Why does history have to be evaluated at the end?

Take history as a mirror and correct yourself through history.

History is the history of the victors, and the victors are kings and the losers are just the winners.

Lesson. It's up to time.

Of course, it was dialectical.

Either summarize the lessons of the failure of the dynasty.

Or absorb her good side.

It's a must-do.

One aspect of being appreciated by posterity.

When you talk about history, it's about teaching you what you know.

Those dynasties played a role in China's progress.

The evaluation of history is a summary and a reference. There is only a distinction between mainstream and non-mainstream evaluations of history, and there is no distinction between correct and incorrect. Therefore, everyone can evaluate history according to their own knowledge and understanding, and there is no standard.

However, if you are a student, especially when it comes to exams, you should be aware of the current mainstream historical evaluation.

1。Because of boredom.

2。Because the attributes that people give to historical evaluation are victory and defeat, right and wrong, good and evil.

3。These attributes that you are talking about are subjective and not objective and can certainly be denied.

4。The evaluation criteria of history will be determined by the future man or the Martian.

Only by giving an appraisal of history can we draw lessons and lessons from history and learn from history.

Hindering the development of productive forces is evil.

The criterion should be judged by whether the productive forces can continue to develop after a certain period of history.

Giving an evaluation of history is not only a respect for history, but also a reflection on history.

People's standards are different, so the evaluations are not the same.

From a philosophical point of view.

All the history of fighting for the interests of the people is correct.

Everything that is detrimental to the interests of the people and harms the interests of the majority of the people is bound to be wrong.

However, it is necessary to look at the problem in two parts.

And then there is another sentence: justice is in the hearts of the people!

Dear, I'm glad to answer your <>

There are several considerations for whether the classic often talk can be used as a historical evaluation: 1Classical sayings often reflect the mainstream opinions and values of the time, but they do not necessarily accurately reflect the historical truth.

Historical evaluation needs to take into account a wider range of historical evidence and sources, as well as a balance of different perspectives, so it should not simply rely on the classic rhetoric of hail. 2.The formation of classical sayings is influenced by many subjective factors, such as political correctness and ideological trends at the time, which are likely to be biased.

Historical evaluation should have a more objective and comprehensive and rational judgment. 3.It is often difficult to escape the limitations of the times at that time, and it is difficult to generate a broad consensus in later generations.

A true historical evaluation needs to stand the test of time or feast, and needs to be examined in conjunction with the perspective and knowledge of later generations. 4.The formation mechanism of the classic often talked about the formation of shirt silver is not necessarily a rigorous historical study, but may be a simple folklore, misinformation or misreading.

Historical evaluation should be based on rigorous historical research. Therefore, although the classical sayings may reflect a certain amount of historical memory, they are relatively limited and subjective, and should not be directly used as historical evaluation. Historical evaluation also needs more extensive and in-depth research and analysis, and on this basis, a more comprehensive and objective judgment can be formed.

Classical sayings can be used as a certain reference, but they should not be the main basis for historical evaluation.

1. Influence refers to the role played by people or things, and evaluation refers to the nature, role, and status of historical events.

2. The impact should be considered from both positive and negative aspects, the impact includes both positive and negative impacts, and evaluation belongs to the category of meaning.

3. Evaluation is a summary of what an individual has done, and influence is the guidance of the development trajectory of future generations.

The meaning is positive and long-term.

The effect is positive and temporary.

The impact is both immediate and long-term, both positive and negative.

Meaning is the positive impact that a certain historical event can have on the subsequent historical development process, and it is not an event that affects it, but a historical process.

The role is the direct impact of a later historical event, and there is a direct correlation between the event and the event.

The scope of influence is large, as long as all the events that occur after an event are impacts, long-term and temporary, positive and negative.

Evaluation is to say the good or bad of this person or thing individually, and to evaluate the value of them. Influence is focused on what role it has in future history, whether it has promoted or hindered development. The evaluation focuses on the time and the impact is on the later.

An evaluation is a summary of what an individual has done.

Influence is the guide to the trajectory of future generations.

How to evaluate history correctly?

The long river of history is endless. The correct evaluation of history is to better restore history. To this end, we should look at history from the following aspects.

The basic principles of objectivity, impartiality and reasonableness must be applied. When evaluating historical figures or events, it is necessary to adhere to the standards of practice. Practice is the test of any truth, and it is also the only criterion for evaluating historical figures or events.

Although the subjective motives of the activities of some historical figures are good, the practical results are not necessarily good. Although some of them have bad subjective motives, their objective effects are unexpected by no one, and they may also promote the continuous development and progress of human history. In order to determine the role of historical figures in history, it is necessary to adhere to the criterion of productivity.

The basic criterion for judging a historical figure or historical event is mainly to see whether the historical figure or historical event conforms to the trend of historical development or promotes the development of social productive forces, and whether it promotes or hinders the development of productive forces and the progress of human society, which is the most basic criterion for determining the historical role of historical figures or historical events. What is promoted is progressive, and vice versa is backward or even reactionary.

History Is in the Past Tense As long as the present history respects history and respects the facts, it is the real history.

Fukuyama's attempt to assert history is always under the control of history, and his final conclusion, influenced by the historical background of the early nineties, is the product of this irony.

And not only is it limited by the historical context, but Fukuyama's system itself has some loopholes, and Focha Hungershan relies too much on Kojève's reading of Hegel to ignore its accepted biases and misreadings.

This led Fukuyama to misunderstand Hegel's "end", which did not claim that major changes would not occur after the end of history, but that the political changes brought about by "recognition" itself would no longer occur.

Fukuyama believed that the development of modern natural sciences and the ideology of liberal democracy supported each other, and that scientism would lead to liberal democracy.

However, this assumes the close connection between science and ideology, and even Hegel did not dare to make such a conclusion, relying on the Hegelian system to place the credibility of the final conclusion on a philosophical thought that is not the mainstream.

Therefore, the final conclusion of history has been ended by Fukulun Youshan himself.

Historical evaluation, regardless of the crowd, is mainly subjective. HistoryTheoretically, there are a thousand versions of history for a thousand people. However, reading history books, one can find a very interesting phenomenon, the older the age of a certain dynasty or a certain historical figure, the more objective and fair the evaluation of this dynasty or historical figure is.

Writer Yang Daxia said that time is the best evaluation.

1. Make a concise and concise summary of the content of the book reviewed, so that the reader can have a general understanding of the content of the book.

2. Commentary Attention should be paid to the scientific nature of the evaluation. It is necessary to be guided by scientific literary theories, to make comments based on facts, and not to arbitrarily elevate or belittle them based on personal intuition and prejudices. Be mindful of the originality of your insights.

It is necessary to repeatedly read, analyze, research, speculate, and taste, deeply understand and accurately grasp the object of criticism, and dig out the ideological significance and artistic characteristics of the work, so as to put forward their own novel, profound and incisive opinions; Instead of reading in a superficial and general way, the analysis does not get to the point, and only expresses some old, superficial, and vulgar opinions.

3. Use strong words and try to summarize your thoughts on the book briefly.

On the one hand, it is necessary to write an accurate and concise description of historical events, and on the other hand, it is necessary to have one's own sharp and unique views on them, not only repeating the original text, but also highlighting one's own components.

Thank you for history, thank you for history, go deep into history, and walk out of history.

A period of rise where challenges and opportunities coexist.