If the United States does not reinstate sanctions on Iran for the time being, what are the terrible

Updated on international 2024-05-20
21 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Abstract] The United States ** Trump issued a statement on the 12th saying that the sanctions exemption period for the Iranian nuclear issue was extended for the last time. This means that the United States has not opted out of the JCPOA for the time being. Trump's statement called the JCPOA "catastrophically flawed" and demanded that the U.S. Congress and European countries agree to amend the terms of the deal to include restrictions on Iran's missile program.

    Trump stressed that the extension of sanctions waivers on Iran's nuclear issue is a "last chance" for European countries to agree to revise the JCPOA. If the agreement that the United States expects is not reached, the United States will "withdraw from the agreement immediately."

    1.On the same day, the U.S. Treasury Department announced new sanctions against Iran, including 14 individuals and businesses, for "human rights violations." According to the relevant regulations, every 120 days, the United States** will determine whether to extend the sanctions exemption period for the Iranian nuclear issue.

    In October, Mr. Trump said he refused to confirm to Congress that Iran was complying with the JCPOA.

    2.On the 12th, Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif responded through social media ** that Trump's policy and latest statement violated the terms of the JCPOA, that the JCPOA cannot be renegotiated, and that the United States should fully fulfill its commitments like Iran. The European Union issued a statement saying that it had taken note of Trump's statement and would further evaluate it.

    Prior to this, the EU has always reiterated its determination to uphold and implement the JCPOA.

    Conclusion] In July 2015, Iran reached a comprehensive agreement with the six countries on the Iranian nuclear issue. According to the agreement, Iran pledged to limit its nuclear program, and the international community would lift sanctions against Iran. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) is responsible for monitoring Iran's compliance with the agreement, and has issued several reports confirming Iran's compliance with the agreement.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    On January 12, local time, the White House announced that it would not resume economic sanctions on Iran for the time being, and asked its European allies to reach a new agreement on the Iranian nuclear issue within 120 days, otherwise the United States would withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal. On the same day, the U.S. Treasury Department announced new sanctions against 14 individuals and entities involved in Iran.

    Trump said in a statement released by the White House that the United States would not reinstate economic sanctions on Iran for the time being because of a consensus with America's European allies that it would repair the "terrible flaws" of the Iran nuclear deal. But he also warned that "this is the last chance" and that the United States will withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal if the consensus no longer exists. Trump angered other signatories on the 13th by refusing to confirm Iran's compliance with the Iran nuclear deal, forcing the US Congress and allies to try to find a way to save the deal.

    Trump warned on the 13th that he would withdraw from the Iran nuclear deal if Congress and U.S. allies could not find a way to fix the flaws in the Iran nuclear deal he proposed.

    Tillerson said he and U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis both believe it is in the national interest of the United States to remain in the Iran nuclear deal. He added that the goal of the new approach is to find other ways to address weaknesses in the Iran nuclear deal that both Iran and European signatories have said cannot be renegotiated. When Trump came to power, he took a tough stance on Iran.

    According to an earlier report by overseas networks, Trump said on the 13th that Iran violated the spirit of the Iran nuclear deal, and the agreement is no longer in line with the national interests of the United States. The United States will impose further sanctions on Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps, and the White House will push for congressional legislation to further strengthen the nuclear deal or impose tougher sanctions on Iran.

    On the same day, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said it confirmed that Iran is fully implementing all its commitments under the Iran nuclear deal. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Friday confirmed that Iran is fully implementing all its commitments under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA); At the same time, it was stressed that Iran is undergoing "the world's most reliable verification of nuclear behavior" from the agency.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    For the sake of profit, Trump is a businessman, and if it hurts the profit, of course he wants to withdraw.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    As we all knowThe United States against IranWhat is the purpose of the sanctions imposed. What Iran has and what the United States needs. Indeed, for the United States, the presence of Iranian oil in the international market is to prevent it from becoming realThe oil hegemon of the worldof stumbling blocks.

    It is only necessary for the unrest of Iranian society to affect itOil exportsOther countries, for the United States, is a big benefit.

    Former United StatesObamaLet the United States sign the "Iran Nuclear Deal" with Iran, Russia, China, Germany, the United Kingdom, and France, so that the world's oil ****, to a certain extent, to contain Russia, but also make the United States oil extremely low, not easy to exploit American oil. ExitIran Nuclear Dealand the re-imposition of sanctions on Iran is tantamount to putting Iran on the path of a new round for some Central European countries. The United States is far stronger than Iran in both military and economic terms, and the purpose of sanctioning Iran is also Iran's rich oil reserves.

