Helping someone introduce someone to say that the man has a house and a car, but who knows that he h

I think it is immoral for you to know in advance that the man has no house or a car, and you deliberately make up lies to deceive the woman and cause the woman to believe the truth and marry the man. However, there is no legal basis for such conduct in the current legal provisions.

You can't figure it out yourself, and you help people introduce people, saying that it's really not wrong to lie to people, but she should also investigate and verify, just because she said that she got married because she had a house and a car, and she still fell in love with the man, she was responsible, and it was not illegal.

The introducer only introduces the two parties to get to know each other, and then talk about marriage, which is a journey for both men and women to understand each other, is there a real house, a car and a deposit? They all have to understand each other, and they must be before they get married, at least they should know, they have reached the point of getting married, don't you know the situation at home? Everyone said yes to the introduction, and the rest is only for the two parties to get to know each other by themselves.

Since the negotiation is completed, don't care about these things, as long as both parties are happy, sometimes white lies are the most beautiful.

It's not illegal, but if someone else does, you will be blamed for any problems in the future. You can tell others the facts, after all, paper can't contain fire.

Unless they conspire to defraud money, then it is illegal.

After reading the question you said, this will never rise to the legal level, and your introducer is not intended to deceive people, maybe you don't know the specific true situation, the most important thing is that one of the two of them should ask clearly in the relationship.

Someone else helps you introduce the object, that is, just set up a line, and the person to talk to is still you who comes by yourself, and you don't know what the other party is like, so you get married, and now you can't complain about the introducer. The introducer is not illegal.

Breaking the law is not illegal, but against your heart, you lie and deceive other little girls, this is really not good, what kind of situation is what kind of situation, the little girl wants her to look everywhere with the boy, if you don't want to, forget it, don't lie to others.

If you take a benefit fee from it, it is illegal and it is fraud. If you deceive the woman just to promote this marriage, at least it is immoral and should be reprimanded by society, if the woman will think that she has been deceived and asks for a divorce, it will definitely involve you, so I advise you not to do this kind of immoral thing.

The introducer, Ming Chun, has no husband and introduces the object to you, I think this is the act of feeling, thinking that he can't do it like this, the most woman has become pure drunk, and will not deal with the object again.

It is not illegal for the introducer to introduce a woman to a woman knowing that she has a husband, but it is morally condemnable. The introducer should have been entrusted by this woman, otherwise he would not dare to introduce him privately.

If the other party did not get a marriage certificate. It's possible that he didn't have legal effect.

What can be cultivated slowly is not love, but habits. What you can get over time is not emotion but emotion.

This must be against the law, because your words are contributing to some crime, and then your words are the main responsibility.

Although this kind of thing is not illegal, it is against morality and will be morally condemned.

That's certainly not illegal, but it's morally moral.

Well, although this is not illegal, it is also immoral.

This kind of introduction is not stipulated by law, but this kind of introduction may be a character problem, so you can solve it.

This situation is that the introducer is doing boring things here, and you can talk to him.

It's not right to do this, and it's not a moral issue.

This is not an offence.

Yes, great! You will definitely be happy.

It is not necessary that the door is not the right household, and the statement of the woman's parents is required.

It depends on whether the two people have the idea of being together.

The world is so big that anything is possible.

Don't bully young people into being poor, and have foresight.

Men can only live a life in a low voice, and I don't think it's interesting.

It's better not to mismatch.

What's so annoying about this little thing, the road of life is very long, and I don't know how many things I have to encounter in the future, if everything is annoying, is there still any meaning in life? If you don't like it, just say no.

Either find another topic and shift the target. Either just tell them that you're not interested in him and ask them not to bring it up in the future.

You probably don't care about the boy's family conditions, you care about people, right? Since you don't like it, just politely decline. But don't you think about it again and meet this boy to get to know him better? Don't frustrate a great marriage. I wish you happiness.

You should be annoyed by the introducer, as well as the perspective and tone of the person, in fact, there is nothing wrong with the person, your attention should be on the boy himself, don't care about the introducer. Don't miss out on good opportunities. It is recommended that you decide after meeting once or twice before deciding on the trade-off.

Explain that you don't like this boy, and if you still have contact with him, keep in touch politely, and tell him what you think of your relationship at the right time, so that we can get together.

If you don't like it, don't say yes. Don't care what people say.

You can ask the person who brought it up to marry the rich boy himself.

This kind of person has nothing to do, and he doesn't have to worry about eating turnips!!

That's right, modern people, be realistic.

You're right, it's just not like you.

Yes, respect the woman's wishes.

Ask about assets before you have a good start to understand.

Originally, society is reality, who doesn't want to marry well, first of all, you put the man's assets in the first place, and then, the introducer should have told you the man's conditions, even if he didn't say it too clearly, he still said it roughly, and you asked your sentence, of course, the man also took into account, since you asked like this, it is obvious that there is a house and a car as a necessary condition for continuing to understand. So the man's reply to you is also rejecting you.

Through the man's reaction, it feels like he has violent tendencies, and it's better not to talk about it. Although your question is a bit straightforward, many boys are more sensitive, but it is normal to ask these questions when they are in love with marriage, it is better than those who are with men in the early stage, and when they get married, they say that it is not good to have no car and no house. In general, this man's personality is not good, and he has violent tendencies, so it's best not to talk about it.

It seems that he shouldn't or won't want to talk to you anymore!

Why don't you want to look at the object? Since your friend is kind enough to introduce you to someone, you can not read it but be sure to find a convincing reason, otherwise it will hurt your relationship with your friend, for example, you can say that you have been busy with work recently and can't take care of talking about friends, or you can say that you are not feeling well and need to rest more, etc., or directly tell your friend what you really think about you don't want to talk about your friend. In short, you should make it clear to your friends and not cause unnecessary misunderstandings.

If you don't want to see it, explain what you mean, I believe your friend is understandable, it doesn't hurt to meet, your friend is a good intention, fate can't be explained, maybe you fall in love!

You say you already have someone you like.

It's okay to worship money, the problem is that you can even be that ugly.

Two people have to live together for a lifetime, if there is no love, only money, it's too boring.

What do you have? You rushed to the house, the car went, what did people rush to you, even if you are okay now, you will not be young in two years, do you still want you? The divorce property is not yours either.

Is it so extreme to have nothing in material terms?

If the conditions are average or very hard, you can consider it, after all, you love each other very much.

But if having nothing is so serious, then it will not work, and it should be the result of his lack of motivation.

How old are you now, before you are 25 years old, I will choose the first answer, and after that I will choose the second answer!

I have already chosen the former, money can be earned slowly, but the man's family can't be too poor, a poor person delays not only you, but also your parents.

There is no material, you will go slowly in the future!!

I feel that the introducer must think that although the woman's family conditions are average, she has better personal aspects, such as good character.

After all, whether the two parties can come together depends on whether both parties have feelings, and family conditions are secondary considerations.

No matter how good the family conditions are, but the character is not good, who can accept it, marriage is two people coming together and going through the end of their lives.

Because girls want to find a man with better conditions than their own family Unless they fall in love, they generally will not choose to marry low The man has good conditions If you want to find a woman with similar conditions Unless it is a world friend Both families know each other The family is right Otherwise, girls with the same conditions as the man's family want to find more wealthy That is more conducive to the development of the mother's family.

Because it's hard for boys to find a girlfriend now. And there are more boys than girls.