What do you think about the fact that restaurants include appropriate food ordering in their assessm

In fact, there are pros and cons to this matter, and the original intention of the restaurant must be to reduce the occurrence of waste on the table, so this starting point is very goodBut ordering is not just something that the waiter can decide, but also the needs of the customers. Some people have big eyes and small bellies, so they like to order a lot of things to eat, and they really can't eat so much, so it will cause waste, but in fact, the waiter doesn't recommend so many things to them. <>

But there is also a situation where the waiter orders a commission, so they will vigorously introduce their dishes to the customers for which they have a commissionThis can also lead to waste at the dinner table, but it is not a bad thing to attribute this kind of thing to employee evaluation. We all know that since the CD-ROM action was promoted, many people have the idea of taking it home in their minds, and the idea is very good, after all, this dish was bought with their own money, and it is natural to take it back if they can't eat it.

On the other hand, it also avoids food waste, and you can finish the dish after the second meal. If this regulation is introduced, the waiters will definitely see that there are leftovers and actively provide suggestions to customers, provide packing and help them pack home, and in this way, on the one hand, it reduces waste, on the other hand, the waiter's assessment will not be deducted, after all, many people will now be embarrassed to pack home for the sake of the so-called face. <>

The waiter's recommendations and suggestions also just avoided this kind of face-saving behavior of the guests, and the habitual thinking of ordinary people is to pack it back, basically they will not throw it away again, but will reheat it and eat it. So I personally think that this policy is better, is that both sides can urge each other, eliminate waste, after all, the Chinese population is so large, and the amount of food wasted a year is also very large, the world is hungry There are countless people, so not wasting food is a very good behavior, and it has very good educational significance for children.

This kind of assessment is unreasonable, and the staff can remind the guests to order the food appropriately, such as reminding the guests to pack when there are too many left, but the guests' behavior is not the reminder of the staff to achieve constraints.

I think it's great, it's a good thing to prevent waste, it's amazing.

I agree with restaurants to include the right amount of food in the assessment. Ordering food in moderation is conducive to cherishing food, responding to the call of the country, including this method in the assessment, and helping the staff to better guide the guests to order, which is a very effective policy.

This is actually a positive energy operation. At present, the phenomenon of food shortage and waste in the country is very serious, so in response to the country's call for saving food, the restaurant launched this system, which is also to remind everyone to save food.

The purpose of this is to remind consumers not to order too many dishes to avoid waste. Incorporating this into the assessment is conducive to the implementation of catering personnel in their actual work.

Incomprehensible. Whether or not to order food is a personal choice, and restaurants cannot force people to order, and it is also included in the assessment.

Ordering food in moderation is actually a mandatory self-control for us. With the improvement of our living standards and the continuous progress and development of science and technology, the standard of living has been improving and rising, so for us, food and clothing can no longer meet us, but to eat well, but because there are many choices now, we may ignore our appetite and ignore the scope of our control every time we order food, and finally lead to the phenomenon of not being able to eat waste.

Let each of us be healthy and maintain a certain nutritional balance for a long time. In every respect, this is a very good phenomenon. And when we don't accept these policies that are included in the assessment, we should also control them selectively.

It is important to keep yourself healthy and nutritionally balanced, and to avoid wasting food.

This is indeed an effective way to eliminate waste, because many people in society now pay great attention to assessment results.

No. Eliminating waste depends on personal awareness, and it has nothing to do with ordering, and most of the ordered meals can be taken back.

Of course, yes, this method is very outstanding, very effective, and can be a good way to curb extravagance and waste.

Since elementary school, we have learned that "who knows that Chinese food is hard work." This poem teaches us to save food, not to waste food, and it is not easy for farmers to grow crops. Adhering to the traditional virtues of thrift and thrift, the state is now implementing the "CD-ROM Action" to eat in restaurants, put an end to arrogant ordering, and to eat as much as you want, and not to waste.

