Online reported that a man was detained for 269 days without being at the scene of the crime, can he

In this case, he can apply for compensation and can get compensation. According to Article 32 of the State Compensation Law of the People's Republic of China, the payment of compensation is the main form of state compensation. Where the property can be returned or restored to its original state, the return of the property or restitution to its original state is permitted.

Article 33 stipulates that where a citizen's personal liberty is violated, the daily compensation shall be calculated on the basis of the average daily wage of the State employee in the previous year. If bodily injury is caused, medical expenses, nursing expenses and compensation for the loss of income due to lost work shall be paid. Where partial or total loss of ability to work is caused, disability compensation shall be paid.

According to reports, on September 30, the man received a criminal compensation decision from the Tongbai County Procuratorate in Henan Province: agreeing to give him a total of 120,000 yuan in state compensation. Among them, the compensation for personal freedom is more than 10,000 yuan, and the spirit is more than 10,000 yuan for comfort.

Here's the thing, Chen Debao and Qi Zhongping, young people from Tanghe County, rushed into a hairdresser on the evening of January 20, 2015 and smashed things inside, but on the night of the crime, Qi Zhongping was in Tangshan, Hebei Province, far away, and was not at the scene of the crime, but he was arrested and detained for 269 days.

In fact, we can find that there are not a few cases that have been mistried or misjudged in our country, the most well-known of which is Zhang Yuhuan's case, he was acquitted after being detained for 27 years, from Zhang Yuhuan's self-report, we know that it was because of words and deeds to extract confessions, torture into confessions, so the formation of unjust cases, after the sentence, continued to appeal, but did not get a response, until the pursuit of the truth of the countryman Zhang Youling helped contact reporters and lawyers, the case was reorganized. Although the state gave compensation, the 27 years were priceless, and he was wrongfully imprisoned for 27 years, with his mother and children waiting for him at home.

Social stability requires judicial fairness and impartiality, and the procuratorate has a very good saying: It will never let go of anyone who created an unjust case back then, and those who know the law and break the law should also be severely punished.

He was not at the scene of the crime but was detained for 269 days, and the compensation decision shows that it was decided to compensate Qi Zhongping according to the scope of compensation under the "State Compensation Law", including more than 10,000 yuan in compensation for personal freedom and more than 10,000 yuan in spiritual comfort. It is possible to apply for compensation.

OK. Because during the 269 days he was imprisoned, he lost his freedom, many rights in his life, his basic life was disrupted, and his reputation was damaged, and he deserved compensation.

It is definitely possible to apply for compensation, which is an unjust case. The parties may apply for relevant compensation from the relevant departments at the national level through legal proceedings and civil mediation.

So I think there was also a lack of behavior on the part of the people who handled the case at the time. Of course, this incident has also reflected some problems, and I hope that the relevant departments can learn from this, and the arrest of criminals must also be justified and evidence-based, and good people cannot be wronged.

Because the local authorities told him that you made a guilty confession and interfered with the handling of the case, he should bear a lot of responsibility. So the man was imprisoned for 269 days, but in fact this statement is untenable and needs to be further explained.

The procuratorate believed that the man's confession of guilt interfered with the procuratorate's handling of the case, and that he bore relatively large responsibility for the decision to approve the arrest, so even though the man was not at the scene of the crime, he was sentenced to 269 days.

** claimed that he made a guilty confession, interfered with ** investigation, and had an impact on ** arrest and solving the case, so he was detained.

When the man submitted an application for state compensation to the Tongbai County Procuratorate, he received a reply that he had made a confession of guilt, interfered with the procuratorate's handling of the case, and was very responsible for the decision to approve the arrest. So he was imprisoned for 269 days.

From a simple point of view, because the man was suspected of smashing a barber shop with other personnel, he was arrested by **During the court's trial of the group, one of the men showed his alibi. At this time, the man has been locked up for 269 days.

1. Incident combing According to a report on the Internet, a group of people rushed into a barber shop in 2018 and smashed the barber shop, and then was arrested by **. and indicted the group.

