What is the case of two people arguing together and one of them dies without the presence of a third

If the deceased party died a natural death, and there were no physical injuries, and there is no other evidence that directly or indirectly indicates that one party caused the death of the other party, it may be easier to deal with it, but civil compensation needs to be negotiated.

Hello, you said that two people quarrel together and one of them dies, and there is no third party present, this matter can only wait until the other party's small business is handled.

There was no third person present, just two people arguing together, one of them died, an accident.

This is a criminal offense, and the specific circumstances need to be investigated by the public security department based on the forensic examination and the actual evidence at the scene of death.

In cases like this, your report goes through the coroner. Let's take a look at the statement of ** after the autopsy. It is possible to die of a cerebral hemorrhage in a hurry. It has nothing to do with you.

Criminal cases may be handled intentionally or negligently.

110,000, or the wrong hand to hurt someone and cause death, this case is a bit complicated, because only the two of you know, if you don't have any entanglements, just just speculate, it may be push-and-push, or it may cause accidents, because it's hard to say.

Take the initiative to call the police and let the public security investigate clearly.

Personally, I think it should be handled as a criminal case or an administrative case, because two people, one of whom died, and this involves some criminal law incidents.

Hello landlord, this needs to be judged by the police, human life is at stake, it may be intentional homicide, or it may be manslaughter.

Want to see the cause of death? Intentional homicide? Manslaughter?

Summary. If the deceased has a high probability of suffering from heart disease or major illness, when the quarrel has a certain degree of causal relationship with the death caused by the disease, the parties need to bear the corresponding civil liability. If the other party clearly knows that the other party is suffering from a serious illness or in addition to insulting the victim, there is also a physical push and shove that causes the death of the other party, and the crime of negligence causing death is suspected, and the corresponding criminal responsibility must be borne.

After the two quarreled, one of the parties died who was responsible.

If the deceased has a high probability of suffering from heart disease or major illness, when the quarrel has a certain degree of causal relationship with the death caused by the disease, the parties need to bear the corresponding civil liability. If you clearly know that the other party is suffering from a serious illness or in addition to insulting the victim, there is also a physical push and shove that causes the death of the other party, and it is suspected of the crime of negligence causing death, and you must bear the corresponding and criminal responsibility for the death of the other party.

Kissing and kissing In the event of death due to a quarrel in normal life, if the suspect subjectively has neither the intent to kill or harm others, nor has objectively prepared and failed to commit the act of killing or harming others, the deceased may be honored and will not be held responsible. If both parties are subjectively at fault, the responsibility of the perpetrator will be different depending on the environment in which the quarrel or quarrel is made, and the intensity of the language.

Summary. Dear, hello, it is a pleasure to serve you After the quarrel between the two, who is responsible for the death of one party, the law does not clearly stipulate, and it needs to be analyzed in combination with the actual situation. To determine whether a person is liable for the death of others, it is first necessary to determine whether there is a tort in the death of others.

What is a tort? Generally speaking, the circumstances of civil tort liability are: first, the actor must have subjective malice and illegal acts; Secondly, there must be a harmful result, and there must be a causal relationship between the wrongful act mentioned above and the harmful result.

After the two quarreled, one of the parties died who was responsible.

Dear, hello, it is a pleasure to serve you After the quarrel between the two, who is responsible for the death of one party, the law does not clearly stipulate, and it needs to be combined with the actual situation leakage analysis. To determine whether a person is responsible for the death of another person, it is first necessary to determine whether there is a tort of infringement for the death of another person. What is a tort?

Generally speaking, the circumstances of civil tort liability are: first, the actor must have subjective malice and illegal acts; Secondly, there must be a harmful result in the imitation file, and there must be a causal relationship between the aforementioned illegal act and the harmful result.

The imputation of the law is very clear and direct, and we must avoid involving the emotions of blind people or the psychological activities of those who destroy the situation, otherwise, all the ultimate imputation will be infinitely extended, so that it is equivalent to imputing responsibility every day. This is the law, this is the limit of the law, it can only regulate people's behavior itself, not people's mental activities. If your actions are self-inflicted, you have to bear the consequences.

The residual causality of the law is a direct causal relationship, and the behavior caused by one's own emotions is one's own choice.