If Liu Bang didn t go to Hongmen to apologize to Xiang Yu, how could the ending be? 40

Liu Bang is known for his treacherous and cunning, this man is scheming, the city is very deep, and he does not lose the nature of the hooligan in the market, in many negotiations with Xiang Yu, Xiang Yu has a chance of winning almost every time, but he is a tendon, and Liu Bang is too slippery, so he reverses Xiang Yu for various reasons. And Hongmen apologized, and Liu Bang played Xiang Yu again, on the surface it was extremely contrived, he did this to let Xiang Yu ** rank and attack the King of Qin with him, and Xiang Yu was indecisive, and he would definitely take advantage of it. If Liu Bang doesn't apologize, then Xiang Yu won't be able to get down this step, and if Liu Bang doesn't take over, then Fan Zeng will kick Liu Bang away and catch Xiang Yu, maybe he will kill Liu Bang directly, and there will be no later history.

If you don't go to the Hongmen banquet, Liu Bang can keep his name for the time being, but it will deepen Xiang Yu's suspicion of himself, and it is not yet known who will kill the deer, but the ending may still end in Liu Bang's victory, because Xiang Yu is too childlike, his love for Yu Ji, his righteousness to his brothers, and his stubbornness and self-use are all his ties and weaknesses, and Liu Bang, although his talent is not as good as Xiang Yu, but he is good at employing people, therefore, the dispute between Chu and Han, the ending is not suspenseful, Xiang Yu will lose, besides, history has no if!

Before Liu Bang apologized to Xiang Yu, Xiang Yu was very angry, he said: "Feast on the soldiers, in order to defeat the Pei Gong army." "It means that tomorrow I will reward the soldiers and give me to defeat Liu Bang's army.

Xiang Yu's 400,000 soldiers attacked Liu Bang's army of 100,000, Xiang Yu had extraordinary military talent, Xiang Yu was victorious, and the ending was that Liu Bang was killed and Xiang Yu became the emperor.

If Liu Bang didn't go to Hongmen to apologize to Xiang Yu, he would only be destroyed by Xiang Yu, and Xiang Yu would definitely not let go of those who disobeyed him.

Xiang Yu would definitely kill Liu Bang at that time, so there would be no future.

Whether the Hongmen Banquet exists is controversial, and Xiang Yu doesn't want to kill Liu Bang, so the rabbit dies and the fox is sad, and other forces will be opposed.

It's the same, Liu Bang won't die, the world is still his, but there is one less common saying.

Xiang Yu attacked in anger, and Liu Bang couldn't resist it.

Without this wonderful link, there will be a lot of after-dinner chatter, and there will be a lot of costume TV series.

Historical assumptions don't make sense.

Maybe it won't change, the gods and horses are all floating clouds.

The fight started, and then Xiang Yu beat Liu Bang to his stomach,。。

It must not be, it is because Xiang Yu is soft-hearted, Liu Bang not only planted the seeds of revenge, but also obeyed Zhuge Liang's words and finally unified the world.

In fact, it can't, mainly because Xiang Yu's character is too cowardly, and he has to take into account a lot of consequences when doing things, which is very indecisive.

He can't be called the emperor, because after killing him, everything naturally becomes empty talk, Xiang Yu is really too soft-hearted to Liu Bang.

The story between Xiang Yu and Liu Bang is widely circulated, one is the overlord of Western Chu but eventually kills himself in Wujiang, and the other is the chief of the Surabaya Pavilion but finally becomes the founding emperor of the Han Dynasty. So what if history is rewritten to Xiang Yu killing Liu Bang?

Xiang Yu didn't like to read since he was a child, but he had God-given divine power and was obsessed with "ten thousand enemies". It means that he likes to arrange troops, command thousands of troops to attack the city, and kill the enemy in battle. Xiang Yuli can pull out the mountain and lift the crown, cover the world, and have the courage of ten thousand people.

The uncle and nephew of the Xiang family were stubborn and stubborn, and in only 3 years, they led the army of 5 princes to destroy the tyrannical Qin. Everyone is afraid of it like a tiger, and they all call it "overlord". Xiang Yu's courage can be seen from this.

