Why doesn t the United States have a central enterprise land king?

Fang Limei and Freddie Mac in the United States are now regarded as central enterprises, but they are very strict about financial allocation, and if the United States is not for high land prices, there will be no real estate bubble bursting and economic crisis.

There are no state-owned enterprises in the United States, but there are not necessarily no land kings, because people don't openly act as referees and players.

There are also central enterprises in the United States, and there are land kings in the United States. It's just that you don't know. New York's turf is much higher. State-owned enterprises (i.e., federally controlled companies) in the United States are few and low-key, but they are also surprisingly large.

There is only one state-owned enterprise in the United States, the post office (the Federal Reserve is privately owned), and the post office has no right to operate real estate, and it is not even a for-profit organization, so it cannot produce a central enterprise land king. The central enterprise land king is unique to China, but there are bubbles everywhere. In addition, I feel that we should manage the people's livelihood, rather than plundering the people's livelihood without restraint, and real estate can only create a bubble and cannot create a strong country.

Let's put it this way, the population of the United States is much smaller than that of China, but the territory is about the same, and if you look at American movies, most of them like to live far away from the city, and some even take the train to work, which we Chinese don't do. Therefore, the United States must have it, and it is much more expensive than China. If you think about it, you must think that the house is too expensive, and give you some advice, instead of yelling about the house being too expensive, think about how to make more money.

Don't be like those angry young people, blame you if you can't afford to buy a house.

Because the United States is not so black on its own people!

It's not that there isn't. Instead, all of them are central enterprise land kings.

Who's democratic vote is listened to in the end.

People are the real market economy, and they will only intervene in times of economic crisis, and the ideology of the capitalist system in the United States and China's socialist system is opposite, and people are not separated from each other? So there are no central enterprises.

You see, the United States is open, but China is not.

Regarding the king of the land, the unemployment rate in the United States is now 10%, so how can there be time for that.

There are two types of land prices in the United States, those who live in New York and those who live outside New York. China lives in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen, and outside Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, and Shenzhen.

The central enterprise is an enterprise in which the people of the whole country are shareholders, to put it bluntly, the people of the whole country are investors, do you say that he is poor in money? The characteristics of central enterprises are more money, more money so the right to rent-seeking is inevitable, they are like a stick in the market everywhere to stir up, during the second session in 2008 our prime minister just said in the reporter's question, housing prices should be in line with the people's income, etc., the end of the meeting, the central enterprise of the king of the land will come out, that strange people's congress deputies said, since he has so much money, the people of the country can consider sending 3,000 yuan, although the money has not been issued, but it shows that these interest groups are very stubborn.

First of all, central enterprises and state-owned enterprises are not parallel concepts. The central enterprise is a state-owned enterprise and a kind of state-owned enterprise. The concept as opposed to central enterprises is local state-owned enterprises.

Central enterprises and local state-owned enterprises are collectively referred to as state-owned enterprises. State-owned enterprises are big concepts, central enterprises are small concepts, and central enterprises are a kind of state-owned enterprises.

In international practice, only enterprises belonging to a country or a federation can be called state-owned enterprises. In other words, there is no concept of "local state-owned enterprises" in international practice, and state-owned enterprises and central enterprises are the same thing. Of course, foreign localities** can also invest in the establishment or holding of enterprises, but these enterprises are usually not considered state-owned enterprises.

Of course, there are state-owned enterprises in the United States, and of course the overall scale is certainly not comparable with the state-owned enterprises in Chinese mainland. The largest state-owned enterprise in the United States is generally considered to be the Tennessee Valley Authority, founded in 1933.

It is a piece of land, when it is transferred, through the form of "bidding, auction and listing", one of the state-owned enterprises auctioned the land at a sky-high price beyond the public understanding, then this land is the king of central enterprises.

Let me tell you a personal experience: at the end of 08, there were more than 400,000 cash plans for buying a house, and a mortgage of 6% down payment could have been made. But I tried my best to disagree (the old man and the woman are conservative), and used 200,000 yuan to make a 3% down payment, and another more than 200,000 yuan to buy the index ** ......

So do you think I'm in violation? The more than 200,000 yuan I put into the market is my own funds, or is it the help of the bank? In the same way, last year and this year, most of the cattle in the land auction in various places are central enterprises, many of which are still not listed.

Is it true that the funds they have auctioned at sky-high prices are all their own, without a penny from the bank? If it's like this, it's pretty regular. In fact, the leader is playing with words, and all he has been emphasizing is that not a single penny of the state's credit funds is used for real estate.

In fact, it is nothing more than that the contract states that the huge amount of money I lent him is used to buy equipment, and you have no evidence to prove that I lent him money to buy land. Or maybe the money he paid for the land was only lent to him by my younger brother (place), and it was none of my business......Who to fool? Let's look at the people's IQ too low.

Didn't you explain it? The land plot that the central enterprise buys with the most advanced price is called the land king.

The king of central enterprises is the first state-owned enterprise to participate in the real estate industry. Make money, with local real estate enterprises in the real estate bidding process due to the wealth of the country. The real estate ** soared, so that the housing prices remained high.

That is to say, the central enterprise takes the most advanced plot, and this plot is called the king of central enterprises.

Answer: The central enterprise land king means that the controlling shareholder or actual controller of the real estate enterprise is a state-owned enterprise, and at the time of bidding, it will obtain the final ** bid for the land by exceeding all bidders.

The so-called land king refers to the most expensive ** auction to get the land management open right, there is a great speculation concept, the current central enterprise land king appears frequently.

Enterprises whose controlling shareholder or actual controller is a state-owned shareholder enter the real estate industry and bid for land at a unit ** that exceeds a certain standard at the time of bidding.

The unit ** or total ** is much more than the corresponding ** of other similar lands.

**In the flipping house...

I dare to say that no leader in **** dares to stand up and say "depressing housing prices". After all, there are so many factors in this ... **At most, it is superficially built "affordable housing".

But how many ordinary people are qualified to buy this? If it has anything to do with it, it's better to say something, haven't you seen a lot of luxury cars parked in the garage of those "affordable houses" in the news?。。

Alas! So let's not talk about that. If you have money, you should buy a nest as soon as possible and settle down first. I think this house price will still have to rise in the future...

Didn't you agree on the ** system?