Why did the germination of Chinese capitalism not arise in the Song Dynasty, the most economically d

Updated on history 2024-06-24
12 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    First of all, you have to understand that history is a process of development, the economic development of the Song Dynasty you said is only a huge development compared with the previous dynasties, you have to understand that in fact, the economic development of the Ming and Qing dynasties is far more than that of the Song Dynasty, although the Ming and Qing dynasties closed the country, ** the restrictions on agriculture are stricter than the Song Dynasty, but this is a trend, is a tide, no one can stop it. During the Ming and Qing dynasties, the development of the commodity economy reached a certain level, and the qualitative change gave rise to employment relations, and the germ of capitalism appeared.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    I remember reading a book that said that the Song Dynasty happened to be the second ice age in human history, the global climate became colder, and the living conditions of ethnic minorities in the north became worse, making them desperate to invade the south. In this case, although the people of the Song Dynasty had great wealth in material and cultural life, and the best treatment of civil servants in history, the Song Dynasty still maintained a fairly large regular army in history, and because the Song Dynasty had a place to raise horses, the main force of the army was still infantry, and it was very high in the war with foreign races, plus the Song Dynasty was full of countries, and the people who were actually under the jurisdiction of **** were definitely not as good as the Yuan, Ming and Qing dynasties, discrimination and imprisonment against women began in the Song Dynasty), what about men, and only women who are constrained by morality and etiquette are left, how can the germination of capitalism be produced? !

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Uh, upstairs is the right solution! The Song Dynasty was just a representative of the pinnacle of the feudal dynasty! But you must know that until the end of the Ming Dynasty, before Huang Zongxi proposed that industry and commerce were all fundamental, the feudal dynasty's basic emphasis on agriculture and suppression of commerce seriously limited the scale of handicrafts.

    In the end, the root cause is China's small-scale peasant economy! The biggest characteristic of the small-scale peasant economy is self-sufficiency, and it is impossible for a narrow market to develop capitalism!

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    There is foreign aggression, survival is a problem, how can we talk about development!

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    During the Ming and Qing dynasties, economic development led to the emergence of employment relations.

    This was the beginning of the germ of capitalism.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    No matter how economically developed the Song Dynasty was, it was impossible to develop into capitalism, which was determined by the social conditions at the time, and the Song Dynasty was still a feudal country through and through.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Because although the Song Dynasty had a developed commodity economy and the sprouts of capitalism sprouted, the small peasant economy was still dominant at that time, so it was useless to continue to develop.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Because it is not possible to complete the primitive accumulation of capital. In ancient times, the concept of agriculture was serious, and after obtaining profits, businessmen often did not expand reproduction, but purchased land and returned to become landlords.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Because the Song Dynasty was politically clear, the people lived and worked in peace and contentment, and people were content with a stable and quiet life, while at the end of the Ming Dynasty, the society was turbulent, and the people lived in poverty, so they could only obtain a way to survive from other aspects.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    Because in the Song Dynasty, people's lives were very good, people were content with the status quo and did not make any changes, and at the end of the Ming Dynasty, social turmoil made people have such ideas.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    Because the previous Song Dynasty was paving, it was able to sprout in the Ming Dynasty, and our country is an agricultural society, so it is very difficult.

  12. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    The commodity economy was essentially the mutual exchange of goods, and did not form a capitalist employment relationship, and the Song Dynasty did not produce the germ of capitalism at this time. At this time, the main economy of the Song Dynasty was a self-sufficient small-scale peasant economy.

Related questions
8 answers2024-06-24

Looking at the origin of world capitalism, Britain appeared in the wool textile industry, Venice appeared in the shipbuilding industry, and China appeared in the silk textile industry, it can be seen that in feudal society, capitalism could not have originated in agriculture, but could only have originated in the labor-intensive industry of handicrafts. Southern China is different, sericulture silk textile industry is a low-cost and high-yield industry, all that needs to be done is to invest a huge amount of human labor, family workshop production has been unable to meet the needs of production, so the workshop owner will ask acquaintances to help in his leisure time, and pay a certain amount of remuneration accordingly, over time, the capitalist employment relationship will arise, the bankrupt peasants who can not be exploited by the landlords will live on the remuneration obtained by "help", and the workshop owners will gradually break away from labor and become capitalists, Thus the primitive capitalist relations of production are formed.

6 answers2024-06-24

It's so absolute, I think it depends on the level of prosperity. >>>More

16 answers2024-06-24

Renaissance: The most fundamental reason is religious oppression, which restricts literature, art and thought, and the bourgeoisie needs to resist, so there is a revival, and a very thick humanistic environment is needed. In the 14th and 16th centuries, the only country in Asia with sufficient cultural heritage should be China, but at that time, it was the Yuan and Ming dynasties, and the whole country was a imperial examination system, and it was necessary to learn Confucianism in order to enter the official career, and it did not restrict the people from learning other ideas. >>>More

9 answers2024-06-24

At that time, the world pattern was still in chaos, and what was needed for development was a peaceful environment, both external and internal, which China did not have at that time, so China at that time could not go through the capitalist road or the socialist road, and after World War II, the world pattern was stabilized, and China could take the socialist road relatively smoothly.

8 answers2024-06-24

This is due to the fact that in capitalist countries, the capitalists always pursue the maximization of profits, which makes them constantly expand the scale of production, and the state power cannot effectively control this because it is in the hands of the bourgeoisie, and when the output exceeds the aggregate demand of society to a certain extent, there will be factory closures and economic depression caused by "overproduction". To put it bluntly, it is because of the lack of necessary regulation.