Find a few simple and easy to mistake questions, and give points to everything that is good

You passed second place in the running race, how many places were you?

2nd place Most say 1st place).

4100 Some would say 5000).

To be perfected...

What do you need to find something? (Compass).

What does a fat man become when he falls from the 12th floor? (Dead fat man) Uh, this one is a little cold What's the difference between jumping from the first floor and jumping from the tenth floor? (The sound of jumping down from the first floor is: Bang!) Ah, the voice of the tenth floor jumping down is: Ahh ）

Which is higher A or C? (C, because ABCD, A is lower than C).

1+1=several (equal to 2) can actually be equal to 2, Tian, Wang, etc

I've seen a new version of an old-fashioned question, and many people will answer it wrong without thinking, and I sincerely recommend it to you, hoping to choose me, but it doesn't matter if you don't choose o( o

Which weighs a kilogram of iron or a pound of cotton?

Well, guess for yourself (* hee-hee......

Also, I've seen the two upstairs too, and they're not bad o( o haha

Question: When is World Environment Day? Answer: June 5th.

The first method is better. It is beneficial for you to review your own notes before the exam.

Because the general easy-to-mistake questions refer to the questions where some conditions are easy to be overlooked. Pooling together is more conducive to identifying your weaknesses.

And in your junior year of high school, your hard notes will come into play. You may even find that some of the finale questions are familiar, so you can flip through your puzzle set.

In fact, as far as the exam is concerned, the easy-to-mistake question set can help you improve more.

I'm a junior in high school, and we also have a notebook, so I suggest you divide the notebook into several parts. Function. Solid geometry.

The mistakes collected in the book make classic mistakes, and some irrelevant questions just need to be corrected and done again.

Of course. Many well-known public figures are typical of this. For example, Mr. Kai-Fu Lee's theory that rumors force the truth. It's hard to believe that a person of a level of knowledge can say something that goes against common sense.

The most important thing in a debate is to define what the level of knowledge is. It is likely that the positive side will narrow this definition and use some quantitative indicators, such as the number of journals published, or even directly define the level of knowledge as a diploma, teaching experience, or something.

There's nothing to dwell on with a diploma or something. As long as you broaden the definition of knowledge level, for example, to include application skills, including innovation ability, and so on. In particular, the concept of knowledge level and ability is blurred. Then it is clear that "a diploma does not represent ability".

There are some questions that can be provided in the offensive and defensive phases.

For example, the definition of knowledge level? If the positive side goes quantitative, the negative side can entangle the support of the opponent's statistics.

For example, if you also have a bachelor's degree in finance and management, why do you only need graduates from "famous schools" for example? Does it mean that the same diploma does not mean the same level of knowledge?

For the summary of the four debates, what is also needed is to find a way out for "what does the diploma represent", since the diploma does not represent just the level, what is the use of the diploma.

Not necessarily, everything has two sides, take yesterday's Fudan University poisoning case as an example, isn't the poisoner's diploma not high? But does what he does reflect his level of knowledge? I think that if the level of knowledge is high, his ideological quality should be just as high.

Using Edison as an example, there are also Hua Luogeng and other examples around the world. It's so easy to give counterexamples! There is an existence, and their theory is untenable, in fact, is this question still worth discussing?

It's ridiculous, you know the result by yourself! It's just a matter of looking at your on-site reactions and whether the loopholes in the other party's language are accurate!