Is it a loss of personal freedom to be law abiding?

Updated on society 2024-05-02
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Law is the bottom line of human behavior, and no country in the world has absolute freedom, and it is formulated according to their different national conditions. The so-called democratic freedoms are all democracy and freedom in accordance with the law. Only under the premise of abiding by discipline and law can there be democracy and freedom, and violating discipline and law will definitely lose freedom, and in serious cases, political rights will be deprived.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    There is no conflict between obedience to the law and the loss of personal freedom. Because yours is a personal freedom, and you must be free within the scope of the law, you must not transgress the boundaries of the law. If you cross the boundaries of the law, then you are not free. Rather, it was indulged.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    No, law-abiding is something that everyone should abide by, and it has nothing to do with personal freedom.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    The real way to do it is what everyone should do, not to lose personal freedom. I have learned that abiding by the law is a thing that every citizen should do. So, obey the law.

    It was I who lost my freedom, but who did me a great benefit.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    I think there is nothing to do with abiding by the law and losing personal freedom, because there must be a degree to be a person and do things, if there is no degree, then people will indulge themselves, then there will be no rules, I think it will be all messed up.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The law protects individual freedoms.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    I'm sticking with you! Let me give you a few arguments:

    1: As the old saying goes, there are no rules, there is no circle, so discipline is a must.

    2: The definition of freedom is premised, only freedom on a certain basis is the freedom that can truly serve the people, and if the limits of freedom are expanded without limit, it is a harm. For example, talk casually in class, and beat him up after class to see who is not happy.

    He is free to do whatever he wants. But this unfettered freedom is detrimental to the interests of others. So freedom must be built on a certain foundation!

    For example, discipline, and even national law.

    Let me tell you one more, the country has national laws, classes have class rules, what does the zoo have??

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    There are no rules, no rules, no absolute freedom. Discipline will greatly protect our freedom. Imagine that everyone is absolutely free, so will the freedom of others affect their own freedom at the same time? In the end, it is not free.

Related questions
4 answers2024-05-02

Dear leaders, teachers, and dear students:

Good morning, everyone! >>>More

4 answers2024-05-02

Comply with social morality and fill in as follows: Language civilization self-use Mandarin, consciously use civilized language; The language is affinity, mainly appreciative and motivating; Don't use foul language, swear words, don't hurt people, don't be sarcastic or sarcastic. Civilized manners: >>>More

3 answers2024-05-02

Dear teachers and students:

If the mistake is not corrected in time, then it is difficult to say that the person will become a law-abiding person when he grows up. >>>More

8 answers2024-05-02

First of all, you will not be prosecuted by the law.

Secondly, if you can bring the people around you, you will be happy. >>>More