Jumping from a state owned enterprise to a private enterprise, I am entangled in my heart, please he

When I just graduated, I was in a similar situation to you, because I couldn't make a lot of connections and could only be on the front line of the workshop, and I collapsed to the limit. The first year was quite hard-working, and in the second year, I was almost secretly looking for a job, but I always missed out on my dream job. Slowly summed up the experience, lesbians, if you get married and have children, you are very interested in you by employers, especially private companies.

Five insurances and one housing fund are still more practical for lesbians. You should know what I mean.

Now I am learning something while I am young, and I will have the capital to change jobs in the future.

This is my personal experience, and I hope it can help you.

It's a common problem, and the point is that you're the kind of person who tosses and turns, and if you don't think you can do it, develop more interest on your own. Actually, your current salary is a little lower, but it's still a stable income.

Whoever says that if you are not extroverted enough, you can't do sales and procurement, just don't engage in pyramid schemes; Since you are entangled and complaining, you will jump out, and it is not a good type of work and a good unit.

Mix a year's experience and then jump, the best! Work is not only professional, but also collaborative.

Study while working.,See what you want to do in the future.。。。

I think it's better to do this first, because if you jump into a private company, you may not be able to find it, and it will be a waste of time. This is just my suggestion, you can only look at it, and the most important thing is your own ideas.

I have heard such a sentence in the workplace before, state-owned enterprises are talent training bases, and if they train people well, they will leave. Some people even say that those who leave state-owned enterprises are industry elites, and those who remain are waiting to retire. For example, wages are not high in state-owned refineries, but much higher in private refineries for similar work.

Which one will you choose? According to different employment concepts, everyone's choice is different. If students prefer stability, they will still choose to work in a state-owned enterprise.

Even so, graduates need to be thoughtful when making their choices. Don't wait until you leave a state-owned enterprise and enter the private sector, just like this famous graduate student, only to find out that life is not as simple as you think, and regret is useless. I saw a graduate student from a prestigious university online and shared his job search experience.

When he first graduated, like most college graduates, he followed his parents' advice and found a relatively stable job to keep himself safe. Through his efforts, he was finally accepted into a state-owned enterprise.

However, this state-owned enterprise is not what he imagined. The job is indeed very stable, and there is basically no overtime, but the salary is not high, and there is no opportunity for development. So, his friend poached him from a good private company with a good salary.

He resolutely chose to transfer from a state-owned enterprise to a private enterprise. Despite his parents' obstruction, he did not give up. At the beginning of his career in the private sector, he was energetic and motivated every day.

However, half a year later, he regretted it. The wages are indeed high, but the work pressure has also increased.

Relationships in private companies are also complex. Not only do you need to do your job well, but you also need to build good relationships with the people around you. If you accidentally get assigned to a group with your boss's relatives, you will have to be more careful if you pretend to be a good person.

In state-owned enterprises, there is no such problem. State-owned enterprises have the principle of recusal when recruiting, and their relatives cannot apply for the same position.

Because of the state-owned enterprises, although his interpersonal relationship is complicated, his job is very stable, and he will never be unemployed, but in the case of a private company, he may go bankrupt overnight when he is blind, and he will also be in arrears of wages.

First of all, the change of property is because compared with the two, the treatment of state-owned enterprises will be relatively better, and then the working atmosphere in state-owned enterprises is also better. And the development prospects are a little broader.

It may be that there are too many housework quarrels, which affects the so, there will be such a thing, which is more unpleasant.

There is no regret or regret, everyone has their own choices, what they want to do, even if they lose, it is a challenge to themselves, how can they know if they don't do what they want to do earlier, and it is artificial.

People who switch jobs from state-owned enterprises to private enterprises will regret it, the work of state-owned enterprises is relatively stable, and there is not so much pressure, but the pressure of working in private enterprises will be particularly high, and the work is unstable; After switching to the private sector, there will be a lot of pressure, and the heart will be unbalanced, and if your work ability is not strong, it will be difficult to stand firm, and the pressure will be even greater.

Most people who have switched from state-owned enterprises to private enterprises regret that they will face greater competitive pressure after switching to private enterprises, and may face unemployment, working in state-owned enterprises, although the salary is not very high, but the job is relatively stable, while working in private enterprises will be affected by pressure from all sides.

1.Working in a state-owned enterprise is more stable. After I graduated from college, I went to many companies to look for a job, but I only found a job in a sales company, for our sales company to bury and say, every month there is a performance to be completed, if which month is not completed, then the next month may be persuaded to retire, so the job is very unstable, and there are many old-timers, even if they are in their 40s, they may still be fired by the company, so many people will choose to work in state-owned enterprises, after all, such enterprises are more stable, and their jobs will be more stable.

