-
Consciousness and matter could not have existed first. If there is matter first, then whose consciousness is the substance that makes it exist? If there is consciousness first, then how does consciousness allow matter to exist?
We can't understand one-sidedly that there is the first one and then the one that comes after. The phenomenon of the development and change of matter may be what we call consciousness, such as a tree that sprouts in spring and leaves in autumn. Do you say it's conscious?
For it, it follows the laws of the world. You can say that it is conscious, otherwise it cannot survive. Consciousness is a noun for us humans.
The laws that we humans follow are what we call consciousness. He is just more selective than animals and plants. No matter how selective it is, it is difficult to detach itself from the laws of the world.
If we are free from the bondage of matter one day, then the consciousness at that time is truly conscious.
-
It doesn't matter who exists first, I emphasize the naturalness.
In the matter of pre-existence, a waste, a witch and a god know what to do.
Useless for survival in reality.
And do not engage in party strife.
Isn't it good to live naturally, and to live a comfortable life with free and easy things?
Those who are engaged in psychological work, poetry creation, art and painting, planning and construction, and scientific and technological inventions and creations.
Even if he loves philosophy, he will never achieve anything if he engages in such a material pre-existence.
Consciousness first exists most of the mental disorders and depression, so there must be spiritual sustenance for those who believe in God and Buddhism.
-
Without consciousness, there is no concept of matter, no concept of existence, and no category of existence. First there is consciousness, then there is matter.
There is no evidence that matter is a necessary condition for the existence of consciousness. On the contrary, there is evidence that it is consciousness that defines matter.
-
I think, therefore I'm This should be materialist and idealistic, who exists first, who do you think will appear first, because this is a kind of cycle, "random code", which gives a good reference, in fact, these are useless, will he affect your life, except for ** **, don't choose between ** ** dialectic needs to be complex And it is this kind of classic problem.
-
Matter precedes existence.
Conscious existence depends on neurons, which are material.
-
The head of the upstairs, don't get excited.
-
Let me ask you a question, can matter exist independently without consciousness?
Can consciousness exist independently without matter?
-
1. Matter determines consciousness
Consciousness is the reflection of objective things in the human brain. Correct consciousness is a truthful reflection, and erroneous consciousness is a distorted reflection;
2. Consciousness has a reaction to matter:
Under the guidance of consciousness, people change the concrete form of another material by using one material thing to act on another material thing.
Marxist philosophy is dialectical materialism and historical materialism, and dialectical materialism is composed of three parts: dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and dialectical materialist epistemology.
Dialectical materialism holds that matter is an objective reality that does not depend on human consciousness and can be reflected by human consciousness. Whether it is the existence and development of the natural world or the existence and development of human society, they do not depend on human consciousness.
This objective reality, which does not depend on human consciousness, is materiality. The whole world is a material world that objectively exists without relying on human consciousness, and the original nature of the world is matter. Matter has a decisive effect on consciousness.
Matter determines consciousness, consciousness is a reflection of matter, consciousness is not self-generated and a priori, the form of knowing the world is subjective, and the content of knowing the world is objective.
Dialectical relationship. 1. Matter has a decisive role in consciousness. Matter determines consciousness, consciousness is a reflection of matter, if we do not admit that matter is opposed to consciousness, there is no objective practical coordinates, consciousness is a subjective reflection of the objective world.
2. Consciousness has an active effect on matter. The active role of consciousness is first manifested in the fact that consciousness can correctly reflect objective things, and it is also prominently manifested in the fact that consciousness can react on objective things.
Marxist philosophy is dialectical materialism and historical materialism, and dialectical materialism is composed of three parts: dialectical materialism, materialist dialectics, and dialectical materialist epistemology.
Dialectical materialism was founded by Marx on the basis of critically inheriting the excellent achievements of human culture, especially on the basis of critically absorbing the "rational kernel" of Hegel's dialectics and the "basic kernel" of Feuerbach's materialism.
