commitment, and mutual support, which demonstrates the ability to build positive and beneficial relationships with children as co-decision-makers;

3) Whether the allocation of shared decision-making responsibilities on any one or more issues will promote more frequent or sustained contact between the child and the parties.

In determining the timing of parenting and making decisions, the court cannot take into account that a party's conduct does not affect its relationship with the child, nor can it assume that either party is better able to serve the best interests of the child by reason of its gender.

The decision to determine Wu Yao's time and Wu's decision-making power is that the court cannot think that Party B's behavior does not affect the relationship between the party and the child, and the court cannot do so. Traceless Gender Two speculates that this person is better able to serve the best interests of the child.

Tort refers to civil, non-criminal wrongful acts, excluding breach of contract. The tort causes a person who has suffered an injury or loss to claim damages from the infringer. The law of torts is based on the conclusions of court cases. Infringement includes the following:

--Negligence or negligence Breach of duty or duty of caretaker, causing the applicant (claimant) to suffer continuous injury or loss;

Talking about tort liability, the reward is too small, give a high point, help you turn over.

Lazy·· After graduation, you are a salesman, and I guess no one will invite you.

Classification of criminal offenses.

There are generally three categories of criminal offenses. Summary offenses, tried without a jury, means that minor offences are tried only in a local court (in China, a civil court). An indictable offence is a serious offence, such as a ** offence, which can only be tried in public in the (UK) Criminal Court.

An official document that contains a fact-based charge of a crime is called an indictment. There are also crimes that can be tried in local courts as well as in criminal courts, such as theft and robbery. If the defendant appeals, the District Court may pronounce the sentence on the spot or transfer the sentence to the Criminal Court, which may impose a more severe sentence.

If there is no request for appeal, the court may decide at its discretion the manner in which the penalty is to be imposed. The defendant may request a jury to impose a sentence, and if granted, such a sentence shall be imposed by the criminal court.

The third feature.

Environmental law, which is legal, not a fact, is characteristic.

Environmental requirements are few, if any, in isolation.

International legal perspectives. In other words, environmental law parameters.

Will it almost always involve arguing about other substantive areas.

Law. Other such areas include the issue of ** agreements in the context of the WTO, human rights norms before human rights tribunals, and general international law.

The relationship or legal context between the treaty and the customization.

State and Legal Liability. This combination indicates the most intense.

An international tribunal composed entirely of international experts.

Environmental law may also not be very good in attractive situations. Therefore, what is needed is a physical judge in general and professionally.

It also explains why no cases have been submitted to the International Tribunal to date in the Environment Chamber, and in my opinion, why two countries have not done so: without consent, a given dispute is essentially "environmental".

The former problem of the global body than the regional body, is.

There is no common appreciation in the international community.

Environmental goals stand in law and politics.

There are understandable differences of opinion between developed and developing countries.

What should be the national priority, and it's clear that these things will also extend to the bench. There are equally sharp differences.

Opinions between different regions, between developed countries in the house.

The example of the current GMO debate shows that German judges are more likely to be "preventive" than a risk aversion

American judges?