Is the world a chicken or an egg 5

First came the chicken, or came first the egg? This is a mystery that mankind has wanted to solve for a long time. A scientist, a philosopher, and the president of a poultry farming association recently gave the same answer to the question of the first egg.

CNN reports, did the chicken come first or the egg came first? Scientists and philosophers seem to have a relatively unanimous answer to this question: the egg comes first.

The simple reason is that the genetic material does not change during the life of the animal. Modern biomolecular theories believe that it is the genetic mutation of the genetic material in the egg that makes it possible for the chicken species to appear. So probably prehistory, when the first bird evolved into what we call chickens, it must have existed in the embryo inside the egg.

John Brookfield, professor of evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, said: "The order is very clear. The first chicken is an embryo contained in the egg, and the genes of that embryo are the same as those of the chicken that was born; That is, the first member of the species belonging to the chicken must be an egg containing the genetic material of the chicken.

David Papineau, a philosopher at King's College London, UK, proved Brookfield's point of view from a philosophical point of view. He said, "Plant melons and get melons, and sow beans and get beans."

It is said that the egg was laid by a kangaroo, but it turned out that the egg hatched an ostrich, then the egg must have been laid by an ostrich, not a kangaroo. By the same token, the first chicken could not have hatched from an egg laid by another species of animal. The first chick should come from an egg.

This egg is the product of a mutation of another species of bird. This egg is essentially an egg anyway, because what comes from it is a real chicken. ”

Billyben finally understood, in fact, one sentence: in the process of evolution, the embryo mutates.

Did the chicken come first or the egg came first? It's a difficult question for us. But on the issue of first-come-first-served or first-served, we can make a decision.

The human world evolved from a single cell first! From a scientific point of view, it can be said that there are eggs first!

Human society has only chickens and ducks and no eggs!

Simple question!

First there are eggs, then there are chickens!

The reason, modern biological research shows that the birth of any new organism is due to genetic mutation, so I personally think that it can be understood as a kind of organism due to mutation to produce mutated eggs, and eggs give birth to chickens, hehe!

Whether it is determined that there is a chicken or an egg first, whether the chicken or the egg is the origin of the chicken species, it is just a conceptual assumption in philosophy, and it is not a reflection of the real essential attributes of the chicken and the egg in the chicken species, because who comes first and who comes after is just the chicken and the egg due to the law of their inherent DNA life genes, showing a difference in order in time, not that there is an essential difference between the chicken and the egg in the chicken species, of course there will be no egg without chicken, and where is the chicken without egg? Obviously, in the life species of chickens and eggs, which are mutually causal cycles, chickens and eggs are not the whole of the essence of the chicken species, but only a part of the essence of the chicken species, due to the determination of its DNA genetic mechanism, the external manifestation is in the order of time, it is impossible to determine the origin and derivation of the origin and derivation due to the determination of the chronological order of who comes first and who is later, and it is not surprising that the predecessors without DNA knowledge have debated this philosophically for thousands of years without a conclusion; In addition to philosophical problems, there are also problems of scientific understanding.

The egg or the chicken came first in the world? In order to find the truth, the chicken people actually traveled to 10 billion years ago!

Let's have two together. Hehe.

This question has been around for a long time, but there is no one absolutely right answer, and there can be no one.

This is not a matter of science, but of logic.

Let's assume that the chicken here refers specifically to the domestic chicken, and the egg refers specifically to the egg. Otherwise, if the dinosaur egg is also counted in the scope of "eggs", the answer must be that there are eggs first, and there will be no debate for so long.

The answer can be either the chicken or the egg. It depends on the identification of the first "chicken" and the first "egg".

According to the more popular view now, birds (including chickens, of course) evolved from a branch of the dinosaurs. And the evolution of species is an extremely long and gradual process. Even from the end of the Cretaceous period, when the dinosaurs became extinct, it is more than 65 million years ago, and the evolutionary process from dinosaurs to birds must have begun even earlier.

In such a long evolutionary process, it has gone through millions of generations and countless small evolutions to come to the "chicken" we see today and discuss here.