    In the face of such a powerful United States, how Iran will cope is indeed a big problem.

    But Iran is not out of nowhere, there are many other countries sanctioned by the United States, and Iran actually has experience to learn from. But not all methods are suitable for Iran, and Iran needs to consider carefully. First of all, it is certain that a country should become an oil hegemon, control its own economy, and the energy lifeline is something that no country wants to see.

    To stop the U.S. sanctions on Iran, Iran needs the support and help of other countries. At this stage, Iran can be fromVenezuelaLooking for experience, the dollar is the world's currency, if you want not to be sanctioned, then use less dollars, how to use less dollars, that is, reduce imports.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    If Iran wants to get rid of US sanctions, it can only develop its own strength so that the United States does not dare to despise it.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    The sanctions against them have indeed taken effect, so Iran will naturally find other ways to solve them.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    I guess I want to get rid of the US sanctions, but there seems to be no good solution at the moment.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    For Iran, perhaps the only way to cope is to continue research and development.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I think Iran should go under Russia's wing and let Russia protect it.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Keep doing what you are doing now, and you can only be strong if you are tough.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    It's not clear about this, but how to deal with it is Iran's business.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    1.The United States intends to withdraw from the nuclear deal and at the same time begin to reimpose economic sanctions on Iran, and continue to hit Iran's newly recovered economy, which will be further dragged down in the event of a war if the Iranian economy is damaged. At present, Iran's economic situation is only just improving, and the economic sanctions of the previous decade have caused too much damage to it, and once the sanctions are re-imposed, new problems will arise.

    2.provoked Saudi Arabia and Israel to strike at Iran and Syria. Israel has long been preparing for war against Iran and Syria, but its boss, the United States, has not agreed. Once the United States withdraws from the nuclear deal, it will be a tacit acquiescence to Israel's strikes against Iran and Syria.

    3.Losing its strategic alliance Syria, once Syria cannot get the support of Iran, and Russia does not dare to make a move, then the United States wants to strike at the Russian-led Shiite arc in the Middle East has an effect, which can protect its hegemony and oil pricing power. Therefore, the United States has concluded that tightening sanctions against Iran will be more effective, and even have the effect of killing two birds with one stone.

    Specifically from [Seven Points], some of the analysis is not bad, you can close it, and you can learn a lot. )

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    The national question should be decided by the Iraqi people themselves! The withdrawal of troops may lead to social turmoil in Iraq.1 It should be the withdrawal of troops, and it should wait until Iraq is safe and stable, and ** has the ability to deal with the contradictions within Iraq! This national problem is not easy to solve!

    The Iraqi people should be the last deciders!

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    The JCPOA is entirely the product of the weak compromise of the Obama Democratic Party in the United States, and the deal is the result of a policy of appeasement towards Iran.

    Pro-Jewish forces in Israel and the United States are extremely unhappy with this.

    The United States wants to scrap the JCPOA in order to renew the maximum international pressure on Iran, and at the same time, the Syrian battlefield is dragging down Iran's economy and promoting internal divisions in Iran.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The U.S. sanctions against Iran are multifaceted, covering military, financial, petroleum and other fields, causing huge economic losses to Iran and affecting the development of its people's livelihood.

    Iran has been subject to UN-imposed sanctions since 2006. And after 2012,The United States has imposed oil and financial sanctions on Iran.

    The importance of oil to Iran cannot be overstated. As a country with relatively few other resources, Iran relies heavily on the oil market for its wealth. And the United States directly starts from this root:

    Other countries are prohibited from importing oil from Iran, otherwise sanctions will be imposed on these countries as well. Iran's path to prosperity will not work.

    Without the profits brought by oil, Iran's economic situation will definitely continue to deteriorate, and the development of the whole country will be greatly restricted.

    As for the financial aspect, the United States has been even more ruthless. As we all know, the U.S. dollar is the world's common currency, and the international currency is pegged to the U.S. dollar, and the United States has restricted Iran's international currency, making it impossible to conduct money transactions internationally, and the exported goods cannot be sold, nor can they import goods. Iran has therefore bartered and bartered directly.

    It is conceivable that this is a heavy blow to Iran's economy. Many of Iran's livelihood problems are closely related to US sanctions. Militarily, the United States has stationed itself in the waters of the Persian Gulf to play a role in deterring force; In retaliation, Iran blocked the Strait of Hormuz, cutting off important U.S. routes at sea.

    Tensions between the two countries remain high, and in November 2019, the United States announced the reimposition of sanctions on Iran.

