Does GDP have to be done by the capitalists?

The contribution to GDP is mainly done by the material production and service sectors. However, no matter which sector it is, its production (service) elements are composed of the following aspects: 1. Capital; 2. Labor; 3. Land (including all resources contained and built on the ground and underground); 4. Science and technology; 5. Entrepreneurial talent.

That is, capital is one of the essential elements in generating GDP, not the whole thing. But there is no doubt that with capital, several other elements can be bought, that is, controlled, and the following question is the substance: since capital has such magic, it depends on whose hands the capital is.

Under the conditions of a free market economy, capital is basically controlled by private individuals or private consortia, so the capitalists and the capitalist class are formed, who are profit-oriented, and therefore, they will reduce the cost as much as possible to obtain the maximum profit. Among them, the most direct and effective is to reduce the labor force, that is, to reduce wages, which is the origin of "exploitation".

Under the socialist market economic system, in theory, capital is owned by the whole society, and all members of society should enjoy the benefits brought by capital. However, social capital must be managed by specific people, and if that manager is a person of noble character, then it can bring benefits to the people; If that manager is a low-character, self-motivated man, then in this case it is even worse than the treatment of the laborer under the private capitalist economy.

GDP (GDP) refers to the value of all final goods and services produced in the economy of a country or region in a certain period of time (a quarter or a year), and is often recognized as the best indicator of a country's economic situation. It can reflect not only a country's economic performance, but also a country's national strength and wealth.

From the definition, it can be seen that GDP has nothing to do with capitalists. In addition, in today's economic society, capitalist is not necessarily a derogatory term! Hehe.

There are three ways to calculate GDP: production method: GDP Total output of each industrial sector Intermediate consumption of each industrial sector:

Income Method: GDP Remuneration of Workers by Industrial Sector Depreciation of Fixed Assets by Industrial Sector Net Production Tax by Industrial Sector Operating Profit by Industrial Sector; Expenditure Method: GDP, Total Consumption, Total Investment, Net Exports.

GDP is the sum of the added value of the whole society, and under the planned economy, there is also added value, so GDP does not have to be completed by capitalists

GDP can be achieved by three carriages, investment, consumption and exports.

However, in recent years, China's economic growth has been mainly driven by capital and exports, and if consumption alone drives GDP, it is likely to sit on the sidelines. The ending is like Greece.

For many years, the economic theory used in China has been Capital, which overemphasizes and criticizes exploitation. Now it seems that the added value of the currency is officially part of GDP.

If the per capita GDP is high, the industrial competitiveness will be strong? China should still be reasonable, the industrial competitiveness is very strong, but it happens to be a "counterexample". Looking at many countries with a much higher per capita GDP than China, I have long found that it is not worth mentioning from an industrial point of view.

What is the significance of these countries' high GDP per capita? This is to say that the country is competitive.

No, it's hard to get to the bottom of the question, without good productivity, GDP won't grow. Individual productivity is a seed, a seed grows into a capitalist, and some seeds will always be seeds if they do not have the opportunity to grow. GDP is grown by the joint efforts of capitalists and the underlying productive forces, and a sound system is the key to growth. Thank you.

Does GDP include fiscal spending?

It is known that in 2010, China's GDP was 401202 billion RMB, and in 2010, the total financial expenditure at all levels was about 9 trillion RMB, and as long as there is a transaction behavior, it will increase GDP accordingly, and how much GDP will be increased by transactions. Great**Ahh

GDP=c+i+g+(x-m) where g is the contribution value of ** part of the dust cracked state. 9,000 billion was spent, if it was just a simple capital change.

It is not counted in GDP. The emphasis on g here is the contribution value of g. It's how much G produces.

Got it? It doesn't necessarily have to do with how much he spends. If 9,000 billion does not produce a dime.

Naturally, they are not included in GDP.

There are three ways to calculate GDP.

1。Final value output calculation.

Since the emphasis in economics is on the assumption that aggregate supply equals aggregate demand. The market is constantly clearing. Hence the emergence of 2 other algorithms.

2。Income method.

3。Expenditure method.

In addition, it is not included in the transaction behavior, and the emphasis is on new output. Total output. It is not counted if there is a transaction. The change of capital has no new output. For example, buying and selling 2-hand houses. Not counted in GDP. There is a change of capital in the transaction.