Did the heavy emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business hinder the development of the

Updated on history 2024-06-14
24 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    The emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business has indeed hindered the development of the budding capitalism, and in the general direction it has already left capitalism with nowhere to develop.

    The emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business have made the market very narrow. At the end of feudal society, there was a large surplus of resources, and the development of productive forces would inevitably lead more people to participate more actively and actively in commodity trading activities to meet their respective needs. In the case of a large accumulation of assets, people naturally want to privately own assets and pursue the maximum profit in economic activities, which is the germ of capitalism.

    The law of the economy itself is regulated by the natural market, at this time, the implementation of heavy agriculture and suppression of business, a bit similar to forcing people to go back to the past, strictly prohibiting people from going to sea without permission, setting up a tax bureau, strictly prohibiting people from exchanging daily necessities and means of production without permission, etc., is it that everyone has to rely on having an acre of land to develop the economy? This set of operations makes people have fewer things to do, and the market has become correspondingly smaller.

    The policy of heavy agriculture and suppression of business will lead to a shortage of labor and no one to promote capitalism. After the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business came out, it was equivalent to laying a net of heaven and earth. With wide checkpoints and tax increases, people engaged in business often take too much risk, and profits are indeed uncertain, and businessmen are really heartbroken.

    At this time, there is less labor force willing to participate in the capitalist economy, and capitalist economic behavior depends on hiring labor to create profits, and there is no way to develop without labor force, which greatly hinders the development of the budding capitalism.

    The policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing business has made people busy hoarding land, and there is a shortage of funds to develop the capitalist economy. The policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce allowed the Jin and Hui merchants to seize the opportunity at that time, and they bought land extensively, used the land as a confidence to put usury, and collected the funds that could be used to the greatest extent. In this case, a large amount of money is absorbed and cannot be converted into capital.

    The shortage of funds, not to mention the hiring of talents to develop the economy, is not sufficient in its own capital, which makes capitalism simply nowhere to develop.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Hinder. And it is a fundamental obstacle to the development of capitalism.

    The core of capitalism is the circulation of commodities, and the policy of suppressing merchants directly lowers the status of merchants, leading people to live in a self-sufficient society.

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    This must have an obstructive effect, because commerce can represent capitalism, so the status of merchants in feudal society is very low.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    Heavy agriculture cannot concentrate land on large-scale industrial infrastructure construction and production, and the materials produced by merchants cannot flow rapidly. Social resources cannot be effectively allocated.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    The status of merchants in ancient China has always been humble, especially politically, but because some merchants had deep pockets, they had a certain status in interpersonal and social terms.

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Answer] A Answer Analysis] Test Question Analysis: "Heavy agriculture and suppression of business" means that the exchange and production of commodities are in a state of repression, and the low degree of exchange means that the intensity of market development is small, and the market is small, and the speed and quantity of commercial capital accumulation are at a low level, and the shortage of capital, and the labor force is solidified in the land, which means the lack of free labor force that is of great significance to the development of capitalism, and the raw materials are objective, not increased or decreased due to the presence or absence of capital, and are fixed and unaffected.

    Test Point: The Emergence of Economic Capitalism in Ancient China and the Policy of "Heavy Agriculture and Suppression of Business" and "Maritime Ban" of "Heavy Agriculture and Suppression of Business".

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    Answer: "Heavy agriculture and suppression of commerce" means that the exchange and production of commodities are in a state of suppression, and a low degree of exchange means that the intensity of market development is small, and the market is small, and the speed and quantity of commercial capital accumulation are at a low level, and there is a shortage of capital, and the labor force is solidified on the land, which means the lack of free labor force that is of great significance to the development of capital and nuclear slippery, and the raw materials exist objectively, and they are not carefully increased or decreased due to the presence or absence of capital.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    It is not because of the emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business. The main reason for the peasant revolt was the unfavorable rule of the rulers, which led to the misery of the common people, and then there was a peasant revolt.

