-
If it weren't for those few Zeiss lenses, Sony would be basically a layman for digital cameras
T700The appearance is really good, simple and elegant, beautiful and stylish, but no matter how it does, it can't change the fact that its anti-shake is useless, and the image quality is terrible The noise is super high at night or when the ISO is high, and ** unstable, sometimes with purple edges)
You may think it's fun at first with the touch screen, but after 5 minutes, when it's covered with fingerprints, you won't think so anymore The T700's battery is really frustrated, and it warped after less than 200 shots** And it's fully automatic, which is quite rigid
Now I've been using the Canon, but the 970 hasn't been used, but it's definitely stronger than the T700 The appearance is also good, it's very good-looking, and it also has some manual
Also, the 2nd floor is wrong, 970 is still a third-generation processor If you put aside the appearance, it can be said that none of the T series is cost-effective
-
Touchscreen love bad? Nothing!
Entertainment chooses Sony.
Practical choice canon.
-
I feel good about using Canon all the time, and the screen is a little smaller But the screen is smaller to save more power Canon's screen also has a lot of batteries The batteries are all fine, and the battery has no memory, so there is no need to charge it after using it, so there must be no problem with charging it before going out to play, and it is definitely enough
Sony's appearance is good, fashionable and lightweight, but I personally don't like the touch screen, it is inevitable that you will accidentally touch the screen in your hand, and it will affect the shooting effect if you don't know it.
-
Why did I ask twice, I'll copy mine again, this is not plagiarism, hehe.
You've analyzed it yourself, and the fact is that one pays more attention to appearance, and the other pays more attention to substance, depending on which one you like.
Personally, I think that digital cameras are mainly used for tourism For digital cameras, although the imaging is good and bad, but I am not a professional and can't see it, and the main thing is to pull the wind I bought the T700 washing ** is not bad as they say. There is a little bit of electricity consumption, but there is no problem with taking more than 200 **. It's really not enough for you to buy a battery, and it's not expensive.
-
Personally, I think Canon's is better. The Sony doesn't shoot night scenes very well, and the color is heavily reddish.
-
t700
Canon is a resin lens.
Sony is from Zeiss.
Nowadays, the field of digital cameras is divided into two camps, one is Canon Nikon, which produces its own lenses, and they do it well, and then make cameras. One is that Sony and Samsung are famous for doing electronics, and they use their own electronic technology advantages, plus lenses from other famous factories to produce cameras.
Buying a machine first determines what you can accept**, so it is more purposeful. If it is below 1500, there is nothing to provoke, entry-level, the manufacturer can save in terms of function and configuration, and it is almost the same. 1500-2000 yuan, there is a difference.
3000 upwards, you have to pick carefully.
1.The choice of brand.
There is no best brand, there are good machines in every brand. Don't blindly listen to the professional, the professional is good. But good machines are smashed out of money, Canon and Nikon's lenses are good, and they all know that there are tens of thousands of lenses, and the effect is indeed good.
But think about it, on a camera of about 2000, how good a lens can it use? Is it possible to use the technology and materials of tens of thousands of lenses on more than 2,000 machines?
2.Pick of pixels.
You don't have to think about this, unless you want to wash the oversized **. 5 million pixels can already be washed out to the size of A4 paper. Now the lowest digital camera on the market is 7 million, which is enough.
The choice of this is to look at the parameters, under the premise of the same pixels, the larger the size of the CCD, the better, the CCD is generally 1, and the better ones are 1 or larger.
3.Optical zoom.
The average is three times as much, enough for household use. If you like to shoot long-distance scenes, there are 6x, 7x, 10x, 12x, and 20x in the telephoto camera. Of course, the higher the multiplier, the higher the **.
4.Display screen.
The size of the display depends on personal preferences, the bigger it is, the cooler it looks, but the more power it consumes, and the higher it is. There is a certain gap between the display results of the display screen and **, because the display screen is only a temporary imaging.
