How does the sound quality of Edio U3 compare with Sony Avery and Dimeng?

No one is good or bad, the machines you compare are all at the same price point, and there is nothing to compare.

The only difference is the style orientation, what about the sound quality? The Karma and HD300 will be better, and the Apple IPC will have less coloration, (***** often see it used to evaluate headphones).

The Avery and Clix sound quality is very good, the vocals are well rendered, the Sony machine has strong bass, which is good for listening to rock, (the A805 has good resolution, but it is on the cold side).

Edio doesn't turn on the sound effect seems to be the same as ordinary ***, and it's completely different when it's opened, maybe Edio eats by sound effects!

If you want to collect *** with good sound quality, I suggest you collect some classics, after all, classics are not often there, such as: Dimeng, Innovation (hard disk machine, used to develop the *** market together with Dimeng, the machine was very good before, but now it doesn't work, and it succumbs to the market), the Meibo HD300 you said is also very worthy of collection, Avery and Clix are also very good, don't talk about the rest.

It seems that it is difficult to buy brand new ones, after all, except for Ailie, the others either withdraw from the *** market or give up the quality of their brands. (Clix is not out either).

I recommend Avery and Spinn Avery and flagship machines, the sound quality is good, needless to say, and the retro styling I like very much, hehe (it seems to be an upgraded version of Clix).

Karma's winning sound quality, in fact, is just like that, it's hyped. The more significant flaw is its midrange, which can only be said to be poor at this level.

As for the A806 S705 with Sony, it should be a matter of style, I don't like Sony's machine very much, but if your taste is heavier, then the S705 may be much stronger for you than the U3.

I haven't heard of Avery and Clix, so it's hard to say.

Regarding IPC, I think it is the most cost-effective and accurate sound restoration in the carry. I don't know what you think, but the premise is that the earbuds are good, at least to show the true colors of the IPC. In this regard, SE530 is recommended, and the sound is very good with IPC.

iPod classic can.

Iodi is just average, and there is still a gap with Sonybi, Avery and P20.

The first to recommend the Imperial League. It's a pity that it's hard to buy new goods.

Iodi is a good choice.

If you pay attention to sound quality, Meizu is the first choice.

If you insist on sound quality, go see Kenwood or B&O's flying saucer, this artifact is super powerful.

I don't say much.,**No limit to enter a Kenwood D9,It's not bad to enter a Sony torpedo if there's a limit.,1500 hard disk doesn't seem to have to think too much about it.。

Upstairs, please see it and then answer.

Lower than iaudiou3, not to mention.

Meizu garbage is also cold.

Take a look at it, I'm sure you'll like it

If you have any other questions, you can enter the OPPO enterprise platform to ask customer service questions!

If you listen to the pop, buy Sony's ** rendering is heavier, the bass is heavier, the sound is more than the pop, the sound of Avery and Aiodi is cold, the taste is very white, boiled water, suitable for listening to symphonies, classical and the like.

Hello, it is recommended to consider the oppo** mobile phone, because the oppo mobile phone has Dolby sound, and the sound quality is very good, thank you.

Kenwood, Imperial League, Meibo domestic machines and they are not comparable, not a grade Imperial League, the first *** manufacturer, but now it is bankrupt, but the machine can still be bought, not very good to buy Meibo, Korean brand, once brilliant, now in decline, there are also some good machines, but it is not easy to buy Mainly talk about Kenwood, a Japanese audio manufacturer, and later in the development of the industry, there are very good results, many machines are praised by audiophiles as artifacts and are still produced ***, However, the function is relatively simple,In order to purify the line,No damage to sound quality,Kenwood's machines generally do not have FM,E-book,**Browsing and other functions,But simple ****,But its sound quality is really quite good,Superior to Sony,iPod However, I personally recommend iAudio 9The price is not high,Easy to buy,The sound quality can also be comparable to the above brands of machines。

It seems that you still don't know about these things, the brands you said are not comparable with domestic products, to give you a ranking in my heart, the world's highest sound quality is Denmark's bo flying saucer. About three thousand,Japan's Jianwu,Sony,South Korea's love of Europe,I won't consider the rest,If you buy I recommend love Europe's enemyi9,This is not expensive,The sound quality is also very good。

The NJB3 is slightly better than the ZEN XTRA, and the equivalent of the ZEN XTRA are the NJB1, NJB2, Rio Karma, B&O UFO, Avery and IFP-59X, Meibo FY500 (SAA7750 core version), and later Kenwood B9, Sony D50. At present, the digital turntable on the market cannot be compared with those antiques, after all, those antiques are the leaders in conventional design, and the modern new digital flavor is too strong.

There are a lot of options on the market, it depends on what you mainly listen to**, budget, etc., if you are interested, you can discuss it.

iAudio is a bit overhyped.

In fact, Sony started as a tape recorder, so until now the audio products are still doing very well.

The S705 is not bad, in fact, Sony's recognized machine with the best sound quality is the A81X

Sony is much better than the Patriot, the two are better than Sony, whether it is sound quality, workmanship, performance, quality and cost performance, Sony is much better than the Patriot. However, the specific conditions are different, and you can choose according to your own needs.

1. Sound quality: Sony's sound quality is recognized as better, and the sound quality of Patriot is average, but the brand and after-sales are more formal. As an international brand, Sony's after-sales service is also guaranteed.

2. Quality: The quality of both is guaranteed, and the after-sales service is also guaranteed. It is relatively durable and has a certain anti-drop function.

3. Cost-effective: Sony** is higher, but the sound quality is better; Although the sound quality of the Patriot is average, it is cheap, and the two are more cost-effective, depending on personal choice. In terms of the appearance of the two, the design of the Patriot is more beautiful and cool, while the Sony is more simple and simple.

Sony's best sound quality, quality, and good cost performance.

Sony is good, but expensive, Patriot is cheap, but rotten.

When it comes to quality, of course, it is Sony, after all, people are the best artifact. If it's cost-effective, it's a patriot. If it's not bad money, it's better to buy Philips. I don't know how to ask.