  9. Anonymous users2024-02-03

    The fundamental reason for the peasant uprising was that the feudal landlords occupied land ownership and deprived the peasants of the basic living conditions, so the peasants had to revolt and resist, so most dynasties would initially promulgate the equalization system to meet the needs of the peasants.

  10. Anonymous users2024-02-02

    I don't think that's the reason, the peasant uprisings are because the people can't survive, and the feudal dynasty does nothing, so it happens.

  11. Anonymous users2024-02-01

    Emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce refers to attaching importance to the development of agriculture and restricting the development of handicrafts, industry and commerce. The fundamental reason for implementing the policy of valuing agriculture and suppressing business is to promote agricultural development, ensure the people's living standards, and promote social and economic development.

  12. Anonymous users2024-01-31

    That is, the status of businessmen is even lower than that of peasants, and this is because businessmen value profits, so the status of businessmen is pressed to such a low level, and what they are afraid of is that businessmen will do everything for the sake of profit, so they will implement such a heavy emphasis on agriculture and suppression of businessmen.

  13. Anonymous users2024-01-30

    Suppress the development of commerce and raise the taxes of merchants. Because the foundation of the stability of the ancient dynasty was the peasants, who needed grain, and were afraid that the peasants would go into business.

  14. Anonymous users2024-01-29

    (1) In the early days of feudal society, the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce played a positive role in the development of agriculture and social economy at that time, and in the consolidation of the power of the emerging landlord class (it can be explained by the Shang Dynasty Reform Law: the Shang Dynasty Reform Law actively promoted the policy of agricultural warfare, adopted various means to implement the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce, and encouraged the development of agricultural production, which promoted the continuous enhancement of the economic strength of the Qin State and laid the material foundation for the unification of the six countries by Qin Shi Huang.

    2) It ensured the agricultural labor force and promoted the development of agricultural production, and (3) it was conducive to stabilizing the feudal ruling order and consolidating feudal rule.

    However, the policy of "valuing agriculture and suppressing business" also led to the continuous annexation of land by the landlords and bureaucrats, resulting in a high degree of land concentration, bankrupt and exiled the peasants, which affected the development of agricultural production, intensified class contradictions, and caused peasant uprisings to break out continuously. The landlord bureaucracy was also further corrupted by the frenzied annexation of land.

  15. Anonymous users2024-01-28

    The root cause of the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce was to consolidate the rule and supremacy of the landlord class.

  16. Anonymous users2024-01-27

    Agriculture is the production of the most basic means of subsistence for people, which is directly related to the rise and fall of the country and the livelihood of the people. Feudal states could secure fiscal revenues by imposing a stable land tax. Tying the peasants to the land is conducive to social stability.

    Industry and commerce cannot provide the most basic means of subsistence, and their development will exacerbate the loss of labor from the land, causing social problems. The exchange of commodities is underdeveloped, and it is better to operate shops and workshops than to manage land to ensure a secure livelihood. The fundamental cause is a product of the natural economy, an inevitable product of a low level of productivity.

  17. Anonymous users2024-01-26

    The root cause should be found from the economy, China is a vast country, the Yangtze River and the Yellow River basin formed a fertile soil, making it easier for people to obtain the means of production and living needed for survival from the land, as early as more than 10,000 years ago, in the Yangtze River and Yellow River basin formed an early agricultural civilization. With the advent of iron ox farming and the destruction of the well field system in the Spring and Autumn Period and the Warring States Period, the feudal land ownership system was established, and on this basis, a small peasant economy was formed, and the small peasant economy has always been the economic foundation of the feudal state. The increase in merchants is not conducive to social stability, and the rulers regard them as "people who are not skilled and nomadic people", which is not conducive to strengthening the personal control of the people and political stability.

    So, in the final analysis, the root of the heavy agricultural and commercial suppression lies in the self-sufficient natural economy. As a basic national policy of successive rulers, the fundamental purpose of "valuing agriculture and suppressing commerce" was to consolidate the rule.

  18. Anonymous users2024-01-25

    The fundamental reason is the reflection of the backward and closed natural economy, which is the inevitable product of the low level of social productive forces.