2.Wages in state-owned enterprises are better. For example, in our city, if it is an ordinary undergraduate graduate, the general salary is four or five thousand, but if you go to work in a state-owned enterprise, it will be tens of thousands at least a month, which is why many young people want to go to work in a state-owned enterprise, because although it is impossible to get rich by going to work in a state-owned enterprise, for example, it can earn millions a year, but it can also be higher than most people's income, and the treatment in all aspects is also good, and there is generally no overtime, so many young people like to go to work in state-owned enterprises.

3.State-owned enterprises will be more respected when they go to work. For young people, in addition to getting a high salary, it is also to gain respect, for example, in our family, if you know that you are working in a state-owned enterprise, everyone will respect you very much, and people will think that you have found a good job, but if you only work in a small company, people will think that you have no future, even if your current salary is good, people will think that you have no future, so being able to be respected is also an important reason why many young people choose to work in state-owned enterprises.

This sentence is somewhat absolute, but it is not without reason.

The reason why I think private enterprises are more attractive is mainly because private enterprises have more flexibility in salary increases, and capable people can get more because of their great contributions in private enterprises, while state-owned enterprises, even if you are capable, because of the system, you cannot flexibly raise salaries, and can only achieve it by issuing some awards, but the process of applying for awards is very cumbersome. And it doesn't always get approval from superiors.

However, state-owned enterprises still have many advantages in terms of security, culture, and stability.

There is no state-owned enterprise that is completely unable to compete with private enterprises, and this view seems to be very correct, but it is not necessarily the truth.

We can't compare the best private companies with the worst state-owned enterprises, that's not fair. If you compare the ordinary clumsy state-owned enterprises with the general private enterprises that have gained a firm foothold for several years, you will find that in fact, the two sides only have different division of labor, different positioning and roles, and rarely face each other head-on.

State-owned enterprises that really need to face end customers often perform poorly because their specialty is to integrate resources, rather than to do a specific thing in depth, and they lack sufficient manpower.

When the time comes for private companies to really need their integration, they find that they are extremely lacking in coordination and scheduling experience, especially in the face of different types of other participants.

Therefore, state-owned enterprises and private enterprises are the roles needed in the market, if there are also enterprises that endorse the best in Europe and the United States and enterprises that are generally flexible and responsible for implementation.

State-owned enterprises have a certain administrative nature. For historical reasons, the classification of state-owned enterprises is quite complex. For state-owned enterprises in China, state-owned enterprises are those that invest in or hold more than 50% of the shares in state-owned assets.

In fact, it cannot be said that state-owned enterprises can't fight private enterprises, and most of them also have many private enterprises that need the endorsement of state-owned enterprises to receive some or do some projects, but that private enterprises are more flexible and have a deeper background of state-owned enterprises.

The total welfare is the same as the decisive state-owned enterprises.

First, the total benefits are the same, you put in more labor, and you can see what is cost-effective.

Second, private enterprises are unstable. Who knows what tomorrow will be after today. If the total benefits have doubled, you can consider it, then you have earned two years of money in a year, and you will not lose money if you change jobs one day when the company fails, and you have already earned a little bit of what you should earn.

Third, private enterprises work too hard, and when they get older, it is not cost-effective to get sick. Young capital looks at money, and old capital looks at the body.

Fourth, it is difficult for state-owned enterprises to be promoted, so is it easy for private enterprises? If there is a relationship between state-owned enterprises, there is no relationship in private enterprises?

Fifth, people always go to higher places, and second-tier cities are always better than third-tier cities. If you really want to work hard, you should go to a first-tier city instead of going back to a third-tier city. If you are tired of going back, you should find an easy one, but you are looking for a tiring job.

I suggest that you can find a high-income position in the same city, state-owned enterprises are the best, if not, foreign companies and private enterprises can be. European and American companies are better than Japanese companies, Taiwanese companies and private companies, they do things more standardly, they are not so busy at work, and they will also take into account the normal rest of employees.

Sixth, in fact, it is as important to have a good job as a good salary. Now educating children not only costs money, but also takes time, and you have free time to take care of the children and spend more time with your wife, how good.

Seventh, what will happen to your wife if you go back to your hometown? Go back or separate? I think both options are problematic, unless your wife can go back to your hometown and find a job with the same income and ease.

Personal experience: I worked in a public institution in Shanghai ten years ago, and my income was 3,000 a month. Job-hopping, there is a private enterprise wants me, a foreign company wants me, the private enterprise gives 7000, but the company is very small, the foreign company is the top 500, give 8000, but the private enterprise gives tax avoidance, the foreign company does not, and the salary of the foreign company is low.

At that time, foreign companies were decisively selected. Ten years later, the income of public institutions can basically reach 8,000 to 10,000, and private enterprises will basically not move. I currently have a pre-tax income of more than 3w in a foreign company.

The actual situation is that the salary given by that private enterprise is generally not high, and in order to pull me, it is willing to pay a much higher salary than other employees, but I estimate that I will never be able to increase my salary after I go.

Almost, decisive state-owned enterprises, unless you are optimistic about that industry and are willing to work hard for it.