When it came time for the court hearing, one of them showed an alibi. The man testified that he was thousands of miles away in Tangshan, Hebei Province, on the day of the incident, and could not have been at the scene of the crime, because the evidence had changed, so the man was acquitted, but because the man was detained for 269 days without reason. So the man filed a complaint with the court for compensation.

3. The most strange thing written in the last incident is why did the man sign a confession when he was not guilty? And the rest of the accomplices also said that although he was not present, they were all instructed by him to smash the barbershop. And now that the man has been acquitted, the incident seems to be going in a confusing direction.

What do you think about this?

A group of people were charged by the police for allegedly smashing a barbershop. But when it came time to file a lawsuit in court, the evidence changed. One of them had ample evidence of an alibi.

The man, who did not commit anything, was not at the scene of the crime but was held for 269 days, before finally appealing to a higher court and finally receiving compensation.

After the Tongbai County Procuratorate transferred the five people to the court for prosecution, the evidence changed: on the night of the crime, Qi Zhongping was thousands of miles away in Tangshan, Hebei Province, and it was impossible to be at the scene of the Tanghe crime, but he was detained for 269 days. When he submitted his application for state compensation to the Tongbai County Procuratorate, he received the following reply:

You made a confession of guilt, interfered with the procuratorate's handling of the case, and bore a great deal of responsibility for approving the arrest decision.

Previously, a group of people rushed into a barber shop in 2018 and smashed the barber shop, and then was caught. Making a confession of guilt interferes with the procuratorate's handling of the case, and bears a great deal of responsibility for approving the arrest decision.

A group of people were prosecuted by the police for allegedly smashing a barbershop, but when the case was filed in court, the evidence changed, and one of the people involved had sufficient alibi to prove his innocence, the whole case has changed.

1. Details of the incident In March 2018, when the Tongbai County Public Security Bureau of Nanyang City, Henan Province was investigating a gang-related case, it also cracked a backlog of cases that had not been solved by the Tanghe Public Security Bureau for three years, and there were 5 people who rushed into a barber shop in January 2018 and smashed it, and when the county procuratorate filed a lawsuit with the court, the evidence of these 5 people changedOne of the people involved in the case was thousands of miles away at this time, and it was impossible for him to be at the scene of the crime, that is, this person was confirmed to be innocent. So the innocent man was released, and by this time he had been imprisoned for 269 days.

2. After the incident was released, he submitted an application for compensation to the procuratorate, which rejected the application for compensation on the grounds that he had obstructed the administration of justice by confessing his confession. Then he reported the matter to the discipline inspection, and the discipline inspection also sent relevant staff to investigate, and also expressed doubts about this case.

Because this person was originally innocent, but he signed a confession, the whole case has become a bit confusing, and now the relevant parties have intervened in the investigation. The actual circumstances of this case will depend on subsequent developments.

Third, my personal opinion is very strange about this matterThese five people were identified as criminal suspects because the other person confessed to the other person, and he instructed the five people, and four of the five people also admitted to the incident, and only one of them has always refused to admit guilt. When the matter was handed over to the court, it was suddenly discovered that one of them had a sufficient alibi, and he was released, then the remaining 4 people were sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment. The development of the incident is still pending a follow-up investigation.

The law is just, and if you make a mistake, you will be held accountable.

Being detained for 269 days while not at the scene of the crime must have something to do with the cause of the accident, and the judgment of the relevant court should be viewed correctly, and the court will give a complete answer to the final criminal case.

In the process of handling criminal cases, there are often some unjust, false and wrongly decided cases, but our political and legal system is earning these past mistakes and putting an end to future mistakes.

You were detained for 269 days without being at the scene of the crime, and you admitted to participating in the incident, and you said that you were not at the scene, which shows that you are trying to confuse the truth and make false evidence, indicating that you are still guilty, and as for being detained for 269 days, you sue again, and the court and ** will give you the correct verdict.

