Please use the viewpoint of historical materialism to explain the struggle between Chu and Han

Updated on history 2024-05-28
20 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I have read previous history books, which are said to be historical materialism, and the most important one is that Xiang Yu did not engage in the county system but engaged in the feudal system, which was an act of restoring the slavery system and turning back the clock of history, and this behavior was not supported by the landlord class and the great people who were still revolutionary at that time; However, Liu Bang implemented the county system and continued the reform of feudal society, which was responded to by the landlord class and the masses of the people, and conformed to the historical trend, so he won.

    Ignore it, when Liu Bang was alive, the Han Dynasty was also divided into feudal systems. Besides, before winning the world, it doesn't seem to matter if Wang Xiang Yu and Liu Bang are sealed or not, Han Xin's matter is more telling.

    Almighty historical materialism has since become historical mechanism, and history has been left with nothing to study.

    It is the legendary historical crisis of Chinese mainland several times. So.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Liu Bang advocated feudal unification and was progressive. Xiang Yu practiced the feudal system, and his political concept was relatively backward.

    Liu Bang won the hearts of the people, and the times created heroes. Xiang Yu is a military talent and politically naïve.

    Liu Bang has a relatively stable Guanzhong as the rear, and the food and military resources are relatively sufficient, so he has no worries. Xiang Yu did not have a stable consolidated rear.

    Liu Bang was able to pay attention to the organic combination of various forms of struggle. Xiang Yu was committed to his personal and simple military operations.

    Liu Bang can use strategy correctly and fight wits with Xiang Yu. Xiang Yu won the battle and was strategically passive.

    Liu Bang is good at employing people, and can unite the forces opposing Xiang Yu from all over the country to make his own strength change from weak to strong. Xiang Yu was superstitious about force and stubborn for his own use, which led to the rebellion of the people.

    This is my teacher's point of view, wrong to go to her.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    At the same time that Xiang Yu annihilated the main force of the Qin army, Liu Bang also entered Guanzhong westward and reached Xianyang, and Prince Ying of Qin surrendered to Liu Bang. Liu Bang abolished the Qin Law and had three chapters of the Civil Law, which won the popularity of the people. Subsequently, Xiang Yu also immediately entered the customs, and after entering Xianyang, he wantonly burned and looted.

    In the fait accompli of the kings, he established himself as the overlord of Western Chu.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Liu Bang's advantages are accumulated little by little, and he admits that Liu Bang has a great personality charm.

    The time and place are favorable, Liu Bang occupies the geographical advantage, and there is character and luck as the backing, these 2 points won Xiang Yu, half and half of the people and the aspect, how Xiang Yu was violent in the later Liu Bang had the final say, at least after the defeat, there were Jiangdong fathers waiting for Xiang Yu to go back...

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    With the development of the productive forces, the feudal society will definitely replace the slave society, and Xiang Yu is engaged in the ruling model of the slave society of cronyism and feudal system, which is a retrogression.

    Liu Bang is engaged in a feudal social rule model of centralization and meritocracy, which is progress.

    Of course, Liu Bang is going to win Xiang Yu.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Don't be obsessed with 'brother' 'brother' is just a legend...

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The main viewpoints of historical materialism are: social existence determines social consciousness, and social consciousness has an active reaction to social existence; Social consciousness also has its relative independence, which promotes the development of social existence when it is superior to social existence, and hinders the development of social existence when it is inferior to social existence. The economic base determines the superstructure, the economy is the material foundation, the cultural system, the political system, and ideology are the superstructure, and the superstructure also has a dynamic reaction to the economic base.

    At the same time, the people are the main body of society, the creators of social wealth and the changers of society, and they must follow the mass line, and the reform of the cultural system is also to build the culture of the people.

    It depends on the score to determine how many answer points, and generally this matter determines consciousness is the main scoring point).

    Hope it helps.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    The most important aspect of the materialist view is to look at and analyze things from an objective and developmental perspective. Social hotspots are no exception.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Social existence determines social consciousness. The role of values.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    From my own point of view, the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will inevitably be reunified. There are several reasons for this:

    First, China's historical tradition has always been that harmony must be separated for a long time, and that harmony must be made for a long time. From the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period to the unification of Qin Shi Huang, from the Two Han Dynasty to the Three Kingdoms, from the Wei, Jin, Southern and Northern Dynasties to the Sui and Tang Dynasties. The development of Chinese history has always been, and until modern times, this is evidenced by the development of Chinese history.

