Why do some people who do good deeds in today s society regard them as enemies?

I think for example, the incident of helping the elderly, in case of an accident, it is obviously a good thing, but it becomes a bad thing. ‍‍

I didn't lend money to my friend to persuade him to stay away from gambling, but he not only didn't listen but blocked me.

So that's the terrible thing about it now, so much so that many people don't dare to help others, not because they don't want to, but because they really don't dare.

I think this kind of thing is normal, but as long as we have the right mentality, it's okay, because only when the mentality is right, all misunderstandings and troubles will be gone, and enemies will become friends.

I think that some people in the current society are like this, because they don't know how to change themselves, they don't know how to thank others, but more often than not, the current society is too prone to misunderstanding, so it will deepen into enemies.

It may be that you are doing things in an inappropriate way, or that others have misunderstood what you are doing.

Because some people have an improper mentality, it is like a dog biting Lu Dongbin who does not know the truth of good people.

I think a lot of people are not really in difficulty, there are still a lot of people begging on the street, many of these people are not really incapacitated, just feel that this way they "come to money" is more relaxed, I used to encounter this situation will give a little, and then will be selective charity, and some young people are very angry, obviously very young and bring children to win the sympathy of others, at this time I will generally never give, at this time if someone gives me I will generally stop the person who gives, Because the phenomenon of giving to others will soon disappear, and I also want to tell you that you are not really helping them, but harming them, as the saying goes, "help the emergency not the poor".

Maybe that person doesn't approve of the good you did, he thinks you're not helping him, so he might see him as an enemy.

These good deeds usually touch their interests at the time, and these people do not have a long-term vision, but will only take revenge for the sake of immediate interests.

I think a good saying goes, good intentions as donkey liver and lungs, many times you do good deeds, but in the other party's view, maybe he doesn't think what you do is a good thing, and even thinks that you are adding to the chaos, at this time or try to explain clearly, and explain your kindness, so as not to turn against each other.

This is normal, sometimes good intentions do bad things, but others hate them more.

Many people don't really want to help people, this is to win the attention of the public, brush a popularity Some time ago, weren't there some outdoor anchors who brushed popularity in the name of charity? So this category of people will definitely be ostracized by society! ‍‍

If you do a good deed, you will be regarded as an enemy, which is called flattery, but will be bitten by dogs.

I believe that doing good deeds should consider the personality factors of the other party, whether the way of thinking is maverick, whether there is jealousy, these often have an important impact on the understanding of things. These factors are varied, and each of them has the potential to play a prominent role in them, which can only be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. ‍‍

Because it hurts the interests of some people, in the face of interests, justice and morality are often excluded! ‍‍

For this kind of thing, you can only see whether you have achieved effective communication with the other party, whether the good things you have done are fully known by the other party, and sometimes the details or parts of the show to the other party will make the other party misunderstand. ‍‍

I think sometimes the interests of the recipients, the interests of the stakeholders, and the public interests of society are in conflict. Not to mention that the practice of sacrificing immediate interests for the sake of long-term interests is not accepted by most people. What to do?

For those who are indifferent to repeated reasoning and persuasion, perhaps it is a real good deed to let society and the law teach them to be talented. ‍‍