The reform effect of the Stolypin agrarian reform

Updated on Three rural 2024-06-20
3 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-12

    Answer] C Answer Analysis] Test Question Analysis: Item A is obviously wrong, and the Stolypin reforms ended in failure; Item B is wrong, and its reform has only improved the living standards of some peasants; Item C is correct, and Stolypin's plan for the privatization of land has aroused the enthusiasm of the peasants and promoted the development of the national economy. D. is wrong in saying that Stolypin's reforms were only reforms at a time when the Romanov dynasty was on the verge of its demise, and could not save the crisis of the Tsar's rule.

    Test point: Stolypin reforms.

    Comment: Stolypin led the implementation of Stolypin's land reform. The 1906 decree stipulates that farmers have the right to withdraw from the village community, and that they can at any time identify their share of land as private property in order to establish independent granges (to obtain a share of land within a certain area of the village community) and exclusive farms (land completely separated from the village community), and to support "well-being" farmers to establish independent fan farms and exclusive farms through farmers' banks; In 1911, the Decree promulgated the Land Planning Regulations, stipulating that wherever land planning was carried out, the land of the village community would automatically become private property. A policy of migration to Siberia and other frontiers was pursued.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    Stolypin's reforms One of the last efforts of the Russian Empire to save the day was the reforms of Stolypin, the prime minister of the last Tsar Nicholas II, which are still of scholarly interest today because of the similarities between the forms and methods of reform that China later pursued.

    By 1911, the law on the reform of local self-government in the western provinces of Russia triggered a new political crisis, the Tsar lost mutual trust with Stolypin and the majority of the deputies of the Third State Duma, and his vigorous reform of the political system was strongly resisted by conservatives and vested interests, and on the other hand, his iron-fisted repression of the rebellious opposition aroused hostility from the left and liberals. Stolypin's own assassination also marked the failure of this institutional reform.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Analysis of test questions C: Item A is obviously wrong, and the final collapse of Stolypin's reform ended in failure; Item B is wrong, and its reform has only improved the living standards of some peasants; (c) is correct in saying that Stolypin's land privatization program has mobilized the peasants' enthusiasm for production and promoted the development of the national economy. D. is wrong in saying that Stolypin's reforms were only reforms at the end of the Romanov dynasty, and could not save the Tsar's reign from crisis.

    Comment: Stolypin led the implementation of Stolypin's land reform. The 1906 decree stipulates that farmers have the right to quit the village community, and can at any time determine their share of land as private property in order to establish independent granges (to obtain a share of land within a certain area of the village community) and exclusive farms (land completely separated from the village community), and to support "well-being" farmers to establish independent granges and Duhail Oak Farms through the Farmers' Bank; In 1911, the Decree promulgated the Land Planning Regulations, stipulating that wherever land planning was carried out, the land of the village community would automatically become private property. A policy of migration to Siberia and other frontiers was pursued.

Related questions
10 answers2024-06-20

First and foremost, the policy of eliminating the kulak economy in the past should be changed to a policy of preserving the kulak economy. For small land lessors, the criteria for retaining the amount of land they have retained. The "Land Reform Law" changed the previous policy of confiscating all the property of the landlords, set clear limits on the scope of confiscation, and also stipulated that in the course of land reform, attention must be paid to uniting and protecting the middle peasants, uniting all forces that can be united, and forming a broad united front against feudalism. >>>More

9 answers2024-06-20

Before the reform and opening up in 1979, rural land was collectively owned, according to the collective work of the production team, the division of work, the year-end accounts, agricultural products were distributed by the collective, the peasants had no autonomy in the use of land, and there was often the phenomenon of grinding foreign labor, and the production efficiency was low; >>>More

6 answers2024-06-20

Agrarian reform is basically complete.

Agrarian Reform Movement. >>>More

7 answers2024-06-20

In recent years, the state has always attached great importance to the modernization of rural areas, which has brought earth-shaking changes to my hometown. >>>More

10 answers2024-06-20

I remember that it was allowed to buy and sell land. In the Meiji Restoration in Japan in the 19th century, the four strong feudal clans of Sa Chang and Tohi joined forces. After defeating the shogunate at the Battle of Fushimi and Toba, the last shogun, Tokugawa Yoshiki, was forced to return the throne to Emperor Meiji, and Japan officially entered a capitalist society. >>>More