Which interpretation of quantum mechanics do today s physicists agree with?

In the spring of 1935, Einstein et al.'s famous EPR** published in the Review of Physics provoked a widespread, intense, and long-term debate over the completeness of quantum mechanical theory.

It is now generally accepted that the incompleteness of the existing quantum theories discussed in the EPR** is considered from two aspects: reality and locality. With regard to reality, Einstein firmly believed that there is an external world independent of human consciousness, that physical theories can give a unified deterministic description of this external world, and that the experimental operations foreseen by such theories can, in principle, affect the external world itself.

Bohr, on the other hand, argues that what quantum mechanics can give is an indeterministic description of the phenomena formed by the interaction of the microscopic world with experiments. The focus of the disagreement is on the understanding of physical reality. The theory of latent variables argues that we should think of existing quantum mechanics as a form of statistical mechanics that only gives the average of the physical quantities to be measured, but at a level that is not attainable by deeper current experience, it is believed that each individual system moves according to strict deterministic laws.

It is hoped that determinism and causality will be restored in the field of microphysics, and that the division between classical and quantum phenomena in physics will be eliminated, and the theory of a unified physical world will be re-established. For example, in the field of quantum information, in order to understand EPR remote correlation, one needs to implement and control the latent variables implied in the remote particle holism. Of course, we can't make that dream come true yet.

The classical view of particles believes that particles mostly move in straight lines or circumferential curves, and the wave motion of particles is rarely seen --- the vector sum of translational particles and vibrations, that is, in classical particle physics, there is no or little mention of similar fluctuations of material particles, that is to say, in classical particle physics, there is no rudimentary form of matter waves or comparable objects --- fluctuations of particles; In wave physics, waves depend on matter --- wave medium (not wave carrier), and without a medium, waves cannot exist, so classical waves are medium waves. The carrier wave with particles as the carrier carrier is unimaginable, that is, in the classical wave, there is no description of the wave of the pure material of the particle --- the pure matter, so it is not surprising that the wave-particle duality of the non-material wave is derived. Because, in classical physics, there is no such concept, the wave of particles, to analogy with the idea of a newer quantum wave, the material wave of pure matter, is really difficult.

It is not easy to break out of the shackles of classical physics, although the complementary wave-particle duality is already a great innovation, but due to the incomplete interpretation, it will also give birth to greater breakthroughs, that is, the unity of wave-particles, the new interpretation of quantum theory and the revelation of ghost waves. The wave equation of a classical mechanical wave (1 or 1'Equation) can be broken down into two parts: vibration and translation.

Quantum entanglement is correct, it's just a name change. The particle fluctuation and force field potential energy explain part of the quantum uncertainty motion, and the mass particles come into contact with the four-dimensional force field to foam the microscopic space. The phenomenon of two particles moving relative to each other at hypervelocity is a description of the superposition of quantum fields, which describes the phenomenon of microscopic particles fusing with each other under certain circumstances.

One of the most important is the spectral discontinuity, which is described by the light quantum, which is characteristic of magnetron exchange. The quantum essence is the smallest unit of the smallest indivisible, but in fact there is no such particle as indivisible, then the essence is wrong! In addition, before the observation, the superposition of quantum uncertainty is simply illogical, completely relates all things with consciousness, and has been out of the scope of natural science.

A new solution to wave-particle duality: The quantum properties exhibited by elementary particles are all geometric properties of point-symmetrical finite four-dimensional space in three-dimensional space. All elementary particles with mass are singularities of a four-dimensional spatial structure, which is projected on a sphere in three-dimensional space.

That is, the singularity occupies the space of a sphere in three-dimensional space, but can only appear on the sphere and may appear at any point on the sphere at the same time, but only at a point in a precise position (unique but not fixed) that interacts with other particles.

For everyone's understanding, we project the singularity in a four-dimensional space in three-dimensional space, the projection is a three-dimensional model, just like a crystal ball is full of quadrangular pyramids on the spherical surface, which is also crystal, one next to another, in the actual four-dimensional space, the two faces opposite the adjacent pyramids are the same surface, and the vertices of each crystal pyramid are the same point - singularity, we can only see countless crystal cone tips in the three-dimensional space, but can not see the crystal cone and the crystal ball, When we touch it with one finger, we are always pierced by a crystal cone tip (the other cone tips disappear in an instant), and when we touch the tip of the cone in any direction with one finger, we will be pierced by it; When we touch with two fingers at the same time, only one finger is stabbed, but we can't know in advance which one will be stabbed. In fact, we don't have such slender fingers, but we do have a double-slit experimental setup.

I haven't found the answer to wave-particle duality, our eyes and cameras can't break through the speed of light, so we can only see wave one, but spectral interference is true, that means wave two exists, that means that a single photon stops time to wear once on the left and once on the right when it comes back, so we can only see it once, in fact, this is the same as quantum entanglement, it is really fast and not limited by time and space.

Science and technology are not for others to agree, right? As long as you have substantial results, you can strengthen the country and the nation, and even unify the earth! So why publish the results?

Need to be recognized? If you want to study quantum mechanics well, then let's see who tastes it for you, provided you can understand it.

Quantum mechanics does not agree with any of them, as long as it is a correct and useful theory, no one will disagree with it except for civil science!

Interpretation is to help understand the physical equations that have been experimentally proven, and it is not important to agree with them, but to logically agree with these equations.

Those who come here to talk at length about physics are basically civil sciences.

The Copenhagen School is mainstream.

Quantum mechanics is one of the most important inventions of mankind in the field of physics in the 20th century. Quantum mechanics and special relativity are considered to be the two fundamental theories of modern physics. Quantum mechanics is the study of the motion of microscopic particles.

A large number of experimental facts and the development of quantum theory at the beginning of the 20th century have shown that microscopic particles are not only particle-like, but also wave-like, and their motion cannot be described by the usual laws of macroscopic object motion. The establishment of quantum mechanics has greatly promoted the development of atomic physics, solid state physics, and nuclear physics, and marked the deepening of people's understanding of objective laws from the macrocosm to the microcosm.