If Xiang Yu can recruit the world's talents, can listen to the advice of the resourceful Fan Zengzhi, be more ruthless at the critical moment, and never allow himself to be indecisive, then the world must have a surname instead of a surname Liu.

If Liu Bang is killed at this time, Xiao He will guard the rear, and as soon as he learns the news, he will definitely immediately help the new king Liu Ying to the throne (Liu Fei does not have the backing of the main palace of Empress Lu, of course, there is no way to compete), and then crusade against Xiang Yu on the charge of untrustworthy, and several brothers of the Liu group, Zhou Boluxuan, will definitely try their best to requisit, the power of anger is terrible, and the Liu group will only become more united. After all, although Liu Bang is the core, this team has been forged impeccable over the years.

2.The threat of the Liu Group is Xiang Yu, Xiang Yu at this time is the strongest today, hard-hitting, and the probability of winning is very low, and it is without getting Han Xin. 3.At this time, Xiang Yu's group was greatly inspired, and Fan Zeng and Xiang Yu were in one place, which was immeasurable.

4.As soon as Xiang Yu does this, the notorious reputation of treachery has been confirmed, and warlords from all walks of life will regard it as a thorn in their side, and they will definitely respond to Xiao He to eliminate Xiang Yu, but with the urine of several warlords, I am afraid that it will be sitting on the mountain and watching the tiger fight again.

So in this way, Xiang Yu's army's chances of winning are greatly increased, and they will win the fight against the Liu clan, but it will not be easy, and in the end, I am afraid that it will be harvested by other warlords.

If he did not hesitate at the Hongmen banquet, but killed the killer and killed Liu Bang, history would have presented itself to the world in a different way. Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, which is better or worse, is really difficult to assert. Whether the dynasty established by Xiang Yu was more prosperous than Liu Han is a difficult question that cannot be assumed and answered.

Chu and Han fought for hegemony, heroes and heroes were defeated and hooligans and scoundrels claimed to be emperors, such an ending seems to be accidental, but it is actually inevitable. The fall of Qin, the destruction of Chu, and the rise of the Han Dynasty, the cycle of history goes back and forth, and the rise and fall of chaos, what can future generations say?

The history of the Han Dynasty in China was rewritten.

Xiang Yu and Liu Bang, as the two most successful figures in history who rebelled against the Qin Dynasty, created the beginning of the grassroots rebellion against the upper class, and Xiang Yu and Liu Bang went from being good brothers to turning against each other, which is also a topic that everyone talks about, and when Xiang Yu set up a Hongmen banquet and invited Liu Bang to the table, he just wanted to kill Liu Bang, but he was not ruthless enough to let Liu Bang escape, which was the beginning of the Han Dynasty.

If Xiang Yu killed Liu Bang at the beginning, it would be possible to rewrite Chinese history in the future, of course, there is also the possibility of not rewriting, but the probability of rewriting is very large, after all, at the beginning, Xiang Yu's strength was greater than Liu Bang, and only Liu Bang was the emperor in front of Xiang Yu, so killing Liu Bang basically had nothing to do with the Liu family, and the next thing was the world of the overlord of Western Chu.

But history is history, as a modern viewer, I still have a certain sense of history, China's change of dynasty, is the prosperity and decline, the national strength reaches a certain point, there will be a corrupt emperor, scourge the entire country, so even if the Western Chu overlord God throne, only the Han Dynasty will change, the future historical development must be like the present, there will always be the collapse of feudal society.

China's feudal society and dynastic change is because its fundamental reason lies in the hereditary system, not the capable person takes office, but from the emperor's son, who the emperor likes, who will be given a position, but this is a two-choice fate for the country, because if it is a Ming monarch, the people of the world will be blessed, if it is a tyrant, it will be a devastating blow, so this is a constant replacement, because the emperor is not good, which also represents the decline of the dynasty, once the people are pressed to the point that there is no way out, they will always resist.

Therefore, even if the overlord of Western Chu ascends to the throne, only the Han Dynasty will change, and for Chinese history, it may only be a change in the name of a dynasty.

I think Xiang Yu is a righteous gentleman who values love and righteousness, so he didn't kill him, if he killed Liu Bang, Xiang Yu should be the emperor, and he will rewrite a lot of history.

I think history will be rewritten, and Liu Bang will not be called emperor. But history is history, and there are no ifs.

