What kind of digital camera can you buy for more than 3,000 yuan, the best and more professional dig

Since it is a camera, the primary focus is on image quality and then portability and appearance, I personally recommend Ricoh's GRD, this machine is the king of small DC, using Sharp 8 million CCD, Ricoh professional large aperture 28mm wide-angle fixed focus lens, the imaging quality is definitely much better than other small DC, small and thin, and the shape is extremely cool. This machine is now much lower than the price, which is basically acceptable. In terms of appearance, the lens is not too flamboyant like the Samsung Blues, and the GRD telescopic lens is easy to carry and very low-key.

Candidate: Kodak V610 Imaging quality, color, quality, all good, cost-effective, beautiful appearance.

If you like rugged, I recommend the Olympus rugged camera 720, which has good image quality and is resistant to manufacturing.

Or wait for the DP1 launched by Sigma, this machine uses the same Foveon X3 sensor as Sigma's latest DSLR SD14, with an effective pixel of up to 14.06 million, a real three-layer CCD, and the image quality is fundamentally different from the current mosaic machine. As soon as this machine comes out of the GRD throne, it's time to give way to Xian.

Don't believe Sony's Cai Si head and don't believe Panasonic's Leica head, that's all JS used to fool, Nokia has several mobile phones that use Cai Si head, can it be said that Nokia's lens is the same as Sony's? In fact, it's all self-produced lenses and sticking cards.

Optical image stabilization is actually of little significance to wide-angle mid-focus lenses (there are two kinds of optical image stabilization 1, lens image stabilization 2, CCD image stabilization, most small DC use lens image stabilization, only Minolta X1 and Ricoh R series use CCD image stabilization, excluding Ricoh GRD) are all based on image stabilization to slow down the shutter speed to obtain a clean image, even if the camera is guaranteed not to shake, but the scene is moving, and the result is still virtual. If you catch up with the DC with a long shutter lag, the poor stabilization function is all wiped out. Therefore, professional cameras add image stabilization to the telephoto lens.

The key to determining image quality is whether the image sensor and lens aperture are large enough.

Fuji's picture quality is good (night scene) but the shopkeeper said that the quality is better, the quality of Fuji is not good, and it will be broken if you don't touch yourself for half a year.

Canon has softer picture quality and colors that are not as good as Kodak's.

Nikon SLR is good, small numbers are not good, the picture quality is dry, and the shutter lag is long.

Casio, Pros Small Fast Disadvantage Average picture quality. The Casio S500 is still good and cost-effective.

Samsung Blues is a fashionable brand, and the functions are very amateur, vase.

What do you mean by being more professional?

Appearance or function?

But in terms of appearance, the Fuji 5600 should meet your needs, around 2200, it looks a lot like that!

If you require a functional professional ......Basically, no, a machine at this price point, just a new product in the entertainment grade of the metropolis.

fuji5600 2250 yuan I just use this The effect is not bad.