    After a long struggle, both countries have actually suffered losses of varying degrees, and Iran is almost stagnant (of course, it is inseparable from their own efforts), and the Iranian people are even more miserable.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    The United States has always had a very bad relationship with Iran, and it has often imposed sanctions on Iran. In the process of US sanctions against Iran, Iran has been greatly affected, first of all, the fluctuation of Iran's oil industry, which has led to a significant increase in the pressure on Iran's economy. The second is that the development of Iran's military equipment has been greatly affected.

    Finally, economic reforms in Iran have been interrupted.

    The first is that Iran's oil industry has been greatly affected. Because Iran is the world's 5th largest oil producer, its oil industry is one of its most important. After the US imposed sanctions on Iran, Iran's oil industry was greatly affected.

    The main thing is that Iran's oil exports have been greatly affected. As a result, the pressure on the domestic economy began to increase.

    The second is that Iran is more dependent on imports for its military equipment. Because Iran does not have a strong ability to produce first-class equipment, nor does it have the ability to develop first-class equipment. As a result, the development of military equipment in Iran has come to a halt due to the decline in the country's economic income.

    After all, the army's consumption of a country's economic capacity is still very large, coupled with the US blockade of Iran, which leads to Iran's ** equipment can only be transported by land.

    Finally, Iran is undergoing economic reforms and is vigorously developing its own banking industry. However, due to the impact of US sanctions, many European countries have had to withdraw their money from Iranian banks, which has had a very serious impact on Iran's domestic economic reform measures. After all, if Iran wants to carry out economic reforms, it must have a lot of foreign financial support.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    Hegemony is denied. The United States has constantly sanctioned Iran because of its own interests, but Iran has not violated the law, and the United Nations has done a very good job of saying no to hegemony.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    Those who have attained the Tao have much help, and those who have lost the Tao have little help. Even Britain, France, and Germany, the allies of the United States, have made it clear that the United States has "withdrawn from the group," so there is no legal basis for the US demands.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    For the United States, it means that the United States' dream of global hegemony has been ruthlessly shattered, and it has no power to fight back.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    It means that the influence of the United States in the United Nations has decreased. In the past, the United Nations was basically dominated by the United States, but now other countries are becoming more and more influential.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    In response to the United States' request for a quick resumption of sanctions against Iran, in the voting process, only the United States and Dominica expressed their approval, while China and Russia both voted against, and the other 11 members all chose to abstain. There are more forces to counterbalance the United States.

    As can be seen from the results of this vote, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, which were allies of the United States in the past, did not vote in favor of the United States on the side of the United States, which is an unprecedented diplomatic and political defeat for the United States. However, the "threat" of the United States to some countries has not been able to bring these countries to its knees, and it can be said that the United States has reached the point of "isolation" this time.

    After the revotion, if the Security Council cannot rule within 30 days to agree to the continued invalidity of the sanctions against Iran, then the sanctions will be back in effect, but the result is also very happy for us, 13 of the 15 members of the Security Council believe that the United States has withdrawn from the "Iran nuclear deal" and has no right to initiate this vote, and this "retreat" move is also illegal.

    This year, with the development of various countries in the world and the rise of developing countries, before resolving some international disputes, it is no longer like it once obeyed the orders of a single country, and the sanctions and hegemonic acts of the United States are no longer approved by the international community. The American-style "era of bullying" is long gone, and now there are more and more forces that can unite to resist this hegemonic politics practiced by a single country.

    The United States has stubbornly pursued its policy of imposing "sanctions" on some countries, which has already violated the basic norms of international law, and it will not support such erroneous behavior of the United States because of some of its "threatening remarks." America's "heavy-handed tactics" are no longer applicable in this diverse international world.

Related questions
22 answers2024-05-20

The United States is still supporting him, but it is no longer useful. >>>More

18 answers2024-05-20

Because Vietnam has the support of China. Before the war, China warned the United States**, which caused the United States to never dare to let go of the attack on Vietnam. And the South Vietnamese ** supported by the United States is too bad.

8 answers2024-05-20

Can you drink kudzu powder for trauma.

15 answers2024-05-20

Don't blindly pursue large companies when looking for intermediaries, like some small intermediary companies such as smart study abroad is better than large institutions, teachers are one-on-one with students, can formulate their own study abroad programs according to the characteristics of students, make targeted plans for students, write their own characteristic documents, and be open and transparent.

8 answers2024-05-20

It's hard to say, depending on what kind of teacher you've met. If the teacher you meet is not experienced enough, or is completely unprofessional and foolish, then of course there will be such a problem. In addition, I need to explain to you that it has little to do with the institution and has a direct relationship with the teacher in charge of you. >>>More