If the relationship is unsuccessful, do you need to let the woman accompany the loss fee?

Consumption expenses between a man and a woman during a relationship are generally regarded as normal courtesy exchanges, and no matter who proposes to break up, they do not need to be refunded or returned. However, the following circumstances are supported by law for the restitution: 1. The property demanded by one party from the other party under the pretext of marriage, and the amount is relatively large.

Second, although it is not the first case, if the value of the goods donated by one party is relatively large, and therefore it has a greater impact on the life of the donor, the recipient has the obligation to return it.

This kind of man is really rare, talking about friends together is nothing more than eating, drinking, and having fun, how much can it cost him. It's too much. If he goes to your house to propose money when it comes to marriage, the money will be returned to the family, and there will be no other compensation for losses (there is a legal basis).

It's hard to define, but what do you mean by loss? Under normal circumstances, it is not necessary to ask the woman to "pay for damages". In this period of time, everyone has losses, is she just paying at all?

Think about her advantages, no one is perfect, and mutual understanding is the best foundation for starting a family.

According to the custom, before marriage, the dowry and gift money given by the man to the woman can be recovered and asked to be returned, but it is difficult to think about the situation you said, even if you really want to come back, what can you do? The reputation is out, I'll talk about it later, who is going to talk to you!

Normally.

Unreasonable: This is not a reasonable request.

During a relationship. When it comes to normal interactions.

It's a consensual act.

There is one exception.

It's man to woman.

Did it cause substantial harm.

Otherwise. It's a bit of a.

If it doesn't work, it will be compensated.

It doesn't make sense.

Not legal, because it was mutually consensual at the time!

Why money? Romantic relationships are not protected by law.

It's okay that he doesn't love you anymore, there are many such men, but isn't it a bit too much to ask him for compensation?

Did he hurt you? If there is a must, it is too much if there is not.

If you insist on compensation, at most you will be comforted.

Of course not. Falling in love is something that both parties are willing to do, and it's not something that someone forces you to do. You are not married, so you are not protected by law.

There is no such thing in the breakup fee law.

It's just a relationship. There is an option to leave. and getting married.

No, it was originally under the premise of freedom in love, breaking up means that two people are no longer suitable for being together, separation is inevitable, and it is also the tempering of two people's feelings, and there is no need for either party to ask for study fees. Falling in love is a ladder of growth and learning, and it is also an inevitable experience, and you can accept the current result calmly.

The loss of youth fee is simply nonsense, women have youth, men have no youth, and if you don't get married, you can keep your youth, it's ridiculous.

Look at whether there is common property, and look at the man's old feelings.

Why? The man also has youth, does the woman want to give it to the man?

Youth loss fee generally refers to the fact that after the man and woman break up due to love or the dissolution of the marriage relationship, the man or woman (usually the majority of women) consciously pays more for the other party, hoping that the other party will make some financial compensation for their youth loss. "Youth compensation" and "break-up fee" are not supported by law.

In some marital disputes, there is a situation where after the engagement, the parties dissolve the marriage after a long period of time, and one party is at fault while the other party is past the marriageable age. Therefore, the innocent party made a claim for youth compensation.

This so-called youth compensation has no legal basis and cannot be supported by the law. Of course, if direct economic losses are caused to the innocent party due to the reasons of the party at fault, according to the relevant provisions of the General Principles of China's Civil Law, the party at fault can be required to compensate for the direct economic losses caused, but it is by no means compensation for moral damages. Therefore, whether to pay the youth loss fee or not depends on the man's own wishes.

Hello, youth loss fee generally refers to the fact that after the man and woman break up or the marriage relationship is dissolved, one of them feels that he has paid more for the other party, and hopes that the other party will make some financial compensation for his youth loss. Strictly speaking, there is no provision in the law related to "youth loss fees", which is a popular term full of jokes. Because of this, it is difficult to get legal support for the "youth loss fee" that you claim because the woman married and deceived her feelings.

The law protects legal marriages, but does not interfere with romantic feelings between natural persons. If the other party is a "spouse cohabiting with another person", even if the "loss of youth payment" has already been paid, if it is paid out of the joint property of the husband and wife, the spouse of the paying party has the right to sue the "third party" for refund. If your behavior is excessive, for the purpose of illegal possession, you use threats or coercion methods against the victim to forcibly demand public or private property, you may also be suspected of the crime of extortion, and you must bear corresponding criminal responsibility in accordance with the law.

Youth is a fleeting treasure for everyone, and how to spend one's youth correctly is everyone's own choice. Moreover, the basis of love is the freedom of love, if the law protects the so-called "youth loss fee", it means that the two parties in love cannot break up at will, which forms a personal restriction, so the "youth loss fee" is not a legal right. The judge's judgment should be based on the law and the facts, and there is no basis for the loss of youth that you claim that the woman deceived her feelings by marrying someone else, and if the woman commits fraud under the guise of feelings, she can report the case to the public security organs.

Legal basis] Article 274 of the Criminal Law: Where public or private property is extorted, the amount is relatively large or there are multiple extortions, a sentence of up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release is to be given, and/or a fine; where the amount is huge or there are other serious circumstances, a sentence of between 3 and 10 years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given; where the amount is especially huge or there are other especially serious circumstances, a sentence of 10 or more years imprisonment and a concurrent fine is to be given.

Yes. She is married, and if she still pretends to be an unmarried young man to deceive you and defraud you of your property, it constitutes the crime of fraud.

Yes, ask questions.

We've been together for three years, and today I found out that he didn't get divorced, and today her husband beat me, I want to know how much compensation I can pay if I sue for three years in accordance with the law.

Wait for me to look it up.

If it can constitute the crime of bigamy, the specific amount of compensation depends on the specific circumstances.

