Is coordination covalent bond an intermolecular force?

Updated on science 2024-06-30
11 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    The term coordination covalent bond is not very commonly used and is generally said to be a coordination bond. Coordination bonds can be divided into two categories, one is called electricity price allocation, and the other is called covalent alignment (do you mean covalent covalent bonding?). Or does it refer to any coordination bond in general?

    The difference between these two coordination bonds is a bit like the difference between ordinary ionic bonds and ordinary covalent bonds. The former mainly relies on the Coulomb force combination between positive and negative charges.

    The latter mainly relies on the lone pair of electrons in the ligand body "flowing" to the ** region of the bonding two nuclei, reducing the electric potential energy of the system to form a bond (electrons "flowing" between the nuclei, effectively reducing the mutual coulomb repulsion of the two nuclei).

    In either case, the coordination bond is about the interaction between two atoms (due to the different distribution of electrons), and it would be inaccurate to say that this interaction is "the attraction of the electrons of one molecule to the positive nucleus of another molecule". However, there is no absolute standard for whether the coordination bond belongs to a chemical bond or an intermolecular force, and a strong interatomic interaction is considered a chemical bond, and a weak interaction is considered an intermolecular force. In fact, some coordination bonds (such as coordination bonds in ammonium roots) are about the same strength as ordinary ionic bonds or covalent bonds, such coordination bonds belong to the category of chemical bonds, and some coordination bonds (such as coordination bonds between oxygen atoms and some metal ions in ether) are very weak, which are equivalent to the usual intermolecular forces, and such coordination bonds should belong to intermolecular forces in principle.

    In the latter case, we generally do not consider the formation of new molecules (or ions) after a weak coordination.

    As for the "weakest attraction", it is even more unfounded. As mentioned above, some coordination bonds (i.e., those found in some of the most well-known typical coordination compounds) are very strong, comparable in strength to other chemical bonds, and not weaker than others.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    A coordination bond is formed by the combination of an atom with a lone pair of electrons and an atom with an empty orbital, that is, the coordination electrons between the atoms come from the same atom.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    In terms of intensity and electronic configuration, there is no difference between coordination bonds and covalent bonds.

    It is generally believed that the coordination bond is a covalent bond.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    It can be distinguished by the following three different points:

    1. The formation process is different: ionic bonds.

    It is the electrons that are gained and lost between atoms to form anions and cations.

    Then the anion and cation are formed by electrostatic action, covalent bonds.

    It is formed between atoms by sharing electron pairs, there is no gain or loss of electrons between atoms, and there are no anions and cations in the formed compounds.

    2. Different directionality during bonding: ionic bonds have no directionality when bonding, while covalent bonds do. Ionic bonds are chemical bonds formed by electrostatic attraction between cations and cations.

    An ion can equally attract oppositely charged ions in any direction, so the ionic bond is not directional.

    Whereas covalent bonds are quite different, the formation of covalent bonds is an electron cloud of bonding atoms.

    If the electron cloud overlaps and the more the electron cloud is defeated, the greater the density of the electron cloud between the two cores, and the stronger the covalent bond is formed.

    3. Different properties: covalent bond is a kind of chemical bond, two or more atoms use outer electrons together, and ideally reach the state of electron saturation, and ionic bond is a kind of chemical bond, which is formed after two or more atoms lose or gain electrons and become ions. This type of chemistry tends to form between metals and non-metals.

    Overlapping forms

    The electron cloud theory reduces the formation of covalent bonds into overlapping forms, which are divided into the form of bonds and bonds.

    The bond is an s orbital of two nuclei.

    Approaching each other is similar to the form of heads meeting. The bond is a covalent bond formed in the way the p orbital shoulders touch the shoulders close together.

    Bonds are more prone to breakage as compared to bonds, so it leads to ethylene (chch) and ethane.

    ch ch) is not very consistent in nature.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    The intermolecular force, known as the van der Waals force, is the weakest.

    The bond energy corresponding to the chemical bond is generally greater than the energy corresponding to the intermolecular force, so the chemical bond is generally stronger than the intermolecular force.

    Covalent, ionic, and metallic bonds are all chemical bonds.

    The three are generally not directly compared with each other, and it is best to give a comparison of specific substances, but in general: covalent bonds of atomic crystals, ionic bonds, metal bonds, such as covalent bonds, if they belong to diamond, they are generally the strongest; Ionic bonds belong to ionic compounds and are relatively strong; Metals generally do not have a particularly high melting and boiling point, and are slightly weaker.

    But: hint, this is just a general rule. For example, ionic compounds take sodium chloride; Metal bonding takes metal tungsten. Obviously, the metallic bonds of tungsten metal are stronger than the ionic bonds of sodium chloride (by melting and boiling point comparison).

    Intermolecular forces exist and are generally weak. Therefore, molecular crystals generally have a lower melting and boiling point, and there are more gases and liquids.

    Hydrogen bonding is a special action that sits between chemical bonds and intermolecular forces.

    So give a general order:

    Covalent bonds of atomic crystals, ionic bonds, metal bonds, hydrogen bonds, intermolecular forces.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    Both covalent and ionic bonds belong to intramolecular forces. Intramolecular forces refer to the interaction forces between atoms inside a molecule, which can affect the physical and chemical properties of molecules. Both covalent and ionic bonds are chemical bonds formed by sharing or transferring electrons between primordial cavities within a molecule.

