The cost of falling in love is 15, the cost of falling in love

This is not necessary! I don't need you to invite me once, I'll invite you once, so obvious what you have!! Is it necessary for you to invite back the meal??

The waiter saw what he thought, "Wow, this man is a little white face" or something, he didn't feel good, + You're still a student, you haven't been employed, and you haven't had your own career, so it's normal for him to ask you, it's not normal for you to invite him!!

I think that's right! Don't spend other people's money indiscriminately!

Because, except for your parents, people outside are good to you for a purpose.

If the relationship can be certain, then you don't have to!

There's nothing wrong with that.

I think you're doing the right thing. But don't be so clear-cut.

He pleases you both. Three meals, you can invite him back. Or buy a small gift or something.

Don't always be one-on-one. lest he think too much.

It can be seen that you are a girl with more independence and self-esteem.

If the man is very macho, I want to maintain a relationship.

Then you're wrong.

In fact, it's just your character to do this, you are a very clear person, which can only show that you are not a person who relies on others.

But I mind you, if the relationship between two people is very good, there is no need to think about this, the one who has the money will pay it. This kind of thing cares too much and is not good for either party.

Get rid of you, be clear. In general, too. It's all men and women.

It's not good to say it because you want the girl to settle the bill. If you're a woman, it's okay to ask your boyfriend to check out. 5000 a month.

It doesn't cost that much to go out.

That's good, who rules that men spend money.

If true love is worthwhile, it's not really worthless.

Are you male or female? Seeing that your gender is male, the "he" you use is also male

Is it really a lot of money to fall in love? I think yes, falling in love is really money-burning, mainly in the following aspects.

The first one, when two people fall in love, they always have to meet and date, which means that they have to eat and meet, and in the process of dating, they need to spend some money.

When you are single, you can eat at will, just eat a little bit of brother chain things, and you can be envious if you can solve the problem of food and clothing. But after two people fall in love, they can't quarrel like this, even if they don't see each other every day, they have to get a discount at least once a week! When two people fall in love, they always have to date the person they meet, which means that in the process of dating, two people need to eat together, buy something and drink a cup of milk tea when shopping, and the cost of living will increase.

If you fall in love, two people don't see each other and don't date, so what does this kind of love mean? Dating means that it will cost money, so it also means that if you fall in love, the cost of living will increase and it is also a very money-burning.

Life is about rituals, and after falling in love, I think these rituals are more obvious and important. Although in various anniversaries, you don't need to feel guilty about the gifts you give, but if you only give you a few dollars at a time, it is better not to give it. Therefore, after falling in love, you need to give each other all kinds of gifts during holidays, and if it is a long-distance relationship, it will cost more to meet, which means that it will cost more to fall in love, which is a very money-burning behavior.

If you are in love, when a person is buckling the noose to you, it is also very unpleasant for such a person to fall in love, but when you are in love, you can't blindly spend each other's money, you should pay together and share the cost of dating, so as not to be looked down upon.

<> love is a relatively beautiful stage in everyone's life, and it also gives each other a companionship. Let us be far away, and become no longer lonely, with one more person to accompany and care.

However, during the relationship, there are also great expenses for couples, from the original single bill, to two bills.

For today's young people, falling in love also increases the cost of answering. I once saw such a data on the Internet, a young man born after 95, after calculation, will invest at least 20,000 yuan in love every year. This is a lot of money for young people.

So, should the common consumption of couples during the relationship be AA?

Support AA as it makes it a little easier for both people.

There are different opinions on this question on the Internet, and the first one is to support AA.

Indeed, most of the young people who are in love now do not have their own lives**, because they are still studying, so they still have to rely on their parents to provide living expenses. I don't have a financial **, if one party always bears the cost of love, it is also a lot of pressure for that party.

Therefore, for many young people, supporting the cost of AA has become the voice of many young people. There are a lot of expenses in love, and if two people share them equally, in fact, the pressure is very small for everyone and they can afford it. Therefore, it is actually a very good way to charge AA for two people.

There are many people who are not recommended to AA, and it is not recommended for couples to share the cost equally. There is a certain disparity in the family conditions of both couples, so one party may have a relatively high level of consumption, and if it is shared equally, the pressure on the party who is not in a good economic situation is really not small. Therefore, there are many people who do not recommend AA between couples, thinking that it is not necessary.

There are also a large number of women who support the view that it is not AA.

Because they think that a person who loves you will definitely be willing to spend money for themselves. They also usually ask their boyfriends to pay for meals, and pay for the clothes and shoes they buy, so that they can measure whether a boy loves them or not, so there is no need to AA.

Don't be absolute

There are also many couples who do not want absolute AA, because absolute AA is not conducive to the development of the relationship between couples. If the economic conditions of both parties are not very good, they can lower the consumption level of two people and choose some entertainment with relatively low costs.

And there is not every bill, both of them are very clear.

The best way to clear the shirt is that two people can take turns to pay for the meal, and if you buy something, you can also buy ** about the same, don't care too much about the amount. Give gifts to each other, you can also choose something you can afford, don't compare with others, so that the relationship between two people can be better, and the pressure on two people can be relieved.

When it comes to romance, the payment method for going out to eat can be based on the personal preferences and circumstances of both parties. There are two common ways:

1.AA system: Both parties share the bill equally, and each person pays their own expenses. This approach avoids overburdening, especially if there is a gap in the dispersion of the Blind Nuclear Clan, or if both parties want to remain equal.

2.Male Treats: Male students are responsible for all or most of the bills.

This way is seen in some cultures as an expression of gentlemanly manners, the care and respect that men have for women. However, this does not mean that the boy has to bear all the costs, but it is decided according to the agreement of both parties and the financial situation.

It's important to communicate and understand openly with each other when it comes to payment methods, respecting each other's perspectives and preferences, and finding what works for both parties. The most important thing is to establish a relationship of equality, mutual respect and communication, and to jointly negotiate and solve economic problems.