How to understand that philosophy originates from human beings pursuit of society and thinking abou

I don't have any points, and the philosophical questions are simply afraid that you don't understand, and if you say it in detail, you're afraid of wasting time, and you don't give a point... I can only say 2 words simply.

Philosophy can surpass science because it begins to study and explore things that are not actually discovered, and can think unrealistically to obtain new discoveries, such as gods and ghosts, in science, it means that superstition stops excavation, and from a philosophical point of view, new discoveries will be made, and this special discovery will surpass science for hundreds of years, although in the future this philosophy will become a science, so philosophy is an advanced science beyond the times, and it has also proved that it is science, that is, it is in line with everything in real life.

It's just that philosophy has been discovered in "pre-era" times, and it's become philosophy, philosophy beyond science, but philosophy in this pre-era has not been generalized to society, so it's not science, it's philosophy, not to mention wasting my typing time.

Studying philosophy, you need to discuss, research, think, think about it, and you can understand it by thinking about it.

Explain with your name. If tears become poems, if tears represent sadness, then there is a question of why tears are sad, after solving these two problems, you will have a general summary of how to be sad so that you cry, and finally the emotion will sublimate the emotion of tears to a kind of regularity that can be described in poetry, that is, the philosophical category.

In this passage, everyone is a philosopher. Chinese experts and scholars are harming people. Philosophy is a systematic theory, not just nonsense like Chinese experts and scholars. You may not be able to accept it, see The New Dialectics of Nature.

How to understand, this sentence is an understanding, how do you still want to understand, you can only understand after you have experienced reflection, and you can't ask to understand.

Yes, in life practice, people will consciously or unconsciously think about the people and things around them, and use the concepts they form in thinking to guide their own life and practice. In these reflections, the tremor touches on the philosophical question of Benakai in one way or another. In this sense, we say that philosophy originates from people's questioning of practice and thinking about the world.

Categories: Education Academic Examination >>**Report.

Analysis: Describe the theoretical content and significance of the basic questions of philosophy.

Contents: 1) Which is the primacy of spirit and matter, that is, who comes first and who comes later, who decides whom, and who is the essence and origin of the world.

2) Whether there is an identity between spirit and matter, that is, whether people can understand the world and transform the world. According to the differences in the first aspect of philosophical issues, philosophy in general, especially modern philosophy, is divided into two basic schools: materialism and idealism.

Significance: The fundamental questions of philosophy are of great theoretical significance. The question of how the first aspect of its content, i.e., how matter and consciousness, is the first nature, is the only criterion for distinguishing materialism from idealism.

The criterion for distinguishing between agnosticism and agnosticism is whether or not to recognize the identity of thinking and being, and whether to recognize the knowability of the world's high dust points. Anyone who admits that thinking and being are identical, that the world is knowable, is agnostic; Otherwise, agnosticism.

The fundamental questions of philosophy are of great practical significance. The problem of the relationship between thinking and existence is applied to practical life as the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity. People's activities are mainly to understand the world and transform it.

Understanding the world is subjective, reflecting objectivity, and transforming the world is subjective and reactionary. Only by properly resolving the problem of the relationship between subjectivity and objectivity can we correctly understand the world, effectively transform the world, and achieve success in our work.

Its theoretical significance lies in the fact that the question of what is the primary nature of thinking and existence is the only criterion for dividing enlightenment materialism and idealism; The question of whether thinking and being are the same is the criterion for distinguishing between agnosticism and agnosticism.

Its practical significance lies in the fact that all human practical activities contain two basic aspects, namely, understanding the world (subjective reflection of objectivity) and transforming the world (subjective view of objectivity), and its essence is to deal with the problem of the quiet relationship between thinking and existence.

(1) Practice has a decisive role in cognition: practice is the first thing to know, practice is the driving force for the development of cognition, practice is the purpose of cognition, and practice is the only criterion for testing whether cognition is correct or not.

2) Understanding also affects practice and reacts to practice: Correct understanding of scientific theories has a tremendous guiding role in practice; Wrong understanding and unscientific theories will lead practice astray.

Conclusion: Practice determines cognition, cognition depends on practice, and has a counter-effect on practice. This is the dialectical unity of practice and understanding.

Practice brings true knowledge, and without practice, there is no right to speak.

The basic problem of philosophy is the question of the relationship between thinking and being.

Thinking refers to spirit or consciousness, and being refers to the material world.

It includes two aspects: first, the question of who is the first and who is the second nature of thinking and being, that is, the question of who is the origin and who is derived from thinking and being.

The different answers to this question divide the two camps of philosophy. Those who advocate that thinking, spirit, and consciousness are the first belong to the camp of idealism; Those who advocate existence and the primacy of matter belong to the materialist camp.

Second, there is the question of whether there is identity between thinking and existence, that is, whether our thinking can correctly reflect the existing existence. Whoever answers this question in the affirmative is philosophically agnostic; Anyone who doubts or answers this question in the negative will eventually lead to agnosticism in philosophy.

The theoretical significance of the fundamental questions of philosophy is as follows: First, it can be seen from the content of the first aspect that it provides us with a criterion for theoretically identifying materialism and idealism. According to this criterion, all philosophy belongs to either materialism or idealism, and there is no philosophical school that belongs to either materialism or idealism.

This provides a theory for us to adhere to materialism and criticize idealism. Second, from the content of the second aspect, it can be seen that although thinking and being are two completely different fields with opposing natures, they are also identical. This provides a theoretical basis for us to correctly reflect and understand existence, and at the same time, it also provides a theory for criticizing the agnosticism that asserts that thinking and existence are not identical, and that thinking cannot correctly reflect existence.

The theory of the basic problems of philosophy is of great practical significance, which means that the question of the relationship between thinking and existence is not only the basic question of philosophy, but also the basic question of all practical work. First of all, there is a question of what to start from in all practical work. From the content of the first aspect of the basic problems of philosophy, we know that in order to adhere to the materialist philosophical line in practical work, we must proceed from reality.

Second, we must adhere to agnosticism in our practical work. No matter how complicated the actual situation is, through our efforts, we can always gradually reach a correct understanding of it, and a correct understanding of the objective world is the prerequisite for correctly transforming the objective world. Therefore, only by adhering to agnosticism in practice can we transform the objective world more effectively and successfully.

The above analysis shows that in practice and in all practical work, we must always pay attention to correctly handling the relationship between thinking and existence and between subjectivity and objectivity, uphold materialism and knowability, and oppose idealism and agnosticism.