How do you think about the behavior of family members who dismantle their own express delivery witho

They will be disgusted and feel that they are less concerned about personal privacy, even if it is a family member.

I don't think it's reasonable for a family member to open their own parcel without their consent, because everyone has their own privacy, even their own relatives should respect themselves.

If my family dismantles my courier without my consent, it will make me feel unhappy, because sometimes I have privacy when I buy things by myself, or what others give me is a surprise from others, and my family doesn't feel that way when I dismantle it.

I feel that this behavior is particularly bad, if the things I bought are to be given to friends, so that after the dismantling will cause some trouble, and I will also lose the surprise of opening the express.

I think since it's a family member, it's normal to plug in your own things, but sometimes it's your own privacy, and you should talk to your parents and don't guess.

I think it should be very excessive, because everyone has their own privacy, if you buy some goods, so that parents are very unfazed, it is inevitable to be verbose.

I hate my family's behavior of unpacking my parcel without my consent, because I feel that they don't respect my privacy, so I hate it.

I think it's because they don't have that concept of respecting other people's privacy, they just think that you are their child, that you are their possession.

I'm a very private person, so if my parents or my family members open a package without my consent, I would never allow that to happen.

In fact, I think if it is a courier that I bought myself, it doesn't matter if they dismantle it or not, but if it is an express sent to me by someone else, I don't want them to dismantle it, after all, this involves personal privacy issues.

I said that my courier was actively guessed by my family, so I think if my parents took the initiative to dismantle my courier, I don't think it's okay because I have stated it in advance.

Personally, I don't think this is a disrespectful act of respecting privacy, I definitely can't tolerate this happening to me, I'm a very privacy-conscious person.

I'm disgusted, it's disrespectful to me.

I find it very uncomfortable for my family to open their own parcels without their consent.

I don't feel it, and there won't be anything hidden about what I'm sending home anyway.

Legal basis: Article 253 of the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China Postal workers who open or conceal or destroy mail or telegrams without permission shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention. Whoever commits the crime in the preceding paragraph and steals property shall be convicted in accordance with the provisions of Article 264 of the Rolling Law, and shall be punished with a heavier punishment.

Legal analysis: It is a crime to arbitrarily open someone else's courier without the consent of the person, that is, it violates the privacy of the recipient. Concealing, destroying, or illegally opening other people's letters, violating citizens' right to freedom of communication, and the circumstances are serious, is to be sentenced to up to one year imprisonment or short-term detention.

Postal workers who open, conceal, or destroy mail or telegrams without permission shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or short-term detention. Where property is stolen while committing the crimes in the preceding paragraph, a heavier punishment is to be given upon conviction.

Legal basis: Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 990:Personality rights are rights enjoyed by civil subjects, such as the rights to life, body, health, name, title, portraiture, reputation, honor, and privacy. In addition to the personality rights provided for in the preceding paragraph, natural persons enjoy other personality rights and interests arising from personal freedom and personal dignity.

Article 995:Where personality rights are infringed, the victim has the right to request that the perpetrator bear civil liability in accordance with the provisions of this Law and other laws. The provisions of the statute of limitations do not apply to the victim's right to request cessation of infringement, removal of obstacles, elimination of danger, elimination of impact, restoration of reputation, and formal apology.

Privately dismantling the town potatoes and other people's express delivery may constitute the crime of theft and be investigated for criminal responsibility in accordance with the law.

The act of opening, concealing and destroying other people's express mail without permission seriously endangers the security of the express mail and infringes on the freedom of communication, communication secrets and the legitimate rights and interests of users. Privately opening another person's express mail refers to the act of illegally opening another person's express mail during delivery without the consent of the sender or recipient; Concealment of another person's express mail refers to the act of intercepting and hiding another person's express mail without delivering it to the recipient; Destroying other people's express mail refers to tearing up, annihilating or discarding another person's express mail without authorization, making it impossible for the recipient to receive it, concealing, destroying or illegally opening another person's letter, and violating citizens' right to freedom of communication.

Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China

1) Comply with laws and administrative regulations, and obey supervision;

2) The rights to freedom of speech, publication, assembly, association, procession, or demonstration must not be exercised without the approval of the enforcement organs;

3) Report on their own activities in accordance with the provisions of the enforcement organs;

4) Comply with the regulations of the executive organ on receiving visitors;

5) Leaving the city or county where they reside or relocating shall be reported to the executive authority for approval.

Criminals sentenced to controlled release shall be paid equally for equal work in their work. Article 40: [Release of Controlled Releases at the Completion of the Controlled Release] When the period of controlled release is completed for criminals sentenced to controlled release, the enforcement organs shall immediately announce the release of controlled release to themselves and the people in their units or places of residence. Article 41: [Calculation and Deduction of Controlled Sentences]The period of controlled release is calculated from the date on which the judgment is enforced; Where a person is detained before the judgment is enforced, the sentence is to be reduced by two days for one day of detention.

Article 53: [Payment of Fines]Fines are to be paid in one lump sum or in installments within the time period specified in the judgment. If the payment is not made at the expiration of the time limit, the payment shall be compulsory. Where the fine cannot be paid in full, the people's court shall recover it at any time if it discovers that the person subject to enforcement has property that can be enforced.

Where there is genuine difficulty in making payments due to irresistible disasters or other reasons, upon the people's court's ruling, payment may be postponed, reduced or waived as appropriate.