Ask whether a man living with a woman without knowing it for three years is legally responsible.

If you only live with another person in marriage, and do not live directly or indirectly in the name of husband and wife, it is only a matter of morality.

If another person cohabits during the marriage and lives in the name of husband and wife or is generally considered to be cohabiting by a third party, he shall be sentenced to two years' imprisonment or criminal detention for the crime of bigamy.

The question means that according to the law, she is married and has children, and the crime of cohabitation with a man is established, right?

In principle, it is.

Question: In what name is cohabitation considered a crime of bigamy, and how many years is the punishment for the crime of bigamy?

Have you registered your marriage?

Then she can constitute bigamy in principle, and she should usually live together in the name of husband and wife.

Ask what is the chance of winning a lawsuit for damages.

Do you usually live as husband and wife?

The so-called bigamy refers to marrying another person while having a husband or wife, or marrying another person knowing that the other person has a husband or wife. Moreover, marriage here includes not only going to the marriage registration office to register the marriage, but also including two people living together in the name of husband and wife, and the people around them think that they are husband and wife. Bigamy undermines the monogamous system in China, affects China's traditional public order and good customs, and causes certain harm to society, so it needs to be punished by criminal law.

If there is no cohabitation in the name of husband and wife.

The success rate of appeals will drop a bit.

However, it feels like your success rate is quite large.

He concealed you, had a husband and wife relationship with others, and had children, and lived with you, which can basically be judged to constitute the same marriage.

In general, the sentence is 300-5,000 yuan, and the more serious point can be 5,000-10,000 yuan, and generally will not exceed 50,000 yuan.

Your odds of winning are quite good, I hope it helps you.

The man is not stupid. It's strange that the feelings can be together in this way. The bride price will not be refunded after marriage. And in the event of a divorce, the woman will have to divide the man's property. As a one-man man, even a woman can't coax.

Yes, but it is not necessary, and if she cheats you out of money and does not pay it back, you can consider suering.

Personally, I think that because the woman is married, the feelings of deception, I personally feel that suing the woman is not particularly realistic, this is wishful thinking, and there is no legal basis.

Analyze if the other party is hiding their marriage.

Then come and fall in love with you.

Then you can sue the other party.

This is possible.

It is advisable that you provide conclusive evidence.

Prove that you really didn't know that the other person was married at the time.

Depending on what you have described, there are two situations in which you can sue:

1. The woman marries you again without a divorce. You can sue her for bigamy.

2. The woman concealed the fact that she was married, and used love and marriage as a bait to defraud you of a large amount of money. You can sue her for fraud.

It is a serious crime for a married woman to deceive with feelings, she may have deceived a lot of men, maybe a **, I think you must call the police to arrest her first, and appeal after the public security organ collects the certificate, and let him accompany you to pay for economic losses and youth losses, and the court will definitely support you, you will definitely win the lawsuit, but you must get the relevant evidence.

If she's just cheating on your feelings, there's no way to say it!

But if she cheats you out of money, then you can ask her for compensation, and you can call the police, let the police investigate, and finally estimate that she will be sentenced.

If she cheats you out of money, you can sue; As for cheating feelings, it seems that you can't sue for it, and the judge can't judge the main thing. The law is only the boundary of behavior, and it cannot constrain morality. You don't have to be too sad, if you don't owe each other, how can you meet.

Everyone experiences love catastrophes, and everyone's story is different. In the future, it's good to find multiple eyes on the object. God will always save the best for the last, to you.

So you have to believe that what passes by is a floating cloud, and what is really worth cherishing is waiting for you in front of you, and don't fall into the present.

It also depends on the specific process, whether there is deception or not.

If it's a scam of your money, you can sue him.

It's useless, you love me....

No. There is no legal basis.

Yes, provided you have proof!

No, it is inappropriate to ask for moral damages when there is no obvious fault on both sides, and it is contrary to morality and public order and good customs.

From a legal point of view, the payment of the woman's mental damage after the breakup is not directly recognized and supported. Paying the woman's mental damage after a breakup is a folk development, because the person after the breakup is traumatized, thinking that he is in a disadvantaged position in love and paying more than the other party, hoping to get financial compensation when he breaks up.

Some female parties believe that they fall in love in a relatively short period of time and break up in a relatively short period of time, and feel that they are "losing" as women, so they demand that the man should give a certain amount of compensation for mental losses when they break up, which has no legal basis.

There is no provision in Chinese law to pay the woman's moral damage after the breakup, so there is no legal basis for claiming compensation for moral damages. Moreover, the love between the two parties is a voluntary act, if there is really a loss, both parties have a loss, not only the woman has a loss, and youth is not a right in essence, it will disappear with the passage of time, even if you don't get married, youth will disappear, and it will not stay at a certain moment.

Emotional matters are difficult to be restrained by morality, just like splitting immorality, but in the end, this immorality has not caused much adverse impact on the parties. It is not appropriate to pay for the woman's moral damages.

The reason why the man needs to pay the woman's moral damages is known to the general public is that in the course of judicial practice in recent years, it has often been reported by newspapers and magazines. It generally refers to the fact that after the man and the woman break up or the marriage relationship is dissolved, the man or woman (generally the majority of the women) consciously pays more for the other party, hoping that the other party will make certain economic compensation for their losses.

Strictly speaking, it is a "folk language" that has never been seen in any law. Because of this, it is difficult for the parties' claims to be supported by law because there is no clear legal basis.

No, because love itself is free, you need to be able to afford it yourself, and if you really can't afford it, it's best not to fall in love.

No, love is managed by two people together, and poor relationship management is not only a man's problem, so there is no need to pay.

No, love can't be solved with money, falling in love is something you want to do, it's good to get together and disperse, there's no need to worry about it.