    Specifically: Covalent bonds are chemical bonds formed by sharing electron pairs, which are formed by two or more non-metallic atoms sharing their outer electrons. Covalent bonds are usually formed between non-metallic atoms, and their electron clouds overlap to form a shared electron pair, allowing the atoms to share outer electrons to form chemical bonds.

    Ionic bonds are chemical bonds formed by electrostatic interactions between oppositely charged ions, usually between metal and non-metal atoms. A metal atom loses one or more outer electrons to form a positive ion, while a non-metal atom accepts these electrons to form a negative ion. These positive and negative charges attract each other to form ionic bonds.

    Therefore, both covalent and ionic bonds are intramolecular forces that affect the structure and chemical properties of molecules.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Covalent bonds belong to intramolecular forces. It is impossible to form covalent bonds between different molecules, otherwise two molecules become one molecule.

    There is no size and direction of ionic bonds, as long as there are ions, other ions with opposite charges can be formed into bonds by electrostatic action, so ionic bonds are not intramolecular forces. Zhenzhou.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Yes, the full name of a coordination bond is a coordination covalent bond, which is a special type of covalent bond. When the electron pairs shared in a covalent bond are represented by one of the atoms alone, it is called a coordination bond. Once the coordination seepage bond is formed, it is no different from a general covalent bond.

    What are the conditions for the formation of a coordination bondA coordination bond is a special type of covalent bond that is not formed by the meeting of any two atoms. It requires that one of the two atoms forming a has a lone pair of electrons, and the other is a "empty orbital" that accepts lone pairs of electrons, so the coordination bond is expressed as a b, a is called a ligand, and b is called the central atom or ion.

    Sometimes, in order to enhance bonding ability, the central atom or ion B uses empty orbitals of similar energy to hybridize and then receive lone electron pairs with ligand atom A. Coordination bonds can exist both in molecules (e.g., H2SO4, etc.) and in ions (e.g., ammonium ions, hydronium ions, etc.).

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    1..Basically, the coordination keys in high school are all keys. A coordination bond, also known as a coordination covalent bond, or simply a coordination bond, is a special type of covalent bond. A coordination bond is formed when the electron pairs shared in a covalent bond are made up of one atom alone and the other atom providing an empty orbital.

    2.Once the coordination bond is formed, it is no different from a general covalent bond. The two electrons shared between two atoms that form a bond are not provided by each of the two atoms, but from one atom.

    For example, ammonia and boron trifluoride can form coordination compounds: **where denotes coordination bonds. A pair of electrons between n and b comes from a lone pair of electrons on n atoms.

    3.The simple coordination bond is a bond, and a little more complex, such as the coordination bond formed by a metal ion and a carbon-carbon double bond, is a bond bond, which is not very stable, and only a small number of compounds can be stable and pure.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    It's a big difference.

    Intermolecular force refers to the force that is purely between molecules or between atoms of noble gas, also known as van der Waals, which is essentially generated by electrostatic interactions between molecules or atoms. These include inducing, dispersion, and orientation forces. The essence is the dipole, instantaneous dipole, and induced electrostatic attraction between the dipoles.

    Covalent bonds are chemical bonds formed between atoms that are non-polar or less polar and have less polarity in a situation where they share electrons. For example, H-H in the H2 molecule, Cl-Cl bond in the chlorine molecule, and the force of the van der Waals force between hydrogen and chlorine molecules is the intermolecular force.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    1. Covalent bond is a kind of chemical bond, two or more atoms use their outer shell electrons together, ideally to reach the state of electron saturation, thus forming a comparatively limb or stable and strong chemical structure called covalent bond.

    2. The coordination bond is a covalent bond. The two electrons shared between the two primordial harukos that form a bond are not provided by each of the two atoms, but from one atom.

    3. The difference between the two: a covalent bond is generally one that both sides of the bond provide electrons, and a coordination bond is one side that provides lone electron pairs and one side that provides empty orbitals.

Related questions
13 answers2024-06-30

Water is a polar molecule, and the O-H bond in the water molecule is a polar covalent bond. >>>More

6 answers2024-06-30

Covalent bonds contain coordination bonds; Covalent bonds are divided into polar and non-polar, with the same atom forming non-polar bonds (such as each elemental molecule, etc.), and different atoms forming non-polar bonds (such as in each covalent compound); Coordination bonds are mostly polar (e.g., in ammonium), but a few are also non-polar (e.g., thiosulfate, etc.).

10 answers2024-06-30

Na2O has two O's?

If you are talking about two Na, then pay attention to their structure, the structure of Na2O2 is roughly Na O-O Na (the outermost electron is not drawn), where O-O is a peroxide ion, negative divalent, and there is a non-polar covalent bond between two oxygen atoms. The peroxide ion is connected to the NA by an ionic bond. The structure of Na2O is roughly Na o Na (the outermost electron is not drawn), Na is separated by O, and Na generally forms ionic bonds with other elements. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-30

The positive valence is the one who loses electrons, and the negative valence is the one who gains electrons. Polarity, looking at the two elements that make up the compound, the farther apart they are in the periodic table, the more polar they are. This is the easiest and most practical way to judge against high school. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-30

Hydrogen bonds, ionic bonds.

Covalent bonds are names given by people to distinguish the different interactions between particles. Ionic and covalent bonds belong to chemical bonds. >>>More