-
1. The constitutional monarchy is the political system of the capitalist country, and the reason why it can be formed is because in the process of the bourgeois revolution at that time, the capitalists were basically born from the nobility in the feudal royal family, and they were inextricably linked with the feudal system, they needed the feudal system to protect their interests, and the feudal system needed these bourgeoisie to maintain their rule, so that they formed a relationship of mutual use.
2. The capitalist class compromised and retained the monarch, who was only a symbol of the state and had no real power. The bourgeoisie controlled the economic lifeblood of the country, and the feudal landlord class handed over the power of the mu to the bourgeoisie. In this way, a constitutional monarchy was formed.
-
The constitutional monarchy is the political system of the capitalist country, and the reason why it can be formed is that in the process of the bourgeois revolution at that time, the capitalists were basically born from the nobility in the feudal royal family, and they were inextricably linked with the feudal system, they needed the feudal system to protect the interests of their brothers, and the feudal system needed these bourgeoisie to maintain their rule, so that they formed a relationship of mutual use.
That is to say, the capitalist class compromised and kept the monarch, who was only a symbol of the state and had no real power.
The bourgeoisie controlled the economic lifeblood of the country, and the feudal landlord class handed over power to the bourgeoisie.
In this way, a constitutional monarchy was formed.
-
A constitutional monarchy is a form of government in which a hereditary or elected monarch is the head of state under a constitutional system. Constitutional monarchy can be divided into dual constitutional monarchy and parliamentary constitutional monarchy, and most of the world now has the latter. The monarch appoints the cabinet, the cabinet is responsible to the monarch, and the monarch directly holds the executive power, while the parliament exercises legislative power, but the monarch has the right of veto.
The dual constitutional monarchy has handed over the legislative power but retains part of the executive power from the first structure, the prime minister only assists the monarch to govern the country, the constitution and other laws are formulated by the parliament, and from the institutional point of view, the parliament formulates the constitution and laws to limit the monarch, and the monarch governs the country within the scope of the constitution and laws established in the system. Parliamentary monarchy, constitutional monarchy, the monarch hands over all power, the prime minister is the main executive of the country, the legislation is the same as the real monarch, from the institutional point of view, the constitution and laws are not used to limit the monarch but to limit the prime minister, and the prime minister can only govern the country within the constitution and laws. The disadvantage is that there is still a privileged class within the country, and the advantage is that constitutional government can be achieved without war.
-
1. The power of the monarch is limited by law, and the king is unified but not governed, becoming a hypocrite.
2. The parliament is the center of power (legislative power, administrative supervision power), and the cabinet is responsible to the parliament; (The Cabinet actually holds executive power.)
3. The power of the cabinet has swelled, gradually overriding the parliament.
4. The advantage is that it is more democratic and more conducive to the development of capitalism, and the disadvantage is that it is the product of the bourgeoisie's compromise with the feudal monarchy, which is incomplete and has the limitations of democracy within capitalism.
Constitutional monarchy is actually a mutual compromise between capitalism and feudalism, which ensures a smooth transition from feudal society to capitalist society. The French Revolution, a revolutionary form that completely overthrew feudalism, would have shed blood and sacrifices and cause great social turmoil, but it was more revolutionary.
Refers to the king. Beginning with the Magna Carta and continuing with the Glorious Revolution, the power of the state has hovered between the king and the parliament, but the general trend has been towards the parliament. It's a process of choice for a country: >>>More
The constitutional monarchy is to transfer the legislative power and executive power in the hands of the king and emperor to the constitution-centered Diet, but the country still retains the monarch, the world's earliest constitutional state, I think it should belong to Japan, and its emperor was already a symbol of the country in the feudal era (the general can be counted as the prime minister, the samurai law can be counted as the constitution, and the public can be counted as the parliament). >>>More
1. Three systems in one. The constitutional monarchy is governed by the monarchy. >>>More
Constitutional monarchy, monarchy, and federalism are three different state systems. >>>More