Which one to choose, Canon 40D or Nikon D90? Hesitant

Operationally, the D90 is definitely more than 40D, but the D90's shell is plastic, so the durability is not very good (I used the D70 before, and I accidentally broke in two places, which is very distressing).

I think that the picture quality of D90 and 40D has basically reached the top, no need to compare.

ps:1,The so-called higher than the pixel,In my opinion, there is no big need.。 Who has nothing to do with the big wall every day. 1000W pixels can basically be printed as A3

2,The picture texture is not who says which one is good,It depends on your personal preferences,Recently, I found that the old canon lens hung on the Nikon camera to shoot the effect is very good。 But I don't like the feeling of the picture of the canon DSLR. (Most of the online samples are processed by computers, don't take it seriously, you will be very depressed if you can't shoot it yourself).

3. In terms of lenses, I think the Nikkor lenses will get higher and higher, which has something to do with system planning, and if you plan to continue to add lenses, you should consider the lens investment.

I have nikon, canon, and minolta, and I am familiar with all three equipment, and they all have love and hate, so I won't favor one or the other.

This review is more detailed, go check it out.

If you like it, it's not bad to be on the D90 It's just that it doesn't look like a big upgrade has added some innovative features, such as camera, HDMI interface, and support GPS module.

I don't know much about imaging, I haven't used it, it's hard to say, ha, the landlord can be a guinea pig electronic products to buy new things instead of old ones.

One of the most important factors in DSLR is not the body, but the lenses that are configured accordingly.

Canon's L-heads are generally of good quality and are generally much more affordable than Nikon's gold hoop heads.

40D is a very good machine, D90 is also a new good machine, they have their own strengths, 40D machine texture is better, pixels and functions slightly inferior to D90; The D90 has just hit the market, and it's not cost-effective, but the extra features for recording HDVs are very creative.

In summary, it is recommended to go to the canon 40d.

I just bought a 40d and it feels good Magnesium alloy is also comfortable in my hand.

The Cannon's handling is also good, but you'll have to get used to it a bit as you get used to Nikon.

And Canon's similar lenses are also lower than Nikon**, of course, if you can't spend all of them, it's a different story.

90 I have the same doubts as you After thinking about it for a long time ago, I think D90 is a very playable machine I can shoot some unprecedented ** The set of lenses is also more cost-effective I'm going to buy one on Wednesday.

40d is also good, cost-effective, I won't regret which one I bought, it depends on personal preference.

It's not a grade.

The positioning of products produced by major SLR manufacturers will be spaced apart.