The more poor people are, the more they like to work on what things?

The more "poor" people are, the more they like to waste time, and they always procrastinate involuntarily. Eager to use the circle of friends to expand their careers, or only promise, dare not work forward.

First of all, what is the real "poor", in my opinion, economic poverty is not poverty in the real sense, only the poverty in thinking can be regarded as poverty. Their way of thinking is always different from others, and the way to find another way seems to be surprisingly successful, but in fact it is full of holes. "Poor people" like to waste time, and before doing something, they always set goals very ambitious and look magnificent, but after putting them into practice, they feel that they have more than enough to do.

I have many friends around me, who are strong in theory and short in action, who always speak beautifully, but never finish it. And it was none other than the deep-seated procrastination that defeated them.

Getting rid of procrastination, I think it's a very simple question. Only by gritting your teeth and stomping your feet can you easily overcome it. But they are exponentially trying to put in the time of procrastinating change.

But the result is not satisfactory, but the more it changes, the more "poor" it becomes. Because in this process, they have always been working hard, but only in words and actions, they have never practiced, and they have always been in the same state. If you spend a lot of time to get rid of procrastination, it will be effective and acceptable in the end.

But in the end, it's all empty, and it's still stuck in place, which is a bit useless. If you invest that time in something else, you might already be paying off.

The poor "do not know how to change, but go one way to the dark." Mental poverty, others can't help, only by standing up your chest, can you climb the peak. For themselves, they want to change their procrastination, but they are slow to act.

On the outside, the "poor" like to socialize, and these things are useless. At the critical moment, these friends have long disappeared, maybe they are just friends of wine and meat. If you move forward with such friends, how can you progress?

But the poor are different, they like to use this way to open the door to success, but in the end it is a dream, and it does not solve the substantive problem. It can be seen that the "poor" want to realize their dreams by contacting more people, which obviously does not exist, because when encountering difficulties, the only one who can rely on them is themselves. Let's say they retreat, then who would dare to help them?

The poor "also waste their energy on hesitation, they are indecisive and never dare to move forward." Rather, it's a bit arbitrary to use theory to analyze the direction of things. Because things are changing, only after hard work can you let yourself see the dawn of victory.

But excessive hesitation must lack some meaning, which cannot be solved, so the "poor" should be decisive, not submissive.

The more the real poor like to work things to save money, the more they don't try to earn money, but want to save money.

The poorer people are, the more they will work hard in their studies and careers, and they want to change their situation through hard work.

The more they like to work what they are not good at, because they understand their own shortcomings and will make them improve.

The poorer people are, the more they spend their time in the shadow of self-defeat, the easier it is to complain instead of finding out the cause of the matter and then correcting it.

Generally, such people will find all kinds of reasons and reasons to explain the result of their failure.