SHOULD I CHOOSE A DIGITAL CAMERA SONY T700, SONY W170, CANON IXUS 870?

The wide-angle effect is better for shooting magnificent scenery and majestic buildings, atmospheric, the disadvantage is that any wide angle will have some pillow distortion, T700 is very suitable for little girls, built-in 4G storage is convenient. The IXUS 870 offers compromise performance.

I suggest you choose Panasonic, I personally feel good about it

I recommend the W170, which is the most suitable for the price point and features. The other two models are a little higher, but the functions are similar. As a home digital camera, the W170 is already excellent

I've used the 860 and the W170, and I can tell you for sure that you must choose a Canon camera when you buy a camera!! I'm using a W170 right now, so I can't keep up with the 860 at all!! Sony is good-looking,,, of course choose a good camera when you buy a camera!!

These three suggest that you choose 870!!

The T700 does not have a wide-angle feature. The highlights are just the form factor and the touch screen. It is recommended for girls or boys with slender fingers. It's easy to get started, and you can focus on which one is right!

The 870 has a wide angle and a telephoto function. The cost performance is definitely high. In terms of appearance, it is not much different from the brand's previous launches, and it is even inferior to Sony.

But it feels good to hold, and there is a special thumb position. Imaging is also the best in its class. Therefore, it is still recommended to buy this model.

T700 looks beautiful, exquisite workmanship (made in the original factory in Japan), does not have a wide angle, easy to carry, suitable for young people to go out to play and take it everywhere, but the cost performance is big.

The W170 looks beautiful, I think the workmanship is comparable to the T series (made in Wuxi), with a wide angle, suitable for home use, and it is very suitable for taking family photos. Outdoor performance is okay.

The ixus870 is not as cost-effective as the W170, and other performances are similar to the W170, with a wide angle. Canon's **lighter, Sony's**bright**, please choose for yourself.

If you don't know how to take pictures, we still recommend the T700. This machine is a fool's machine. Also, Sony's software is far easier to use than Canon, so you should pay attention to that.

The T700 doesn't seem to come with a wide angle. Personally, I have considered these models and like the T700The photo effect can basically meet the needs,If you are professional, choose a single reflex,The card machine is still T700。

Although Sony's is really beautiful......

However, if you want to buy a camera, I recommend the canon

The quality is relatively guaranteed, and the cost performance is relatively high......

T77 classic Sony design, very pleasing appearance, fashionable and exquisite, excellent picture performance.

Only the touch screen has no buttons, which is not conducive to one-handed photography, and it is easy to misoperate; The touch screen makes the operation slow to respond; There is no advantage in battery life itself, and the power consumption of the large screen is greater, generally less than 200 sheets (which is more serious in the card machine).

The T700 differs from the T77 in only three ways: the screen, the memory, and individual menu settings. The pros and cons are the same as those of the T77, and.

Pros, the screen is larger than the T77 ("), a staggering 920,000 pixels.

Downside, the stronger the screen, the more power consumption is of course :-)

W170 ordinary card, no advantages, if you have to say, Zeiss lens is one (at least not better than ordinary cards).

There are no obvious drawbacks, if I have to say, there is no macro, and it is also a problem that you can't use an SD card.

ixus 870is

Generally speaking, the excellent performance of the machine, except for Canon's usual low-end machine with a bit of a paste, is excellent in all aspects.

There are no significant drawbacks.

4 models in comparison,Sony and Canon 2 brands themselves are leading in the quality of consumer-grade DC,But there are still obvious differences in bias,Sony pays more attention to being in line with fashionable life (so the cost performance is absolutely low),Canon pays more attention to the balance of performance,More practical。

From this point of view,W170It can be ruled out,Not to mention anything else,Even Sony's basic design concept does not have,That is to say, Sony has no valuable place,Is it comparable to ixus in other aspects。

T700 and T77 are the same, T700 has 4G more memory than T77, if LZ you already have Sony's memory stick, then you can consider the trade-off, if not, you still don't think about T77, because memory sticks are not cheap.

Between the T700 and the 870, to be honest, the T700 has more detailed picture quality and more vivid colors.

**I always like to blow Canon to the sky, in fact, it's a bit exaggerated, Canon's low-end machine, there will be a gray feeling many times (more serious when you touch a little glare), and if the picture of Canon is not PS, it really doesn't look good if you wash it directly.

