Narcissistic questions about philosophers or writers who behave badly

Updated on culture 2024-06-09
10 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Nietzsche: That's not narcissism, please go and read his book first, it's OK?

    He said this because his philosophy itself was a radical rupture and rebellion against humanity.

    I've never heard of narcissism, but there are a lot of people who don't have a rigorous attitude towards sexuality, and I think if you want to study your subject, you must first understand the context and culture of the times, such as attitudes towards human nature, sexual freedom, etc.

    The second is to study the philosopher's family environment and life experience.

    And then it depends on whether he wrote the book to make a name or make money, or just to tell the world what he thinks.

    I would like to recommend a few people to study Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Freud, Russell, I didn't see you just now, and you said that writers can also be.

    It's even better if it's a writer, because it doesn't need to be as philosophical as rigorous, like Milan Kundera and Haruki Murakami.

    Especially these two people are relatively open to sexual attitudes, and it is recommended that you focus on research, and there must be a clear explanation at the beginning of ** narcissism and sexual indulgence are just attitude issues, not the fundamental criteria for studying a famous person, let alone the standard for commentary, you must remember,

    In particular, when you write**, be sure to state your own standards for these at the beginning.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    "I greet you from the distant past, beyond the abyss of time, clinging to those things that once held us together. - Jaspers takes the stories of eight of the greatest and most perverse philosophers in the history of philosophy. Read.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    (1) The state is the organ of political power in which the economically dominant class exercises class rule. (2) State power is the core and fundamental issue of politics and the most important and powerful tool of class struggle. The decisive significance of which class the power is in the hands of the class.

    Only by politically grasping and maintaining state power can we consolidate our economic dominance and realize and safeguard the fundamental economic interests of our class. (3) The purpose of confusing the question of the state by bourgeois scholars is to conceal the class essence of the bourgeois state, and their method of confusion is always to distort the class nature and role of the state.

    This is an essay question that tests the understanding of the meaning and essential attributes of the state and politics. The key to solving the problem is to grasp the purpose of "confusing the national problem" in the second question, and first understand the essence of the state, and then organize the answer.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Landlord, you are wrong!

    Philosophers are not narcissistic, but lonely.

    Philosophy is originally a lonely science, because too few people in this world look at life and everything from a philosophical perspective, so philosophers look at non-philosophical people and think that they don't understand, which means that they don't understand the way of thinking of philosophy;

    Philosophy is divided into many systems, and there are differences, contradictions, and struggles between these theories themselves, and when there is a conflict between one theory and another, both sides of the philosophy will say "you don't understand", which is actually an error in concept.

    So, philosophers have nothing to do with narcissism.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    No, they are all miserables, trying to save those souls, but they don't do anything because their philosophy tells them that it can't be done.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    In this way, the landlord can be called a philosopher.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Philosophy is derived from the Greek word"φιλ"(philo-sophia) translated, meaning"A love of wisdom".a"A love of wisdom".People are narcissistic? Does it seem like it's possible?

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    Narcissism isn't the only one in this world, right?

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    I don't know if you're referring to the concepts of writer and literature, or if it's a concept that corresponds to folk writing.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    For example, I often look in the mirror, and I often pay attention to my image and tidy up my image. For example, they will often brag about themselves, and they will often be self-centered. For example, he is very self-confident and naturally optimist. For example, when encountering things, they are not afraid of hardships and dangers, and they do not know the difficulties and retreat.

Related questions
12 answers2024-06-09

The Pythagoreans were not allowed to eat beans, they were not allowed to trample on beans, they were not allowed to eat the hearts of animals. It is said that when Pythagoras was being pursued by his enemies, he was caught and killed because he did not want to step on the bean field. >>>More

4 answers2024-06-09

1. Sometimes the longing evoked in the distance is not a strange place, but a call to return home. – Benjamin. >>>More

6 answers2024-06-09

The founder of the philosophy of Miletus, as well as the founder of Greek philosophy, was Thales (624 BC, 548 BC). Thales was a Phoenician Miletus who was revered as the progenitor of all Western philosophy. Born into an aristocratic family, he was a businessman, engaged in political activities, and observed and studied nature. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-09

Philosophers are not necessarily thinkers, philosophers study the relationship between consciousness and matter, mainly look at the universe, thinking and nature from a macroscopic perspective, and find out the universal laws of nature, society, and thinking, such as Kant and Hegel, while the history of thought mainly studies society, criticizes society, finds out the contradictions and loopholes in the existing society, studies society from the principles and policies of social systems and rulers, and expresses his own views through writing, discussion, and speeches, such as Voltaire, who is a great thinker, By writing a large number of books criticizing the decadent ideas and dark and backward feudal dynasties in French society at that time, the church promoted social development and social progress, but he was not a philosopher. Dale Carnegie once said, "Thinking produces new knowledge." That's why philosophers and thinkers love to think. >>>More

4 answers2024-06-09

Philosopher. True or False.

Fan Fan's generation. Little kiss. >>>More