    Second, Taiwan has been an inalienable part of China's territory since ancient times, and there have been many control agencies in Taiwan in ancient times, such as the establishment of the Taiwan Prefecture in the Qing Dynasty, which is under the jurisdiction of Fujian Province. In addition, the Cairo Conference held during World War II and other meetings affirmed that the one-China principle is upheld and that Taiwan is a sacred and inviolable part of China's territory.

    Third, China's application of the "one country, two systems" policy in resolving the Hong Kong and Macao issues provides a good example for resolving the Taiwan issue.

    Fourth, the Chinese people have a strong national cohesion and centripetal force, and the Chinese people strongly demand the reunification of the motherland and territorial integrity.

    Fifth, since the founding of New China, China has made tremendous contributions to the reunification of the motherland.

    Sixth, the scientific theory of the scientific outlook on development is guided.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The historical trend is that if you are long, you will be divided, and if you are separated for a long time, you will be together. Reunifying Taiwan and fighting a war is the next policy, and they are all Chinese. The best way is to make Taiwan inseparable from China, without which China's economy will decline, and the common people will naturally be unwilling to become independent.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    It must be unified, that's for sure.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Social existence determines social consciousness, and social consciousness is relatively independent.

    The economic base determines the superstructure.

    The masses of the people are the main body of practice and the creators of history.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    I choose DWhat is dialectical materialism? There is a first nature, and consciousness is the second nature.

    Historical materialism is a great breakthrough in Marxism, and its basic viewpoint is that social existence is the first nature and social consciousness is secondary.

    Is that understandable?

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    1. Social existence and social consciousness 2. Movement of basic contradictions in society 3. General trend of social development 4. The masses of the people have created history 5. Mass viewpoint and mass line.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The core of a businessman is to make profits, once he wants to seek personal interests in a broader space, he will use the existing capital in his hands to unscrupulously get a position for himself, and then use a position in exchange for greater returns. Power is not the ultimate pursuit of businessmen, but a means in exchange for maximum benefits, and this means has a strong harm to society, which is more reflected in the destruction and challenge of the existing regime.

    Businessmen seek power with the intention of making profits. The nature of businessmen is to pursue greater interest space, their pursuit of power is only temporary, just looking for the value of power in businessmen, their pursuit of power is to develop power, use power, let power become rights, once the value of power itself is lost, businessmen will be like discarding an abandoned woman, ruthlessly placed on the side of the road.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The reasons for insisting on the dominant position of the masses of the people from its historical materialist perspective:

    Man is the subject of social history;

    The masses of the people are the creators of the material wealth of the society, and the people are the creators of the spiritual wealth of the society;

    The masses of the people are the decisive force for social change.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Due to the further deepening of quantum theory, the viewpoint of historical materialism urgently needs to be supplemented to make it more complete and comprehensive.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    And dialectical materialism!

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    "Historical materialism" holds that history is a natural formation. It advocates resigning to fate and going with the flow. The development of world history is not synchronized with the proof:

    History is not determined by material, but by people, and man is the real driving force of historical development. The history of the development of human society is not arranged by "God", but is the choice of human beings themselves. According to the thesis of "historical materialism" that the "primary stage of socialism" was introduced, with this assertion, it is possible to justify mistakes and prove that mistakes are determined by matter and are not subject to human will.

Related questions
5 answers2024-05-28

Historical materialismThe basic point of view: >>>More

7 answers2024-05-28

Let's make a few points.

The dialectical materialist view of matter rejects the idealist view that matter is secondary, which means that dialectical materialism is an attribute of "materialism". Secondly, dialectical materialism abandons the individual, vague, and concrete understanding of matter in naïve materialism, and abandons the mechanical and metaphysical understanding of matter in mechanical materialism. Generally speaking, dialectical materialism holds that matter is the origin of the world, and the consciousness derived from it is subject to matter but has its own agency. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-28

Materialism believes that there are always things that we can't do. >>>More

6 answers2024-05-28

The dialectical materialist view of matter is that the physical object and the material are nothing more than the sum of all kinds of things, and the concept of matter is abstracted from this sum. Matter is the philosophical category that marks the objective reality that man perceives through his senses, which exists independently of our senses, and is reproduced, photographed, and reflected by our senses. The material category of philosophy is defined by the relationship between matter and consciousness. >>>More

9 answers2024-05-28

The basic feature of the dialectical materialist view of nature is the unity of materialism and dialectics. >>>More