Hello, now I have encountered a safety incident, please help analyze it, thank you

First of all, have you operated according to the specification, and if you have operated according to the specification, then why does the wire rope break? Is there no maintenance and maintenance? If it is because the wire rope is very old, there have been workers who have proposed to the leader to change but the leader has ignored it, in this case, the leader also has to bear a certain responsibility, and the worker needs to bear only a responsibility for the maintenance is not in place.

In fact, this is a safety accident, which is caused by insufficient maintenance and overhaul of the equipment. The leader means that it can't be said that it is a safety accident, because the leader is not easy to explain when there is an accident, so he means that you will admit that you are operating incorrectly.

However, if you take responsibility for improper operation, then the equipment will naturally be paid by you. It would be inappropriate for the leader to do so.

You should talk to the leader and say that you can take responsibility, but you must ensure that the equipment is not compensated by me, and it cannot have any impact on me in the future. I believe that the leader will promise you. But in the end, whether to deal with it in this way depends on the character of the leader.

Therefore, this conversation with the leader should clearly describe the facts of the whole matter, clearly divide the responsibilities, and make the final handling clear. It's best to find something to secretly record yourself, and if something happens to you in the future, take it out as evidence.

Admit it, brother. Everyone will encounter unfortunate things in their lives, and the time has come to test you! Don't try to evade responsibility, this is a sign of lack of responsibility.

If you really can't, I recommend that you consult a lawyer to see how it goes.

You have to take all the responsibility.

You have to take all the blame then you should think. It is not related to the wire rope this product. Because if you standardize the operation.

In the case that there is no problem with the product. I'm sure it won't happen. Meantime.

You can consult the law to seek some legal protection. If it's your responsibility. Can be resisted.

If not. Why should we resist responsibility for others?

Then you should think about it. It is not related to the wire rope this product. Because if you standardize the operation.

In the case that there is no problem with the product. I'm sure it won't happen. Meantime.

You can consult the law to seek some legal protection. If it's your responsibility. Can be resisted.

If not. Why should we resist responsibility for others?

Hello traffic police brigade copy accident responsibility determination of the production is not necessarily made by the traffic police who deal with the accident, but there is a special department responsible for the production, however, the actual situation of the accident scene and the real state of both sides, it is necessary for the traffic police concerned to investigate and verify, according to you, the traffic police brigade "before and after two weeks has not been determined. "It is very likely that the traffic police are conducting an accident investigation, so it will be a bit long. The traffic police brigade shall, within 10 days from the date of on-site investigation, make a road traffic accident identification document.

Therefore, you don't have to be in a hurry, you just need to wait for the notice of the traffic police brigade and cooperate with the traffic police in the accident investigation.

According to your description, the other party is driving a motorcycle with a fake license plate and has not passed the annual examination speeding through the intersection, and after seeing the chronic avoidance sign, still did not slow down, therefore, the motorcycle driver should bear the primary responsibility for this accident, and you, as a motor vehicle driver, failed to fulfill the obligation of prudent driving at the rural intersection, and bear secondary responsibility for this accident.

Therefore, you don't have to worry, how the next work should be carried out, you are not the main responsible person for this accident, therefore, there is no need to worry too much, commercial insurance is almost not used, compulsory traffic insurance is enough to use. You don't have to worry. The problem is not very big.

First BAI: Accidents.

It was determined that the traffic police should appear in the DU field, according to the brake marks of the vehicle, and the surrounding eyes

The hitter or the camera will determine the guilt, and open the "Traffic Accident Identification Certificate" to divide the responsibility! Second: when passing through this kind of intersection, you should slow down and observe after walking, according to your dictation, the motorcycle is the main responsibility, you are secondarily responsible!

The third is the ** fee, which is negotiated and paid by both parties to the accident in the early stage, and you can find the insurance company to pay in advance if it exceeds 10,000! Fourth, you are a small car, high insurance, I estimate that the traffic police will ask you to negotiate first, let you take the main responsibility, after all, the motorcycle insurance is low, if you encounter family problems, drag trouble!

Because it involves personal injury, both sides of the car damage, the insurance company is required to the accident identification, the car can be repaired can be opened first, arrange a ** person to receive the accident identification, the other party because there is no compulsory insurance, your car damage within 2000 to the other party, the accident is not big, it is better to issue a you are fully responsible.

Judging from your description, he chased after you, and the loss of the front of the car must have been very serious. Moreover, the rear structure of your vehicle's manger is simple, and even the repair cost will not be too high.

Generally, big cars are insured, and it depends on whose insurance is appropriate.

If you use your insurance, provided that you bear full responsibility for the accident, it is clear that it is impossible to be held liable as the vehicle in front in a rear-end collision. The insurance company's traffic police did not admit it.

The best way is to take his insurance compensation, if he is on the full insurance, before the traffic police issue a letter of responsibility, you two better coordinate, or give a red envelope lubrication. Let the other party bear all the responsibility, so that the insurance company can pay the full amount when paying him, if it is divided into the main responsibility, a part of the compensation cost will not be paid, which will inevitably cause disputes between the two parties.

Hope it helps.

It is difficult to draw conclusions about this accident. Since the other party has no brake marks, it is not good to judge the speed of the vehicle according to the brakes, you had better do an accident vehicle driving speed and collision point identification.

According to your description, the traffic police will generally determine that the other party is primarily responsible, and you are responsible for secondary responsibility: such as maintaining a safe speed, no traffic light rules to give way, etc.

As the driver of the vehicle, the object of the claim is the construction party; As a passenger, the target of the claim is the driver and the construction party.

Agree with the opinion of the upstairs and prosecute according to the "tort law".

Non-road traffic accidents are handled by the local police station.

Municipal maintenance office of Shaanxi County**.

1.Enterprise A and Individual B are in a lease contract relationship, and they do not assume any liability unless the leased property is defective and leads to the infringement result.

2.If it is an employment relationship, then B must be liable, and if it is an employment relationship, if B is not at fault in this case, he does not need to pay compensation.

3.The insurance for trucks depends on the insurance agreement. This case should not be involved, and the insurance should only occur when the owner C compensates for the infringement, and there is no such thing as C in this case.

4.Even if there is a violation of safety regulations, it is difficult to say whether there is a causal relationship with the death of the driver who overturned the vehicle, and even if the violation may be solved by administrative punishment, it has nothing to do with the compensation of the driver Ding.

5.If it is really the fault of both parties A and B that caused the accident, the safety management agreement between A and B cannot be used against a third party under the premise that A and B are liable, in other words, if D sues A and B, he can be the defendant. However, the share and proportion of compensation will depend on a case-by-case basis.

Please bring the documents to consult in person.

Zongheng Legal Network-Fujian Mingshi Law Firm-Lawyer Zhou Xingfang.