Suppose the first dinosaur that started this evolutionary process was N1, and it laid an egg N1, N1 hatched the second generation of N2 in the evolutionary process, and N2 gave birth to the egg N2, followed by N3, N3, N4, N4, N5, N5, 、......ni、ni、ni+1、ni+1……Until today's N1000000 and N1000000, in this process, the characteristics of dinosaurs continue to decrease and the characteristics of chickens continue to increase, so the generation of animals Ni is defined as the first "chicken", and which egg Ni is defined as the first "egg", which is the crux of the problem. Suppose N800000 is defined as the first "chicken" and its egg N800000 is defined as the first "egg", and the conclusion is that there is a chicken and then an egg, and if N799999 is defined as the first "egg" and its hatched N800000 is defined as the first "chicken", the conclusion becomes the first egg. The process is so long, the evolution is so slow, the changes in each generation are so small, there is absolutely no clear demarcation, before there was no doubt about the dinosaur, and one generation has changed into the undoubted chicken.

In this process, you can define N8000000 as the first chicken, N7000000 as the first chicken, and the same is true for the definition of eggs.

So don't seek a clear and absolutely correct answer to the question of chicken or egg: it can be the chicken or the egg, depending on your identification of the first "chicken" and the first "egg".

Did the "bird eggs" evolve into chickens, and then the chickens lay eggs?

Or did the birds give birth to the "eggs" that evolved, and then the eggs gave rise to the chickens?

1:21 And God made great fish, and every living creature that came out of the waters, according to their kinds; And he made every kind of bird, every according to his kind. God looks good.

From the Buddhist Sutra of Lengyan, we can know that there are chickens and eggs at the same time

From a scientific point of view, we start with the first life on Earth, and the first life on Earth should be infinitely close to the way bacteria or viruses reproduce.

Chickens can be transformed from other species, but eggs must be laid by chickens, so chickens come first and then eggs.

The egg or the chicken came first in the world? In order to find the truth, the chicken clan actually traveled to 100 worlds, where there were eggs or chickens first? In order to find the truth, the chicken clan actually crossed over to 100

My answer is that there is a chicken first, then an egg.

o( o haha

As for why, you can ask me the reason individually.

The emergence and change of all things and phenomena in the universe have their corresponding mutual existence relationship. Buddhism talks about dependent origination, and often uses "this is the other, and this life is the other; If there is nothing, there is nothing, and if this is destroyed, then it will be destroyed" to illustrate the principle of dependent origination.

From this point of view, everything in the universe has no beginning. Since there is no beginning, the question of "chicken or egg" cannot be established. Human beings' ** about the origin of the world is linear, so they will endlessly investigate which one started and which one was first.

Buddhism, on the other hand, believes that the world is dependent and round. In a circle, is there a beginning and an end?

First there are eggs, then there are chickens!

How can there be chickens without eggs?

Birds came a long time ago because of genetic mutations, as for the mutation of chickens is chickens first, mutated eggs are eggs, according to the normal egg first.

From a scientific point of view, we start with the first life on Earth, and the first life on Earth should be infinitely close to the way bacteria or viruses reproduce.

A controversial but inconclusive question is now scientifically confirmed: "The chicken comes before the egg".

Researchers at the University of Sheffield and the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom have teamed up to scientifically scrutinize the age-old chicken-and-egg debate.

In the end, the scientists concluded that there must be chickens before there are eggs, because the formation of eggs requires a special protein that is only present in the ovaries of hens.

Colin Freeman of the University of Sheffield said: "We have always suspected that there were eggs before chickens, but now we have scientific evidence to conclude that in fact there are chickens and eggs. ”

Egg formation. Egg formation requires a protein that has long been known to the scientific community, but after careful study, we can clearly observe how this protein controls the formation of eggs. ”

This protein, known as "OC-17", acts as a catalyst and accelerates the development and formation of eggshells.

Using a supercomputer to amplify the structure of an egg, scientists found that OC-17 initiated the crystallization of the eggshell in its initial form.

This protein converts calcium carbonate into "calcite crystals", which are the building blocks of eggshells.

John Harding, professor in the Department of Engineering Materials at the University of Sheffield, said: "Studying and understanding the process of laying eggs is an interesting subject in itself, but more importantly we can apply it to designing new materials. ”

First came the chicken, or came first the egg? Aristotle, a scholarly authority active in 3000 B.C., said: "There is an egg without a father and a mother, and the first chicken pops out of the egg".

Did the chicken come first or the egg came first? It's a difficult question for us. But on the issue of first-come-first-served or first-served, we can make a decision.

The egg or the chicken came first in the world? In order to find the truth, the chicken people actually traveled to 10 billion years ago!

First came the chicken, or came first the egg?

Upstairs hilarious, typical pseudoscience.