How to publish the perpetual motion machine for middle school students?

Someone has invented a perpetual motion machine since the last century, and there are still people doing it. n Many scientists have already told you in the name of science, impossible.

Theoretically speaking, it is feasible to achieve perpetual motion, as long as there is no energy loss during the energy conversion, for example, the ball is shaking with a rope, assuming that only the gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy are converted, it is completely possible to perpetually move, but in fact, due to the friction between the ball and the rope, the friction between the ball and the surrounding medium, etc., the energy has been lost. The preliminary confirmation of what you are saying is only a conclusion based on further reductions in energy losses.

In addition, the so-called perpetual motion machine, its internal energy is conserved, and it provides energy to the outside, that is to say, he produces energy out of thin air, what kind of power is this, this is the power of God!

This is not possible in terms of what you have been exposed to in middle school. But the spirit is commendable, the courage to question the textbook and the authority must be preserved, and perhaps one day in the future, your perpetual motion opportunity will change the fate of all mankind.

I don't believe it, but the spirit is commendable.

Truth be told, there is absolutely no perpetual motion machine in the world.

Can you tell us about your invention, though?

You're kidding. It's just your guess. There will be a loss in the process of doing work.

I also thought I could do perpetual motion machines. It's kind of ridiculous to think about it now, though.

I also wanted to come out.

It's magnetic, I don't know if it counts?

Find the teacher first**, and if you think it's really okay, ask the teacher to help release it by the way.

But... Personally, I don't think it's very likely in terms of my current knowledge.

Looking for **, looking for a local physics research institute, university.

Is it really possible?

First of all, you have to be clear:

The scope of intellectual activity (ideas, etc.), scientific discoveries, new biological species, nuclear changes, diagnosis of diseases, and methods of ** are not patentable.

Second, patents should be novel, inventive, and practical.

1. You can apply individually and provide a copy of your personal ID card (if middle school students don't have it, you can take your family's or don't use it).

2. Offer your innovations.

Article 26 of the Patent Law Where an application for a patent for invention or utility model is made, a request shall be submitted, including a written request, a description and an abstract thereof, and a statement of claims.

The request shall clearly state the name of the invention or utility model, the name of the inventor or designer, the name and address of the applicant, and other matters.

The description shall give a clear and complete description of the invention or utility model, which shall be subject to the realization of it by a person skilled in the art to which it belongs; Where necessary, drawings should be available. The abstract shall briefly describe the technical points of the invention or utility model.

The claims shall be based on the description and state the scope of the claimed patent protection.

Article 27 Where an application for a patent for design is made, a written request and documents such as ** or ** of the design shall be submitted, and the product to which the design is used and the class to which it belongs shall be indicated. ）

3. Pay the fee (if you apply in person: appearance 75, utility model 75, invention 560; **Company fees vary).

4. The acceptance will be issued on the same day, the appearance will be authorized in about 8 months, the utility model will be authorized in about 10 months, and the invention will take about 3 and a half years; Authorize the issuance of payment of annual fees.

5. Protection period: 10 years for appearance and utility model, 20 years for invention, calculated from the date of application.

In addition, an introduction to patents:

The term "invention" in the Patent Law refers to a new technical solution proposed for a product, process or improvement thereof.

The term "utility model" in the Patent Law refers to a new technical solution suitable for practical use proposed for the shape, structure or combination thereof of a product.

The term "design" in the Patent Law refers to a new design that is aesthetically pleasing and suitable for industrial application made from the shape, pattern or combination thereof, as well as the combination of color and shape and pattern of a product.

Application? If you have developed a theory of perpetual motion machine, you only need to publish it in some top scientific journals, such as Science and Nature, and you will easily become famous and known all over the world. If you directly build the machine of the perpetual motion machine, you only need to take the design drawings to the patent office to apply for a patent, and someone will test your machine, and if the test is successful, you can get the patent.

Secret arrests? Conspiracy theories are too much. Since you talked about the perpetual motion machine, we have to talk about the definition of perpetual motion machine, which refers to the fact that you will always do work outside without obtaining energy from the outside world, that is, your machine cannot deliver fuel to it from the outside, wind energy, solar energy, tidal energy, geothermal energy, electrical energy, bioenergy, and can always be the best energy to the outside world, such as power generation.

The perpetual motion machine violates the law of conservation of energy, violates the concept of objective scientific laws, and therefore, cannot be realized. Perpetual motion machine is a kind of so-called machine that can continuously move and do work without external input energy or energy, or under the condition of only one heat source, and can do work forever without consuming energy.

The Law of Conservation of Energy: Energy neither arises nor disappears out of thin air, it only transfers from one object to another, or from one form to another, while in the process of transformation or transfer, the total amount of energy remains the same.

The second law of thermodynamics: It is impossible to draw heat from a single heat source and completely turn that heat into work without any other effects.

Therefore, in terms of working principle, the idea of a perpetual motion machine violates the basic laws of thermodynamics, so it is impossible to realize it at all. The four fundamental laws of thermodynamics are the most solid laws in natural science, and they are the crystallization of hundreds of years of science and technology and experience, and so far there has not been a single case of violating the basic laws of thermodynamics.