Not at the scene but locked up for 269 days, really. It's miserable.

Not at the scene of the crime, but was **269 days, I think this may be a problem of appropriate law enforcement, or for the lack of evidence, the implementation of the case is too strict, there is no respect for the facts, there is no respect for a sentence, there is no respect for the relevant provisions of the law, it can also be said that there is a problem with the degree of grasp of the legal business, or it can be said that the evidence is insufficient, and I am afraid of making mistakes after release.

According to the normal state, this is to catch the wrong person, but Zhao Wrong still doesn't remember to admit it, and locked up people, this behavior is not right, just wait for the follow-up. Notification and processing results, we can't say anything about this, I haven't solved any problems.

Everyone is equal before the law, and everything is done in strict accordance with the law, and everything is based on facts.

The occurrence of some wrongful cases requires that our country should improve our legal system and improve our investigation level, so that there will be no unjust and wrongly decided cases, and only in this way can we ensure people's safety.

Not at the scene of the crime but detained for 269 days, this explanation. His luck was very bad, and the fact that he encountered ineffective staff members also showed that the judicial system and some other things needed to be improved.

For the judiciary is doing the right thing, we should: Deep reflection. This is an act that violates humanity and should be resolutely stopped and opposed. Not at the scene of the crime has **267 points, which is an extreme phenomenon.

Chen Debao, Zhu Minggui, Zhang Feng, Qi Zhongping, and Li Qianlong, five young people from Ma Zhenfu Town, Tanghe County, rushed into the Guilisi Hair Club at about 8:30 p.m. on January 20, 2015. Afterwards, he was arrested and brought to justice.

When the Tongbai County Procuratorate transferred five people to the court for prosecution, Qi Zhongping's evidence changed, and the evidence showed that Qi Zhongping was working in Tangshan, Hebei Province, thousands of miles away, on the day of the incident, but the place of the incident was in Tanghe, so he was proved by a full alibi, because the evidence was true, and then the man was released.

However, because he was detained for 269 days without reason, Qi Zhongping expressed dissatisfaction, and then submitted an application for state compensation to the Tongbai County Procuratorate, but was refused, and the procuratorate's reply to this was: You have made a guilty confession before, interfered with the procuratorate's handling of the case, and bear great responsibility for the decision to approve the arrest. In other words, he is already responsible, so I think it should be resolved through negotiation.

This one is a little confusing. Well, when applying for state compensation, the procuratorate did. He was detained and convicted of the stage.

Statement. What is the process in this, should be investigated again, could it be a trick from the torture zone? As a last resort.

to make a statement of guilt. I think a normal person, who has not violated the law and committed crimes, why would he say that he committed these things. That's big doubt.

The Jia Yuan case has occurred from time to time, and this is because our society is still relatively backward in society, and some technical means are still relatively ineffective, which has caused the occurrence of these wrongful cases, so it is required that our country should improve our legal system and some tea steamers, as well as improve our reconnaissance level, and dare to go green, only in this way can we ensure people's safety.

I know that the law is fair, just and open, and because information is now more open, everything that is not public will be disclosed, so we will adopt relevant policies to explain. We should also believe that our laws are fair, just and open, and we have been locked up for 269 days without being at the scene of the crime, and now we have received our relevant explanations, the Tenderloin Policy, so our laws are still relatively fair.

I think the cause of this incident was that he first provided false evidence. In this case, he was not held legally responsible, which is already good. If it weren't for his interference, then the suspect could have been brought to justice earlier. I don't think the court was wrong.

This should be that the police were detained in a lawful situation, although he was not at the scene at the time, but he interfered with the police's handling of the case, and the detention is normal, and the state should not compensate him.

Being detained for 269 days without being at the scene of the crime shows the dereliction of duty of the law enforcers, and such a thing must be prevented.

Although it is said that he was not at the scene, there must be evidence or that there is a motive for the arrest. And in the process, you can complain or clarify in your own way.