Let s simply say that existence is reasonable , right?

Hegel's "Being is Reason".

Hegel may not have known that this sentence was swallowed without difficulty in China, a country that Lu Xun considered to have a serious spirit, and digested it into the meaning that Hegel mentioned that he did not want to be misunderstood. The significance of the correction of people's digestion is not to look for the poor source and author, but to think not of Hegel but of a cultural psychology contained in this sentence. However, the meaning of correction lies in the need for people to think of Hegel and mixed with Western speculative thinking, which is the whole of meaning, and the meaning of correcting all misunderstandings of famous sayings from the West is also in the meaning.

Hegel's sentence is only mentioned because he has not systematically studied Hegel's thought

In fact, the whole sentence is "whatever is reasonable is real, and whatever is true is reasonable". The word "real" here and the first line of "existence" is a German word, and in order to clear up the misunderstanding of ordinary people, Mr. Zhang Shiying translated it as "real". Teacher Zhang explained:

This so-called reality is not something that can be touched and seen in general, everything in the world now is called reality. "Some people understand Hegel's reality as everything, whether it is good or bad, whether the chair is like a chair or not, whether the portrait is not like a friend, whether the portrait is not a work of art, even if I draw a four-like, it is a work of art, it is real, and it is reasonable anyway. "Hegel believed that only what is necessary is true reality.

The next paragraph will continue to explain "real" in conjunction with "reasonable").

What does it mean to be reasonable? This principle is a logical concept, and reasonable is a logical concept. That is to say, whatever conforms to a logical concept is true, and whatever is true is a logical concept.

He (Hegel) gave an example: For example, in our colloquial language, we often say that this friend is a real friend, a real friend, but that friend is not a real friend, what is the reason for this? According to Hegel's proposition (which refers to the first sentence of the second paragraph, 'whatever is reasonable is real, and whatever is real is reasonable'), this real friend fits the concept of friendship.

If we assume that the definition of the concept of friendship means sharing adversity, helping each other, and helping each other in times of need, then this is indeed what this friend does, and this is a concrete and real true friend, because his actions are in line with the concept of friendship. On the other hand, if a person says nice things to his face and sticks a knife in the back, he is not a true friend because his behavior does not conform to the concept of friendship. ”

Now let's explain another sentence, 'Everything that is reasonable is true'. His so-called 'reason' and 'concept' are not concepts of formal logic, but active and creative concepts, and everything that is reasonable and in line with the concept must be realized, so everything that is reasonable is real. ”

It's not reasonable to be greedy. Hegel's existence is reasonable, and it is reasonable to find out whose thing is in line with it, for example, we say that cockroaches are pests, but cockroaches are not like that from the point of view of insects. This is the core of this sentence, that is, whose reason is in harmony.

Like this question, maybe they're like cockroaches If you just want to be an insect then OK You can name a thousand reasons, China is not fully developed. But if you look at it from the perspective of people's happiness, they are not reasonable.

I think that being is rational is the idea of subjective idealism. First of all, we need to know that existence and non-existence are not transferred by our consciousness, and rationality is not transferred by our consciousness. Different subjective consciousness has different reflections, and only after the test of practice can we judge whether it is reasonable or not, if it is reasonable, it becomes a favorable factor for the development of things, and vice versa.

The opposite thing is also a relative concept, as for the reasonable or unreasonable, we can only see the result after the test, if it is favorable, then it is reasonable.

In fact, it is also reasonable, everything must be born and destroyed, and the same is true of the earth.

Do you know why people get cancer? Cancer cells greedily ingest their own nutrients to reproduce, and cannot be controlled by normal physiological functions, so people die.

Human beings live on the earth, like cancer cells, greedy, persistent, aggressive, and prone to war.

Isn't it that he is slowly destroying the only environment he depends on for survival, and he can't be conscious.

In fact, it is just following the principle of life and death.

Right or wrong, good or bad. As long as it exists, it is true. It is fundamentally speaking.

For example, at the beginning of man, nature is good.

It is not the existence of the day after tomorrow to determine whether it is reasonable or not.

I think it's about the natural world, just like the biology teacher said that a creature can live in the present, which means that its current structure is highly adapted to the environment, and it can't be changed to another structure.

Being is reasonable, Hegel said. According to Hegel, the origin of the universe is the Absolute Spirit. It has everything in itself, then externalizes the natural world, human society, spiritual science, and finally returns to itself on a higher level.

Therefore, whatever is on this trajectory of development is rational, that is, it is inevitable and realistic. The reverse is also true.

Being is rational is the theory of objective idealism, which means that the original principle of the universe is the absolute spirit (reason), which has everything in itself, and then externalizes the natural world, human society, spiritual science, and finally returns to itself at a higher level. Therefore, whatever is on this trajectory is reasonable (shorthand for "rational"), that is, it is inevitable and realistic.

From the preface to Hegel's Principles of the Philosophy of Law.

Everything that happens in the world today is reasonable, and it can only be done this way and not like that.

There is nothing wrong with this sentence in physics. No matter how irrational the substance is, as long as it exists in this universe, then we can only find the reason for its existence.