-
Summary. Hello, I am glad to answer for you: which is the first nature of matter and consciousness, mainly to discuss the question of who is the source of the world between matter and consciousness, if we think that matter is the source of the world, and matter is the first nature, we uphold the materialist viewpoint.
If we think that consciousness is the source and consciousness is the first nature, we are holding an idealist view.
The only criterion for distinguishing between materialism and idealism is the primacy of matter and consciousness.
Which is the source, matter or consciousness.
Your question has been received, it will take a little time to touch the reed and type, please wait a while, please don't end the consultation, you can also provide more effective information before the noise, so that I can better answer the <> for you
Hello very high search family to answer for you: matter and consciousness which is the first nature, mainly to discuss matter and consciousness who is the source of the world such a question, if you think that matter is the origin of the world, matter is the first nature, we uphold the materialist point of view. If we believe that consciousness is the source and consciousness is the first nature, we uphold the idealistic view of Spike Oak.
The only criterion for distinguishing between materialism and idealism is the primacy of matter and consciousness.
If my answer is helpful to you, please give a thumbs up (comment in the lower left corner), look forward to your like, your efforts are very important to me, and your support is also the driving force for my progress. If you feel that my answer is still satisfied, you can nod my head and let the book be like a one-on-one consultation <>
Ask about custom messages].
-
1. Stone is a social existence, and we know that stone is social consciousness, if we do not have the social existence of stone in our life, there will be no social consciousness that I know stone.
2. When you are thirsty, you want to drink water, but you don't have a cup, so you have the consciousness of producing a cup, so you have a cup.
3. The contradiction between China's growing material and cultural needs and backward production at the present stage requires us to persist in taking economic construction as the center.
Therefore, generally speaking, for people, the process of knowing affairs is often that existence determines consciousness, and in the process of changing affairs, consciousness determines existence. For example, the computer has a sense of design first, and then there is a physical existence.
-
The relationship between consciousness and matter can be divided into materialism and idealism holding the view that "consciousness determines matter".
Western philosophy divides the cognitive perspective of the world into "materialism" and "idealism". To distinguish between the two is to identify the essence of the relationship between consciousness and matter. Positive or.
1.Materialism holds that the objective existence of matter is not subject to the will of man (note that it is the will). The generation of consciousness depends on the material carrier, and without matter there is no consciousness.
For example, if you don't have eyes, you can't "see", and you can't "smell" ...... without your noseThe comprehensive sense of how a person sees anything is not only affected by the organs, but also by the hormones in the body. And after the death of man, the earth is still rotating, and after the extinction of man, the universe still exists.
2.Idealism, on the other hand, holds that all phenomena are conscious in order to feel the existence of matter. Without consciousness, the existence of matter has no meaning and is equivalent to non-existence. And because of consciousness, matter can be combined into what the current world looks like.
Subjective idealists believe that the world is a product of consciousness, distributed by a higher level of consciousness and knowledge, so that all things are so ordered.
Objective idealists believe that consciousness can alter physical existence. In life, all work and creative actions are everywhere reflected in the material results of consciousness.
Matter is divided into solid, liquid and gaseous states, in addition to ultra-solid, neutron and plasma states. >>>More
Space-time is the form of existence of matter. >>>More
I poke, don't believe it, believe it, there may be such a "heaven", there may really be God, Jesus, "hell", it's just that our technology is not developed enough, but the landlord "The universe in the heaven world is at least very large or infinite light years, there is endless knowledge to explore, strange materials, although there is no war, food, drink, clothing and housing, disasters, no **, no competition, everyone is equal." But entertainment is still important, such as computer games, movies, **, animation, as long as it involves entertainment technology, heaven must be very developed. The energy and technology or magic that doesn't exist in our world are in this world. >>>More
Hello, generally speaking, things in the dark are often less able to be put on the table, so they are not good, and they may all belong to the bad things.
Fortune telling is a backward culture.
It's like a birthday, a lottery. >>>More