If a thief enters the house and steals something and I hurt me, can this be considered an act of sel

The thief entered the house and was injured by stealing something, which should be regarded as an act of self-defense, because the thief stole first, and the act of fighting back is also reasonable.

It should be an act of self-defense, because it was he who went first to steal something, and if he didn't steal, he wouldn't have beaten him, this is an act of self-defense, and hitting him should also be, and if you don't hit him, he will steal from you.

Yes, because it was the thief who was at fault in the first place, and you injured him while protecting your property and personal safety, it is an act of self-defense and does not constitute a crime.

It should be considered a reasonable act of self-defense for you to do so, because after all, it is a thief who enters the house and steals something, causing you a certain amount of fright, and you are also to blame for being injured, and you can use legal means to protect your rights and interests.

If the thief doesn't attack you, you shouldn't be acting in self-defense, but if the thief is attacking you, it's definitely self-defense, and the nature of the thief's burglary has changed.

If the thief is stealing and hitting the thief is excessive defense, but if the thief hits him after stealing something, it is the crime of intentional injury.

No, there are some crimes of intentional harm to others, after all, he steals things, does not cause harm to you, and at the same time does not threaten your personal safety.

It can be regarded as self-defense, because when a thief steals something, he will definitely act more excitedly, and it is also to protect himself, so he will mark it.

Of course, this is the right thing to do, and in order to protect yourself from property damage in time, you should not be afraid, the law will not punish you.

Of course it can be counted, because it is the thief who enters your home first, and everything you do can be counted as self-defense.

Yes, because such an act of a thief is illegal in the first place, and he should defend himself after being hurt.

Count, it's because you accidentally injured the other person when you were fighting with them, but you didn't put their lives in danger.

I was doing this as a sign of self-defense, and this self-defense was good, and I reacted well to protect my property.

Of course, forget it, because after all, it is a thief who enters your house to steal something, so it is completely self-defense to say that you injured him.

Forget it, after all, if a thief enters your home, you should take certain measures to protect your own safety.

Forget it, of course. Your actions are justified and you do not need to bear any legal responsibility at all.

Counted. So you don't have to worry about being held accountable. Because your actions are justified in self-defense.

I think it's okay because he's already a burglary, and it's a bad behavior, and he should be stopped.

Of course, forget it, and this kind of behavior is also legitimate defense, otherwise his fate may be worse than his.

It is considered an act of self-defense. Because you are doing this to protect your property, and also to protect yourself.

It should be counted, because in this process, the other party has already posed a certain threat to himself, so it should be compliant.

This is considered legitimate defense, and he will not bear the corresponding responsibility, and he will also be given a certain reward.

Summary. According to Article 20 of the Criminal Law, an act taken to stop an unlawful infringement in order to protect the State, the public interest, the person, property and other rights of oneself or others from an ongoing unlawful infringement causes damage to the wrongdoer, is justified defense and does not bear criminal responsibility. Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived.

Hello, I am a partner lawyer of the platform and have received your question.

Hello, how much responsibility should a thief bear for stealing something and being injured.

Hello, it's like this, first of all, thieves stealing things, that is, theft, that is, committing illegal acts. The victim beats the thief in order to protect his lawful rights and interests, which may be regarded as legitimate defense.

But what. If it clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived.

The thief is now hospitalized and asks for money.

According to Article 20 of the Criminal Law, an act taken to stop an unlawful infringement in order to protect the State, the public interest, the person, property and other rights of oneself or others from an ongoing unlawful infringement causes damage to the wrongdoer, is justified defense and does not bear criminal responsibility. Where legitimate defense clearly exceeds the necessary limit and causes major harm, criminal responsibility shall be borne, but punishment shall be commuted or waived.

He was wrong to steal in the first place!

Is he seriously injured?

Problem: Now the thief is hospitalized, saying that he has internal injuries and wants 50,000.

Otherwise, the matter will not be over.

Not very serious, internal injuries ?! Is there any evidence? What did the hospital say.

It's not very heavy, and you dare to ask for 50,000, where did you beat him.

Vital parts.

For example, the head.

Hit him with a stick.

Wooden or iron?

If this is the case, it is recommended that you call the police and let the police deal with it.

Because there is no way to prove the internal injury he claimed, even if the hospital gave an examination report, he still said that he was very troubled if he suffered internal injuries.

And he's a thief, if you don't call the police, what are you doing with it?

Therefore, it is recommended that you call the police. One is to prevent the thief from continuing to entangle in the future, and the other is to solve the matter smoothly so that it will not continue to bother you.

Legal Analysis: If you beat a thief, you need to be responsible. Where a party discovers a suspect in theft, he shall be brought to justice through lawful channels, and may be transferred to the local public security organ; However, where a party beats a suspect in theft without permission, reaching the level of minor injury or more, it constitutes the crime of intentional injury.

Legal basis: Article 234 of the Criminal Law Whoever intentionally injures the body of another person shall be sentenced to up to three years imprisonment, short-term detention or controlled release. Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph, causing serious injury, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than ten years; Whoever causes death or seriously injures a person by especially cruel means, causing serious disability, is to be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than 10 years, life imprisonment, or death.

Where this Law provides otherwise, follow those provisions.