Please translate with an English expert urgently needed 20

I put forward the reason, perhaps, a new version of Sherlock Holmes'The common law, taught by Howe, characterizes his work as a "land — marked in the history of ideas." One of the reasons why he may not have been mentioned to study the history of ideas when he was at home was that "it will be characters that expand our minds without changing them a little."

In any event, it is the burden — not to see the place found in the common law of the current of the late 19th century ideas. Professor Hao has achieved this goal with the skills and the distribution of power. 3 My duty is to briefly determine what contribution, if any, is to the present doctrine of criminal law in two volumes.

I'm on a mission to participate in some embarrassment. First, the modern student crime-spine law, in general, rejects the broad support of Sherlock Holmes — the so-called teleological guilt (although it must be admitted, intentionally or unintentionally, that the position of modern trials in the United States and Britain provides considerable support). 4— The sins of the past, the issue has been widely and hotly discussed by modern critics.

There is no serious student who delinquents the law, and there is no one who says it. 5 It requires a certain degree of recklessness to unleash another much-occupied foot in this field. But even more surprising was the discovery that the Sherlock Holmes article was not an excellent useful tool for identifying and reviewing many of the issues that have been seen as crucial.

It's true, and I believe that because of his extraordinary breadth of promotion and (probably the same thing) disposing of neglect or slight considerations, a fair confrontation is needed. This is not to say, however, that the book has completely exhausted the passage of years of its power. No one encounters this common law for the first time, as a young man can not remember the excitement of it and then make it; And reading it, he may find that he is not completely immune.

The phosphorescent phrase of Sherlock Holmes is still smoldering. In his best sentences there is an inevitability to express coercive concern and approval. But one of the discoveries made in reading these chapters is the famous maxim of Sherlock Holmes that has long begun to live his life:

That is, the epigram of Sherlock Holmes has applied the context and meaning not intended or intended by the author. The devil can also quote the Bible for his own purposes; With Sherlock Holmes often quoting the Bible for ignorance of their satanic role.

Hope it helps the landlord.

Presented, perhaps, just, a new version of Sherlock Holmes.

Common law, Professor Howe is characterized as a "land-."

Mark in the History of Ideas. "'t h e** home, Nigel Dennis, yes.

Not referring to the intellectual history of this study when he.

Make one of his characters say: "It will expand our hearts and minds not."

They change a little bit. = In any case, a heavy burden, which is re-burdened.

The view is not located in the circulation of local customary law.

Ideas of the late nineteenth century. Professor Howe has made it happen.

This goal is related to skill and authority. 3 The obligation to which I was assigned was short-lived.

Determine what contribution, if any, volume of the second chapter.

A discussion of current theories of criminal law. It's a task.

Participate in some embarrassment. First of all, the modern student crim-spine method, in general, rejects the so-called widely embraced by Sherlock Holmes.

The existence of a theory called the goal (although it must be admitted, consciously or unconsciously, is the modern trial in the United States and.

The UK provides a fairly good amount of support for the location). 4 -

In the past, the question of the motive of the crime has been widely and eagerly discussed.

The lawyer did not say it. 5 This requires a certain amount of reckless launching.

Another foray into this much-occupied field. But what's even more surprising is that the discovery of Sherlock Holmes's ** is not a very useful tool.

Many of the issues identified and reviewed are considered:

Crucial. This is true, I believe, due to his extraordinary breadth.

generalization and (possibly the same amount) a tendency.

Ignoring or minor series of considerations requires a fair confrontation.

That's not to say, but the book has been completely depleted.

Its power has passed over the years. No one encountered it for the first time.

T h e customary law as a young person can fail to recall the excitement.

And then made.

It's too difficult, but not recommended to adopt the first floor! You have to see Bu Bi to, this machine translation, this article is a type of hypocrisy, how it feels like it was written by a foreigner, really, Yu Zai, take a look!