Recently, in addition to setting up the slogan "no leftovers, no leftovers" on the table, a restaurant in Xi'an has also included an appropriate amount of food in the monthly assessment of waiters, and points will be deducted according to the amount of leftovers from customers. This was done to urge the waiter to remind the customers to order the appropriate amount of food, which played a great role, and most of the customers finished the meal, and the unfinished food was packed and taken away. The restaurant also made the dishes into different sizes, and also reduced the decoration of the dishes, which is largely to eliminate waste.

1. Civilized dining

People's lives are getting better and better, and people often go to restaurants outside for parties or dates, but sometimes some people order a lot of dishes in order to fill the scene, often they can't finish it, and they are afraid of losing face and not packing, which causes a lot of waste. It is not easy for farmers to farm, we must eat in a civilized manner and be a CD-ROM family, which not only saves food, but also reduces environmental pollution.

2. Restaurants around the world learn from Xi'an restaurants

After the start of the CD-ROM action, citizens from all over the country have responded, and there are very few people who "order food arrogantly", and many restaurants are like the restaurant in Xi'an, implementing the practice of "including the monthly assessment of waiters with an appropriate amount of food", reminding guests to consume rationally in a timely manner, and everyone is a CD-ROM family.

3. Publicize more in the community

The CD-ROM action can not only be followed in the restaurant, it is the same when you go home, you should not waste a grain of rice when you eat at home, we are strict at the same time, but also educate the children to be diligent and thrifty, think that there must be many people in the world who have not eaten, so it can not be wasted.

In this way, the waiter will help customers order rationally and consume rationally, and there will be no constant recommendation of customers to order for profit. The restaurant is also in response to the call of the country to save food and eliminate extravagance and waste.

In order to have a positive image of not wasting food in their restaurants, some businesses have set such an assessment goal for restaurant waiters, so that the waiters can urge customers who come to the store to consume to do "CD", which I personally think is not appropriate.

In order to save food and not cause waste, because the waste phenomenon on the earth is still very serious, and there are still many people who have a problem eating food, so it is advocated to order as much as they can.

Because the phenomenon of waste is too serious now, they all advocate taking meals in moderation, taking as much as you eat, and including this in the assessment, I also hope that the waiter can play a role in reminding and supervising.

In order to save food. Food shortages and food waste are now very serious, so it is necessary to put an end to food waste.

Localities have taken measures to treat table waste, starting from Wuhan where 10 people order 9 people, and a nationwide wave of rejection of waste has been set off, which is a sight that people want to seeWhen everyone devotes themselves to refusing to waste, society will become a better place. Restaurants include the right amount of food ordering in the assessment, which is also a way; After the customer finishes eating, the remaining food on the table will be deducted from the waiter, and the score will be directly related to the salary as an assessment standard; This prompts employees to remind customers to order in moderation before eating, which will greatly reduce waste at the table.

Over time, customers will form a habit, and they will have the awareness of ordering an appropriate amount of food, and they will also form a sense of saving, which is a very meaningful thing. However, this system still needs to be improved, and the requirements for employees are too high, which is likely to cause employees to work hard and complain, but do not get the wages they deserve. This is not good for both the restaurant and the staff, and ordering food in moderation is not a matter for the staff, only good measures will make a real difference, rather than blindly deducting the staff.

In the service industry, the customer is equal to God. The waiter cannot force the customer to order the appropriate amount of food, but can only remind the customer on the side, and at the same time need to pay attention to the service attitude, too frequent reminders will make the customer tired. So, it's a challenge for employees.

If you encounter an arrogant and unreasonable customer, it is very likely that you will not pay attention to this reminder and still go your own way, and the repeated persuasion of the employee is still fruitless; In this case, the employee should be allowed to appeal the deducted points; The employees are trying their best to complete the task, but it is unfair to deduct the salary because of the customer's unreasonableness.

Therefore, in order to implement this measure, first of all, the supervision system should be improved, so that the scores are more real, and employees are allowed to appeal; If a restaurant wants its employees to try to get customers to order less, then they shouldn't be penalized after the employees have worked hard. Secondly, there should be rewards for punishments, and employees with outstanding performance can be rewarded, and relatively reducing penalties will motivate employees to work hard. Finally, there must be a bottom line for deducting points, and employees can't be left unsecured because of ordering food; The service industry is already very hard, and employees should be guaranteed to live in a secure way.