If you like to take pictures and go out a lot, I recommend you 870, mainly considering one battery reason, and the other touch screen is not as convenient and fast as the traditional buttons in operation.

In addition, if you are interested in PS photos, the 870 is more suitable (I personally feel that Sony's pictures have been processed in-camera).

Finally, Sony T's product positioning itself is a ** fashion product, and his design direction is aimed at high consumption, don't think too much, in fact, buying it is a way of life.

I've always used Canon, and my friends all use Canon, but if you don't care about Sony's price, I still recommend you T700, it's definitely a good thing, it's just expensive, and you can judge this for yourself.

I am a seller and professional repair of digital cameras, it is recommended to buy a Canon ixus870is digital camera, at present**mainland licensed**is around 2300, here I will not say more about the good and bad of Sony digital cameras. The repair situation says it all!

The point is that the image sensor of the Canon digital camera is fairly stable, and the color reproduction is excellent. Stabilization is good, with minimal (almost non-existent) rework. Canon is a professional manufacturer of cameras and digital cameras, and is the world's leading manufacturer of digital cameras.

Every detail of the digital camera has been done in a way that no other manufacturer can match. (To be clear, I'm not Canon's to; It is just an answer based on more than 20 years of experience in camera use and maintenance and nearly 8 years of accumulation of digital technology. ）

Of course, 870 pulls, I use it very well, the key is to try the feel of it, everyone has a preference.

Support Canon's Sony's things are expensive, Canon's more professional and cost-effective.

Then what do you do? If it's entertainment. If you only like the appearance, use the T700.

If you want to take photos professionally, it is recommended that you use Canon and Nikon.

Don't buy Samsung's, the imaging is not as good as Sony's, Samsung is multi-function and multi-point. Sony's T-series is good-looking, and the performance is not very bad, but the imaging is really not as good as the Canon, but it is definitely better than the Samsung. However, looking at your question, you should be at home, it is recommended that you buy Sony T700, which is definitely the flagship of flagships, and it is the king of Sony's card players.

I've been watching it for a long time, and today I finally bought the T700, absolutely shocking!! I bought it in Nanchang store, 2388, send film, tripod, a not very good bag, a card reader of Pinsheng, and spend 280 to buy an original battery. This ** is definitely worth selling in the store, after all, there is a sense of security when you buy it in the store.

Really!

Blues NV33

I've been using it for several years and it's working great.

NV3 has many functions, Sony's imaging is good, NV3 can be on top of MP4 plus camera.

I don't know about anything else, but I advise you not to buy the T700, hey! It's too late to regret it now. The key is that the battery is not good, every time the battery is charged, it will be out of power for a maximum of 3 hours, and the canon bought by a friend can be used for at least 6 hours or more ...... when fully charged

The T-series is ultra-thin. The battery is not durable.

How can the W170 have a larger lens???

The meaning of the first floor is that the W170 is a 28mm wide-angle lens, right? Hehe.

The 960 and W170 are hardly a grade of products.

The image quality of the Canon 960 is higher than that of the W170.

First of all, because the CCD size of the 960 is 1 inch, while the W170 is about 1 inch. The larger the CCD size, the better the imaging.

Secondly, although the W170 is a wide-angle 28mm and a 5x optical zoom, the lens distortion and noise control are worse than those of the 960.

The 960 is the best imaging in a card machine. Color reproduction is good, and white balance is accurate.

If you are looking for imaging quality, the Canon 960 is recommended

The Canon is better, but the W170 lens is larger.

The Sony may have a slightly more beautiful appearance than the Canon.

It's better to buy Canon, after all, it's an old factory, professional!

Let's choose one from IXUS 110IS, G10, Panasonic LX3,As for which one to choose, it depends on whether you focus on the landscape or both portraits and landscapes. This is determined by the focal length of these two types of cameras, the focal length of the LX3 is 24-60mm, which is very good for taking pictures, and the 24mm super wide angle, but if you want to shoot portraits, it is worse, and the best focal length for portrait close-ups is 50-130mm

The focal length of the Canon G10 is 28-140mm, although the wide-angle end is almost 28mm, but it is also a standard wide-angle, and the focal length of the G10 is very suitable for portrait shooting. 110is has a focal length of 28-110, slightly worse, there is no RAW format, the aperture is not constant but** is more moderate, 2300, the first two are above 3200.

