If the boss wins the first instance against wage arrears, will the boss lose the second instance if

You won't lose. If the fact that the boss is in arrears of wages is established, and the evidence is sufficient, the appeal is useless. In the end, the arrears of wages were repaid in full.

The second instance will also lose. The employer or employer shall, in accordance with the provisions of the law, or the provisions of the industry, or according to the agreement between the employer and the employee, pay the employee's labor remuneration in the form of money. The boss is in arrears of wages, which is a violation of the relevant regulations.

Since he owes you wages, then he continues to appeal after winning the first trial, and he will definitely win the second instance if he owes you money and will lose.

If there are generally no special circumstances in the case of your boss's arrears to the company and winning the first instance of the lawsuit, and your boss appeals, the second instance will not be lost. Unless the opposing lawyer presents some new evidence or reasons, and is judged by the judge, it is not surprising that the court of first instance will rarely overturn the conclusion of the first instance if it wins the first instance.

According to the provisions of the Labor Contract Law, it is illegal for the boss to default on wages without reason, even if the boss appeals to the second instance, he will also win, you can rest assured.

The boss lost the first instance in arrears of wages, and the second is that he will not win. Our country stipulates that migrant workers are a vulnerable group and cannot be in arrears of wages. So, you are protected, and you will win.

How is it possible to lose? The boss owes the wages to the workers and does not pay them, which is the fault of the boss in the first place. It is also reasonable and legal for workers to sue their bosses.

Personally, I think that the boss realizes the salary and loses the boss. The second aunt boss won't win either. Because the hits or the workers are vulnerable. After all, he deserves you. Rest assured, he will definitely lose, very miserable.

If it were true that you were owed wages, I don't think he would have won. Because the law is fair, believe in the law.

I think the boss owes the money to the peasant workers, and what you are doing is not right, it is not easy for the peasant to come out, and he is also a breadwinner, I think your second aunt, you can't win, this is my personal opinion, over.

Mainly look at the factual evidence. If you win the first instance, you should win the second instance.

It is possible to claim compensation for bank interest, and there can be no other compensation. If you are an employee, you can claim severance after you leave the company.

Article 85 of the Labor Contract Law: In any of the following circumstances, the labor administrative department shall order the employer to pay labor remuneration, overtime pay or economic compensation within a time limit; If the labor remuneration is lower than the local minimum wage standard, the difference shall be paid; If the employer fails to pay the family baggage within the time limit, the employer shall be ordered to pay additional compensation to the employee at the rate of not less than 50% but not more than 100% of the amount payable

1. Failure to pay the labor remuneration of the employee in full and in a timely manner in accordance with the provisions of the labor contract or the provisions of the state;

2) Paying wages to workers at a rate lower than the local minimum wage standard;

3) arranging overtime work without paying overtime pay;

4) Dissolving or terminating a labor contract without paying economic compensation to the worker in accordance with the provisions of this Law.

You can ask for lost work expenses and transportation expenses.

Alas, alas

Where parties to a civil case are dissatisfied with the first-instance judgment of a local people's court, they may appeal to the people's court at the level above within the legally-prescribed time limit, of which the time limit for appealing against the judgment is 15 days from the date on which the judgment is served.

Legal basis: Article 164 of the Civil Procedure Law: Where a party is dissatisfied with the first-instance judgment of a local people's court, he or she has the right to appeal to the people's court at the next higher level within 15 days from the date on which the judgment is served.

Where a party is dissatisfied with a local people's court's first-instance ruling, it has the right to appeal to the people's court at the level above within 10 days of the date on which the ruling is served.