Why is it that society generally promotes the idea that what you want is not what suits you best ?

Because in fact, what you want is not the same as what you are suitable for.

For example, if you get something you wanted at the beginning, you get it after working hard, but you find that it doesn't suit you.

Many people have had this experience, which is why they preach such ideas.

Many times you will have the thought of "what you want is not suitable for you, only what suits you is the best", or believe that "what you want is not suitable for you, only what suits you is the best", and then feel that your ideals are hit by this thought, and then give up, just because you are not firm enough in the beginning, and it has nothing to do with this sentence. Find what you really want, and then stick to it. After a relentless pursuit, what you want is right for you.

Don't forget the original intention, you have to always. "What you want is no longer suitable for you just because you have given up, because you are no longer worthy of your ideals, not because your dream is no longer suitable for you.

There is no need to regard it as a blow to the idea that "what you want is not suitable for you, only what suits you is the best", it can obviously be seen as a satire on people who easily give up their ideals: two people who pursue the same thing at the same time, the one who persists gets it, and the one who gives up halfway regrets: Hey, why didn't I stick to it?

Maybe I'll get it too. At this time, the successful person can gently throw out the sentence "What you want is not suitable for you, only what is suitable for you is the best".

Some people still stick to their dreams when they can't realize these needs, and finally achieve the highest level of needs: self-realization; However, some people hesitate and choose to give up their dreams when faced with the situation that the needs of the grassroots cannot be met. Just like Xu Lai, frustrated and frustrated, he succumbed to reality, and after getting farther and farther away, it is not realistic to pursue the so-called art, his former lover, and today's artist, okay?

If dreams can really be thrown aside when you don't need them, and can be achieved when you want them, then how unfair is this for those who are obsessed with chasing their dreams!

Hong Kong Yi and Xia Luo** are preaching that "what you want is not really for you", and they are clearly comforting those down-and-out uncles who can't get what they want. I don't know if you've seen the Youth School, but it makes it very clear that religion is used to comfort people when they are really desperate. If you have a little hope, you shouldn't comfort yourself that "the grapes you can't eat are sour", right?

Of course, there is a difference between Hong Kong embarrassment and Charlotte child paper, and the protagonist of Hong Kong embarrassment is really chasing his dreams, so he is even more sadistic. But not all movies are comforting, "The Return of the Great Sage" is a story of a down-and-out uncle who rises up after being inspired by the enthusiasm of children.

Ideals are based on the understanding of yourself, you don't even know what you really like and what you are suitable for, what is the ideal? Just by your own imagination of one thing? I don't feel the embarrassment of Hong Kong at all, and the only plot I can remember is that the goddess Xu Zheng said to Xu Zheng that your painting is terrible.

People are always obsessed with the love that they can't get, and it is called infatuation, in fact, most people don't really like that person at all, but they haven't met a better one or just three words "unwilling". The same goes for ideals. I think in my life, it is enough to know myself thoroughly, and if I can have a little insight into the world, it will be earned.

What you want is not the most suitable for you, which to a certain extent shows that people's pursuit is endless. When people get something, they still want to go for something better, and they often complain that it's not what I want.

In this fiercely competitive and unpredictable society, we can't be too honest, as the saying goes, people are good and are bullied. You have to disguise yourself, you can't put all your unhappiness on your face, you have to force a smile on people you don't like, and you can't speak ,......too directly

I think what the movie tells us is not to give up ideals, but to give up the unrealistic delusions that you don't have the ability, resilience and dedication to match, etc., don't indulge in them and lead to a bad life in front of you. If you think that's your ideal, first examine yourself to see if you're the material, then see how much you're willing to pay for it, and finally do it again to see if you can really do as hard as you think. If that's all right, then this is indeed your ideal.

If you can't, give up and be yourself in front of you.

Personally, I think that a lot of things that many people want are actually very difficult to get, and because they are so hard to get, that kind of thing is basically relatively unfamiliar to them, and it may not be suitable for them, and sometimes when they get what they want, they may find that sometimes the things they want are not as suitable for them as the things they have been using.

I don't feel that this idea is being promoted in general, but two films that are more recent happen to reflect similar themes. What the movie wants to express is that when you mature and grow, you may find that what you once dreamed of may be just floating clouds on the horizon.

Because many people are forced by the financial pressure of their lives to work in jobs that are not their favorite.

I haven't seen this kind of propaganda, it's just that there are people complaining.

Many people are always dissatisfied with the status quo, this mountain looks at that mountain high, and when you reach that mountain, it is better to go to this mountain. There's never anything completely satisfying in the world, you have to adapt to your surroundings, you can't adapt them to you.