As for the other aspects, they are all DC consumer-grade cameras, and the difference will not be much different in terms of quality. So it's important to focus on what you focus on.

If you just look at the photo effect, it is estimated that the Canon 870 is better than the T700, but if you look at the appearance and operation aspects, the T700 is definitely stronger. Needless to say, the shape of the T700 is very exquisite, elegant, thin and compact. The screen is 920,000 pixels, which is four times that of the general camera screen, and the display is delicate and shocking.

The touch screen is sensitive and convenient to operate. A variety of scene modes, night shooting, fireworks effects, etc., the imaging effect is very good, of course, you have to operate it yourself, if you choose the automatic mode, you can't find a good effect in some environments, it is recommended to use the program automatic. Built-in 4G memory, the highest pixel shooting, 10M photos can be stored nearly 1,000 photos, you don't need to buy a card.

The lens of the T700 is also very good, with 10.1 million pixels, quadruple zoom, and the camera image is more vivid, but it may lose its sense of realism, and it looks good when it is not good-looking, and Canon's is more realistic.

I use it is t700, I am talking about my own feelings, I am very satisfied, it is pleasing to the eye, I have asked many people, and those who have bought it have no regrets.

sony

W170 wide angle is also OK,T700,T900Take the pounding with brakes,Canon to the machine is quite comprehensive,Panasonic LX3 I think it's also quite good,In fact, there are too many household risks to pay attention to the place,It's quite versatile and can't be used in ordinary times,The difference between them and the imaging effect will not be surprising,I used to do photography for a while,You wash out the photos are washed by a professional machine,Before the photo studio corrected the color grading,And then to the place where the photos are washed,They then go on the large machine to correct the color grading again,The master adjusts it well, and you can resist the ** wash out and resist the effect, but this has only a little bit of an impact on the quality of the camera, so it depends on which machine you like.

Sony is basically a "fool" type, and Canon and Panasonic have more ...... functionsCan be manual! Of the two, you can choose Canon! There are parameters on the Internet, you can go and see it!

Canon G10, LX3 are in the same class.

The picture quality is outstanding. It's up to you to choose.

If you want the machine to look good, the picture quality is still excellent.

Personally, I think the LX3 is completely two notches higher than the machines you listed earlier, and there is no comparison.

Actually, if you just take photos of life, you can buy one under 1000. Since you are willing to spend money, it is recommended to buy Fujifilm F100, which is recognized as the first recommended model of the card category in 08, about 1800. ps:

Sony's cameras can't be sold in Japan at all, they are all deceived in China, the best-selling is Panasonic Fujifilm, and Canon also wants to look at their backs, of course, this refers to the consumer field other than SLR. If you have doubts about what I say, you can check it on the Internet and have the courage to accept the doubts of my comrades.

Reasons to choose the Sony W170: easy to operate, sleek appearance (also available in different colors), lightweight appearance, and a wide angle of 28mm.

Reasons for choosing the Canona 650: The CCD size is larger than the Sony W170, so the imaging is good; Fully manual operation; The rotatable LCD screen is practical in special shooting conditions; With a No. 5 AA battery, it is easy to buy and you won't miss a shot due to a lack of power.

1. The final quality of the film is related to the CCD size of the camera, and the camera should not simply pursue high image number, but should choose a camera with a large CCD size. (The CCD size of A650 is greater than that of W170, and imaging A650 is superior).

2. The function of wide angle is to use a shorter focal length to achieve the effect of a larger viewing angle. The purpose of using a wide-angle lens is to achieve a wider field of view. With a wide angle, you can shoot a wider range in a small space (the W170 has the advantage in terms of wide angle) (but there is a certain amount of distortion in the wide angle, depending on whether it is within your acceptable range).

If you rarely use a manual gear, then the W170 should be suitable for you, after all, the small body, easy to carry, and the picture quality is still quite good. Canon's A-series cameras are characterized by full manual operation, which allows you to fully enjoy the fun of manual shooting, and is a hands-on model for the introduction of SLR, and the image quality of the A650 is also better than that of the average card machine, so if you like photography and pursue better picture quality, then the A650 is a good choice.

In the end, which one to choose depends on the needs of the landlord, I hope it can help you.