  19. Anonymous users2024-01-24

    China's economy is based on a small-scale peasant economy, that is, a large agricultural country.

  20. Anonymous users2024-01-23

    The economic base determines the superstructure, and China's natural economy determines that the state should implement this policy based on land. At the same time, the state should implement the first-class centralized system, and the heavy agriculture and suppression of business can be a good guarantee of the centralization of power, just imagine, if people do not farm and engage in business, it will inevitably speed up the flow of population, and the concentrated accumulation of wealth, which is not conducive to social stability, and there are contradictions between localities and localities, localities and enterprises, and then affect the centralization of power.

  21. Anonymous users2024-01-22

    What are the reasons for the emphasis on agriculture and the suppression of business?

  22. Anonymous users2024-01-21

    In the final analysis, the adoption of this policy by China's feudal society was determined by its economic foundation. The basis of the economy of the feudal state was a self-sufficient natural economy, and the main sector of this economy was agriculture. Agriculture was the decisive sector of production in ancient times, providing people with the most basic means of subsistence, and the state of agricultural production is directly related to the rise and fall of a country.

    For this reason, successive rulers have grasped agriculture as a fundamental matter, adopted a series of measures to supervise, encourage, and organize agricultural production, and tilted the state's economic policy in a direction conducive to agricultural development. Through the development of agriculture, the feudal state could levy a stable land tax to ensure fiscal revenue, and it was also conducive to social stability, which bound the peasants tightly to the land. The rulers believed that the development of industry and commerce was not as good as the management of land to make life secure, and it would also exacerbate the loss of labor from the land, causing various social problems.

    Therefore, emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce and establishing the country with agriculture have become the traditional governing propositions of China's feudal society.

  23. Anonymous users2024-01-20

    The emperors were all born with mud legs...

    The biggest dependence of feudal society is land!

    Unlike now ...

    And the grain production at that time was too low...

    All go to business, and it is estimated that the whole country will starve to death.

  24. Anonymous users2024-01-19

    Hello. Causes: Direct causes: Commerce and agriculture compete for labor, affecting agricultural production and even endangering feudal rule.

    Purpose: To protect agricultural production and the small peasant economy, to ensure the levy of conscription and land rent, and to consolidate the feudal rule of the towns.

    Impact: Positive role: promote the development of agriculture, maintain feudal rule, and strengthen state control over the economy;

    Negative effect: hindering the development of the budding capitalism.

    I hope I can help you!

Related questions
9 answers2024-06-14

In ancient China, agriculture was important and commerce was suppressed, because this was the guidance of the economic foundation of the feudal dynasties of China, which was dominated by agriculture, and at that time it was a restricted industry and commerce, rewarding farming and warfare.

12 answers2024-06-14

Emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce and developing agriculture promoted the development of handicrafts and commerce. With the continuous development of commerce, during the Song and Song dynasties, merchants broke the boundaries between the city and the city and the restrictions of business hours, please note that the main body here was the merchants, not the government. The Song government's performance was that it no longer strictly regulated trading activities. >>>More

5 answers2024-06-14

1. Positive: In the early days of feudal society, the policy of valuing agriculture and suppressing commerce played a positive role in the development of agriculture and social economy, the maintenance of social stability, and the consolidation of the political power of the emerging landlord class. For example, the Shang Dynasty reformed the law, implemented the policy of emphasizing agriculture and suppressing commerce, and encouraged the development of agricultural production, which promoted the continuous growth of Qin's economic strength and laid the material foundation for the later unification of the six kingdoms by Qin Shi Huang. >>>More

8 answers2024-06-14

1. It was first proposed during the Warring States period. >>>More

10 answers2024-06-14

This idea was first proposed in the Qin Dynasty's Shang Dynasty Reform Law during the Warring States Period, and it should not have been adopted at the end of the Qing Dynasty, because the Qing rulers signed a large number of unequal treaties because of the defeat in the war, the fiscal deficit was serious, and the amount of foreign debts was high, and the Qing rulers wanted to reduce the debt through the merchants' taxes. So lift the policy. >>>More