If that is the case, history will have to be rewritten, and without the Han Dynasty, there will be no later Three Kingdoms, Jin, Sui, Tang, Song, Yuan, Ming, and Qing Dynasties, and even today's society. Marx's historical materialism says that the people create history, and heroes can rewrite history.

Liu Bang died at the Hongmen banquet, it is possible that Xiang Yu pacified the world and became a generation of tyrants, and in the end the world was in chaos, or it is possible that the Seven Heroes of War and other heroes were restored, repeating the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.

History chose Liu Bang instead of Xiang Yu, which shows that carrying the seeds of hatred will not go far. Violence is the quickest way to solve a problem, never the best. Xiang Yu lacks benevolence and righteousness, lacks the foundation of public opinion, and has an arrogant personality, so he is stubborn and self-serving, and does not like to give advice, and at the same time he is a very outstanding military general.

There will be another Liu Bang, the gears of history are not changed by personal will, at that time, Liu Bang was chosen, if Liu Bang died, he would find another Liu Bang, and would not choose Xiang Yu, because Xiang Yu was not the one who was the emperor.

If Xiang Yu killed Liu Bang on the "Hongbai Gate Banquet", you must be another record. If dao Xiang Yu kills Liu Bang, then.

There will definitely be no Liu family. Maybe Xiang Ayu will be the emperor, maybe it will be someone else, and there will be no Liu family. History is history, because of his, momentary hesitation. Achieved Liu Bang and had Liu's country. In the eyes of future generations, it is both accidental and inevitable.

In this way, Xiang Yu will be the emperor, and there will be no Liu family in the back, so there will be no one in the back who is Xiang Yu's opponent and dominates the world.

There is no villain like Liu Bang!

There will definitely be no Liu family, Xiang Yu is also a brave and resourceful person, if he kills Liu Bang, the future history will be rewritten, and there will be no future history.

If Xiang Yu killed Liu Bang ruthlessly at that time, he would definitely be the one who became the emperor. Because at that time, there was no strength in the Central Plains that could compete with him.

I think even if Liu Bang is killed, there will be other people, Xiang Yu is a stubborn person who is not suitable to be the monarch of a country, it can be said that he has a good hand of cards but plays it badly, which is related to his character.

I think Liu Bang should be killed, because Liu Bang is Xiang Yu's only rival, and Xiang Yu's purpose in setting up the Hongmen Banquet is to kill Liu Bang, as long as Liu Bang is dead, Xiang Yu will have one less great threat.

Of course it should, Xiang Yu should listen to Fan Zeng's words and kill Liu Bang, so that no one will compete with him in the future, and being merciful to the enemy is cruel to himself.

I don't think Liu Bang should be killed, the reason why he set up this Hongmen banquet is also to test Liu Bang, if there is no Liu Bang, there will be no future for Xiang Yu.

Yes, if Liu Bang is killed, no one in the whole world is Xiang Yu's opponent, then it is Xiang Yu who is the emperor, not Liu Bang.

Because Xiang Yu felt that Liu Bang was not at fault, if he killed him, he would be said by others that he was jealous of his ability and couldn't tolerate others, so he changed his mind and let Liu Bang go. He was indeed wrong, underestimated Liu Bang, and caused the world to be taken away by Liu Bang.

Because Xiang Yu and Liu Bang had an agreement in front of King Chu Huai, the one who entered Hanzhong first was the king, and Liu Bang entered Hanzhong first, so Xiang Yu did not kill Liu Bang and let him go, combined with history, he did something wrong.

For the sake of fame, it is not a mistake, because he did have a great advantage at that time, and he did not need to kill Liu Bang to ruin his reputation.

Xiang Yu will definitely wipe out Liu Bang's army, and in the end he will dominate the world.

In history, Xiang Yu once set up a banquet to entertain Liu Bang, but did not follow Fan Zeng's advice to get rid of Liu Bang, and finally Xiang Yu Wujiang killed himself, Liu Bang unified the world, if Xiang Yu killed Liu Bang in the Hongmen banquet, maybe Xiang Yu will win the world.

I think Xiang Yu will dominate the world. Because once Liu Bang died, Xiang Yu would have no opponent at all.