The inclusion of appropriate food ordering in the assessment will not affect the quality of employees' meals. The inclusion of appropriate food ordering in the assessment is to better respond to the national policy and cherish the food, which will not affect the quality of the employees' meals, but can effectively use the food.

Yes. When catering enterprises evaluate employees, the core indicators should be the quality of service they provide as service personnel, such as whether the service is in place in a timely manner, thoughtful and decent, etc., which are all factors that employees can control through their efforts. If the "whether the dining customers are wasted" that employees cannot control is also included in the work evaluation, it will not only make employees at a loss in providing services, but also mean that catering companies can deduct employees' performance for "unwarranted" reasons.

This kind of operation will inevitably cause resentment among employees, and may be projected to the service level, which will eventually affect the operation of the restaurant, and the gains outweigh the losses.

Yes. Employees will be dissatisfied because of this regulation, and employees will only order the number of meals that meet the regulations, resulting in a decrease in the quality of meals.

I think it must be, so that the quality of the meal can be improved and there will be no waste.

So this kind of behavior is very reasonable and necessary.

This behavior is reasonable, because it can encourage people to cultivate food conservation awareness from the perspective of the restaurant.

I think it's reasonable. Although ordering food is the right of consumers themselves, ordering food in moderation is not only conducive to reducing food waste, but also can better improve the efficiency and speed of takeaway delivery by merchants.

I think it's reasonable. Because merchants have certain restrictions on consumers' orders, they can minimize extravagance and waste.

I think it's very reasonable to allow the waiter to persuade customers not to order more and prevent food waste.

This behavior is reasonable, because now the phenomenon of people wasting food is becoming more and more serious, and many people do not have the awareness of cherishing food, so it is so.

Plausible. There is a lot of waste in food in our country every year, and any action to eliminate waste should be supported.

My view on this is that yes, but it's not necessary. After all, the waiter belongs to the service industry, and the ordering behavior is the customer's ordering, and the waiter's role in the customer's meal is just to make suggestions, tell the customer which are the signature dishes, what dishes are suitable for the taboo guests, so many people, how much should be ordered is the appropriate amount, and help the chef pass the dishes, etc.

And to ensure that there is no leftover food at the table, whether the customer orders the right amount of food is the customer's business. Isn't it strange that incorporating an appropriate amount of food ordering into the waiter's assessment is equivalent to indirectly asking the waiter to manage the customer?

Let's start with a few simple assumptions:

First, a group of customers come to the restaurant and ask the waiter to recommend a signature dish for them, and after the waiter has finished announcing the name of the dish, he asks the waiter to serve a large number of dishes, including the signature dish, and it is estimated that they may not be able to eat the leftovers. So as a waiter, should you discourage customers and let customers order a little less in order to assess? So what if the customer doesn't listen?

What should the waiter do if he refuses to serve food for the sake of assessment? Or beg customers to be a little less? Or tell the customer directly, you may affect my assessment, please go out, don't eat here? Either one doesn't seem right, right?

In the second case, a group of customers come to the store and order the appropriate dishes according to the waiter's recommendation, but for some reason, these people eat less and have leftovers, but they are not ready to take them away.

So what should the waiter do? Of course, the right thing to do is to persuade the customer to pack, but what if the customer doesn't listen? Do you force customers to pack or find a way to quietly dump the leftovers while the staff is not looking, or take the leftovers home yourself?

Either way, it doesn't sound right, right?

In my opinion, you can add the right amount of food to the waiter assessment, but it's important to remember that this assessment is not the only criterion for judging a waiter. After all, being able to persuade those who want to order more to order less, and persuade those who don't want to pack to pack, can only prove that this waiter is eloquent, has strong empathy ability, and is an excellent person. And the other waiters who can't do it can't say anything, after all, no restaurant asks for it:

You work as a waiter with me, and you have to have excellent eloquence to make every customer you serve disc.