-
It is recommended to choose the ixus960, or Canon's machine is more stable, and the shooting effect is better.
-
Personal advice and opinions for your reference:
Sony T77, T700, Canon IXUS870 machines, the most important imaging device photoreceptor chip CCD size is the same, 1 inch, although the number of images is slightly different, there is no major substantive difference in the actual imaging effect, basically different types, the same grade models.
Sony T77 and T700 are both card players with periscope lenses (caused by the peculiarity of lens construction), and the imaging effect is slightly lower than that of the Canon IXUS870 card player with telescopic lenses.
Sony T77, T700, Canon IXUS870 are fully automatic cameras, for a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments, can not be manually adjusted aperture, shutter and other parameters to obtain accurate **, but can cope with a variety of complex and changeable shooting environments through various shooting modes pre-made in the machine, but in the case of poor light, especially in shooting night scenes, it will be inadequate, but the general home models are fully competent.
In terms of practicality, Canon IXUS870 is higher, mainly with a 28mm wide angle, Sony T77, T700, Sony T77 is more cost-effective, and Sony T700 is more delicate and fashionable in appearance.
Sony T77, T700, Canon IXUS870 at this price, you may wish to pay attention to Sony W300, Canon IXUS980, Nikon S710** in 2400-2500 yuan or so, better performance, the main advantage is that the size of the sensor chip CCD is relatively large, about 1 inch, (Sony T77, T700, Canon IXUS870 is only 1 inch), the large size of the sensor chip with more than 10 million high resolutions, can really bring higher quality imaging resultsIn addition to a variety of shooting modes pre-made in the camera, it also has a comprehensive manual shooting function, which can be more integrated into the effect you want when shooting, and the fun and space of shooting will be greater, especially when shooting pure night photos, after manually adjusting **, aperture, ISO and other parameters, the photo picture effect is clear and clean without any noise, which is the so-called program mode (commonly known as fool mode) like night mode for Sony T77, T700, and Canon IXUS870 The imaging effect captured by the camera cannot be compared.
Canon A590IS, A650IS, A720IS, ** around 1300-2000 yuan, the performance is also better, the main advantage is that it is the same as Sony W300, Canon IXUS980, Nikon S710, with a comprehensive manual shooting function.
Among them, Canon A650is is better, the main advantage is that the CCD size of the sensor chip is relatively large, 1 inch, and the large size of the sensor chip with a high number of about 1200 million or more can really bring higher quality imaging results.
Buying a camera is the same as buying a computer, what suits you is the best, you can compare them according to your own price and preferences, and check the information on the Internet.
-
The T90 has a larger screen than the T700
and T77 a little bigger... The clarity is also relatively high... Because the pixels are relatively large.
But the T90 has only one battery... The T700 has two batteries (which can be used interchangeably), while the T77 has 4G of RAM
Oh.. T90 and T700
The memory is only 1g
Canon IXUS850i is too far ahead in photography, ISO has hit the requirements of the entry SLR, if it is in general life, T50 can be competent, if you are not a professional photographer (of course, professional ones buy SLR, these cameras are not considered) then the difference between the two is very small, Sony's is very fashionable, but Canon is still recommended, after all, Canon, Nikon is an expert in cameras, Sony is obviously a lower grade, but Sony's camera is very good.
Personal advice and opinions for your reference:
Sony T700 is a card player with a periscope lens (caused by the peculiarity of the lens structure), and the imaging effect is slightly lower than that of the telescopic lens (such as Sony's W) card machine. >>>More
Professional reviews of the T700 are not out yet and there are no references. >>>More
1st and 3rd floors... No, please don't mislead people by talking nonsense... What eliminates red eyes ... The charging prompt is made up in a mess.。。。
The 95 is also quite beautiful, and the imaging effect is also very good. The W220 is as large as the 95ccd, and raising the pixel (which is foolish) is not a good phenomenon and will only reduce the image quality.