Factors restricting the healthy development of the bureaucratic system in ancient China

The truth is not what you say, friend.

In fact, since the Shang and Zhou dynasties, the Qin and Han dynasties, and the Ming Dynasty (including the Mongol and Yuan dynasties), the bureaucratic system in ancient China has always developed very normally, and each dynasty has reformed the bureaucratic system in response to the previous dynasty's administration. As a result, the illusion that my friends said was not a matter of bureaucracy, but the personal reasons of the emperor (or ruler).

By the time the Ming Dynasty had developed, the Chinese bureaucracy was actually quite perfect, at least at that time it was very advanced in the world. The bureaucratic system of the Ming Dynasty was able to ensure that the political system of the entire country could run smoothly when the emperor was incompetent. This was despite the capture of Ming Yingzong, and the Ming Dynasty was still able to persist in winning the victory over Warat.

It's a good proof of that. Similarly, when Emperor Jiajing did not go to court for decades, the country was still relatively stable and prosperous.

The shortcomings of the Ming Dynasty are that the spy agencies and the selection system of the ** are too prominent (the implementation of the eight shares of the people), so that the late Ming Dynasty ** can not obtain suitable countermeasures to the deteriorating surrounding environment (the rise of the Later Jin).

Only in the Qing Dynasty, the Manchu Tartars knew that they had done too many evils when they entered the customs, and they killed the Han people to the extreme, so in the end of the Manchu Qing Dynasty, the Tatars were always afraid of the revenge of the Han people, so the entire generation of the Manchu Dynasty, the Tatars did not believe in the Han people at all, and the Tartars were barbaric and ignorant by nature, which made a big regression in Chinese history.

The feudal gate lords were powerful and controlled or restricted the perfection and development of the state bureaucracy.

In order to ensure the selection of talents, in China's long feudal society, the state vigorously develops education on the one hand; On the other hand, we should continue to explore and improve the system of electing officials, the most important of which is the establishment and improvement of the imperial examination system. "ZTE is talent-oriented", since ancient times, there is a saying that "those who win people prosper" and "those who lose virtue die". Therefore, conscientiously summing up the successful experiences and failures of ancient China in selecting and appointing officials is still of very important practical significance.

System: 1. Probationary system.

2 Levy and open up are treated as courtesy.

3. Elimination is a system for appointing subordinate officials at the top of the level.

4. Nine products are made in the right system.

5. The imperial examination system.

Qin: Centralization. The Sui Dynasty established the three-province six-ministry system, and the Tang Dynasty perfected the three-province six-ministry system. Song no, Yuan: Establish a provincial-level administrative region.

Qin ** three dukes and nine qing, local county system.

The Sui Dynasty was the first to open the imperial examination, and the Tang Dynasty had a six-ministry system in three provinces to improve the imperial examination.

Yuan provincial system.

The Qin Dynasty established the county system.

The six-ministry system of the three provinces of the Sui and Tang dynasties.

Two governments and three divisions of the Song Dynasty.

The Yuan Dynasty had one province and two courts.