Please explain how your invention works.

Which reclusive scientist are you?

Theoretically speaking, the perpetual motion machine is not feasible at all, scientists have long argued that it is impossible, so who and when the research of the perpetual motion machine must be fake, the news about this cannot be true, for example, the perpetual motion machine must first absorb external energy, and then it can work, the machine must have an energy difference in absorbing energy, and the generation of energy difference must consume energy in advance, so there can be no perpetual motion machine.

Your ** topic is too big, and there are many generally accepted scientific theories that are both natural and social sciences, how can you deny them all? It's something that can't be done. If your denial is wrong, it is impossible to win the prize, because the innovation competition is to reward scientific things, and will never reward wrong things.

If you want to deny that a problem or a concept must be well-reasoned, and it must be scientific, you can't just use imagination to explain your reason, for example: "perpetual motion machine" is generally accepted as unscientific, if you want to deny it, then you have to come up with real people to theoretically overturn people's accepted scientific theories.

Do you know the definition of perpetual motion machine?

It's a machine perpetual motion machine that doesn't input energy but constantly outputs energy, and it has nothing to do with motion.

It's all about whether energy can be generated out of thin air.

Unless the law of conservation of energy can be broken.

Otherwise, a perpetual motion machine is impossible.

At this stage, no one has been able to prove that the law of conservation of energy is not true.

It is impossible to conserve energy.

If energy is conserved, then where does the first energy come from? Even the universe has a process of birth, doesn't energy need to be born? Could it be that energy existed before the universe was born?

Even if there is energy and then there is the universe, how did the energy come from in the first place?

If someone says that energy is transformed by mass, then how did the original mass come about?

If energy also needs to be born, then it means that there was no energy before the birth of energy, but now there are all kinds of energy, from non-existence to existence, how can it be called conservation?

The perpetual motion machine does not exist, but it is just a self-consolation that human beings have not yet understood the laws of nature.

If you don't unravel"Universe"Or the mystery of the birth of the universe before the universe, all science now can only be called pseudoscience.

Energy is not generated, only transformed.

If you want to move, you must have energy; To be "perpetually moving", you need eternal energy.

The so-called perpetual motion machine, in our life, is not realizable, because it is not the ideal environment to do physics will often see, assuming that there is no resistance, the plane is smooth and frictionless and other ideal conditions.

Zhang Heng's experiment, whether he flies for 3 days or 5 days, will eventually fall.

Finally, let me tell you that celestial bodies are not endless, but they are in perpetual motion for a long time, why are there meteorites? That is, the celestial body has detached itself from its original orbit, that is, it has ceased from its previous "perpetual motion". The movement of celestial bodies requires more energy, like the Earth, which is produced by the balance of the gravitational pull of the sun and the gravitational pull of the moon.

Do you know how much energy the sun emits every day when it burns, (it does not stop erupting locally)?

See for yourself.

No, no, the ancients can only call it a dexterous mechanism, that is, a delicate mechanical device. And some people's so-called perpetual motion machines, if you look at the historical perpetual motion machine models, you will find that these things either lack the analysis of force or violate some basic laws of physics. In fact, a perpetual motion machine can be achieved under ideal conditions, but this can only be ideal, in a condition without friction and no air, a gyroscope can rotate endlessly.

The law of conservation of energy is the truth, and those who proposed perpetual motion machines at that time, instead of thinking about how to reduce useless work, got into their own thinking circles, so it was stupid behavior.

I am afraid that the "solo flying wood carving" can only be said to be a flying device, not a perpetual motion machine. "Those who study and invent perpetual motion machines are stupid" denies the purpose of "perpetual motion" rather than the spirit of invention.

"Motion is absolute" is to include the entire material world as the scope of study, while the "perpetual motion machine" that human beings want to invent is a narrow "once and for all", so the former is not a reason to pursue the latter.

Zhang Heng's wood carvings will stop because of air resistance and gravity, and it is definitely not what you say. The earth will one day be planted in the fire pit of the sun, not to mention a woodbird who wants to get rid of the shackles of the earth.

According to the law of conservation of energy, there will inevitably be friction, resistance, and so on in the process of motion of an object.

The development of applied sciences always comes after the development of the foundation. As it was first discovered, cutting magnetic inductance lines can generate electricity, and then there is the generation and application of generators. It wasn't someone who accidentally made a generator and then figured out that cutting magnetic inductance lines could generate electricity.

Similarly, Albert Einstein published the mass-energy equation, and then there was the study of the atomic bomb.

The possibility of a perpetual motion machine is based on the law of non-conservation of energy, which unfortunately does not exist yet. Therefore, there is no need to engage in perpetual motion machines now, but it is better to study the reality of the law of non-conservation of energy first.

So people who study and invent perpetual motion machines are still stupid.

Perpetual motion machines and motion are associated.

Now we are paying attention to environmental protection, so it is recommended that you use things like domestic waste to make some inventive products, which will inevitably gain something.

Big brother: Pay attention to the word innovation...