-
Because the purchasing power of urban people has reached the limit, and it is necessary to transfer the purchasing power of rural areas to the cities, buying a house is the best way. In fact, buying a house at this stage still depends on demand, and it is certainly not suitable to speculate.
-
Teachers in rural areas are weak, the number of schools is not as large as in cities, and teaching equipment is not complete. More and more people are looking for a higher quality of life. Buying a house is suitable.
-
The main reason for advocating farmers to buy a house may be to promote the development of real estate, drive current consumption, and avoid the serious impact caused by the epidemic, which is not conducive to the development of the economy.
-
The main reason is to increase the demand for home purchases, ease the pressure on inventory, and improve market confidence. In other words, it is to be able to sell unfinished commercial housing in the city to release certain economic pressure, but as early as 2016, a large number of third- and fourth-tier cities were attacked.
It has already begun to destock, which consumes a large number of farmers' demand to buy houses in the county, so it is actually very difficult to effectively implement this measure.
In fact, the main purpose is to be able to reduce inventory pressure, increase the demand for housing and re-improve market confidence, and the implementation of the policy is conducive to focusing on such a large group of farmers, which is conducive to improving the enthusiasm of farmers to buy houses in the city, and to a certain extent, it will drive the release of part of the demand. However, it is difficult to assess whether such a policy is effective in practice, because as early as 2015, it began to satisfy new citizens.
The housing system of departure includes reform.
It has long been necessary to speed up the encouragement of migrant workers in the city, and it has become an important measure for qualified migrant workers to buy houses, which shows that as early as 2015, most of the farmers' demand for buying houses has been consumed.
Although this time from the local policy point of view is indeed very preferential, but in fact how many farmers to buy a house, it is difficult to judge, but some experts believe that the demand for farmers to buy a house in the city still exists, the internal driving factors include the pursuit of high-quality educational resources, as well as the demand for better public supporting resources, but from the effect point of view, these actual effects are very limited, because most of the farmers have a fixed place in the countryside, At the same time, the preferential subsidies are difficult to meet the needs of farmers.
All in all, it is actually very difficult to release farmers' demand through these policies and consume inventory of commercial housing through these methods, after all, these policies are not newly proposed, they have been proposed as early as 2015, and at that time a large part of farmers' needs have been consumed.
-
Farmers are encouraged to buy houses in the city, and the main reason for encouraging farmers to buy houses in the city is that the housing market is sluggish and wants the housing market to pick up.
-
First, because there are too many houses in the city, encouraging farmers to go to the city to buy houses can solve the problem of vacant houses. Second, the peasants live in the countryside and their living conditions are not guaranteed, so the peasants are encouraged to go to the city to buy houses.
-
Because now many of the farmers are still living in the countryside, the current real estate market is relatively sluggish, if farmers can be encouraged to buy houses, then it can promote the development of local real estate, can restore the local economic development.
-
At present, the real estate market in the county is under great pressure, and the sluggishness of the real estate market in Laburi County also directly or indirectly affects the local land income. Recently, many localities have introduced policies to encourage peasants to buy houses in the cities. According to incomplete statistics, many places, including Funing County in Jiangsu, Yanji City in Jilin Province, Luju Bureau in Huadian City, Qinglong County in Guizhou, and Ningnan County in Sichuan, have successively issued policies to encourage farmers to buy houses in cities.
It is understood that at the end of 2015, in the context of "destocking" real estate, there was a strategy to encourage farmers to buy houses in the city, accelerate the urbanization of migrant workers, and encourage agricultural transfer population to buy houses. In addition, the party secretary of Shimen County, Changde, Hunan Province, even called on public officials to "buy one set and buy two, and buy two sets and buy three sets" at the real estate exhibition and trade fair. <
Has it been effective to encourage farmers to buy houses in the city in many places? Judging from the current situation, whether it is encouraging peasants to go to the cities to buy houses, or mobilizing public officials, relatives and friends to buy houses, the final effect cannot be seen.
Many places encourage farmers to go to the city to buy houses, are farmers willing?
If you want farmers to buy more houses in the city and boost the real estate market, you must understand the real needs of farmers. For example, the later needs of buying a house, the actual rights and interests of farmers must be properly considered.
Taking the level of rural education as an example, many farmers buy houses in the city not for themselves, but completely for their descendants, hoping that children can get a better environment in education.
The second point is that farmers have been living in the countryside for a long time, and they usually rely on their family's fields to grow grain and vegetables, which can basically solve the problem of eating and drinking. In order to maintain these costs, farmers must also have an income in the city, and if they are unemployed in the city, they can enjoy the same employment support, unemployment insurance, and low-income security as urban residents.
In addition, the rights and interests of rural land contract rights, "homestead land use rights" and "collective income distribution rights" are the lifeblood of peasants, and whether they can continue to be used. <>
Generally speaking, if we want to attract peasants to the cities, we still need to give priority to the rights and interests of peasants.
-
It has not worked, this is not the first time that Luzi Mountain has encouraged farmers to buy houses, and the consumption potential has been consumed in advance. Naturally, I am willing, because the supporting facilities for academic education and medical care are much better than those in rural areas.
-
It didn't work, because the peasants were still reluctant to go to the city to buy a house, because the house in the house was enough for them to live in.
-
It didn't work, because very few peasants went to the city to buy a house, and the peasants were not willing, after all, they were used to life in the countryside.
-
Many places have come out with a variety of policies, just to encourage farmers to go to the city to buy a house, but in fact, sometimes life is not as good as imagined, which is completely a kind of early consumption, is a great pressure, and after buying a house, living in the city means that everything has to be spent, in the countryside can achieve self-sufficiency, but in the city is different, going out means spending money.
Housing loan is an invisible pressure for many young people, and now the biggest purpose of everyone to buy a house is actually to be able to facilitate children's learning or work, if there is no purpose, or have to think clearly, buying a house means voluntarily withdrawing from the homestead, although some local policies can allow farmers to enjoy a reward of 50,000 yuan, and at the same time can have the qualification of a provident fund loan, in the final analysis, if there is no rich property, this is a huge cost, Every month's mortgage can be overwhelming.
Farmers to buy a house in the city actually means to lose everything, lose the rural homestead, lose their own small vegetable field, buy a house in the city can have a lot of expenses, property fees, Duan Yinhui parking fees, gas fees, these are a stable expenditure, and in the countryside in addition to water and electricity bills, there are no other fixed costs, in the city with a green onion want to buy a green onion, but not like in the village has a small yard of their own, grow some vegetables and eat at any time.
Of course, this kind of policy is still more preferential for some people, such as children want to go to school in the county, and parents can find jobs in the county, then it is indeed possible to consider it, buy a house in the city, but if the conditions do not allow, do not go to the hat on your head, consume in advance, after all, buying a house in the city not only has to solve the problem of the house, but also to solve the problem of future income, in fact, living in the city, sometimes there is really no comfort from the countryside, you can go around after eating in the village to chat, But in the city, I don't know who the neighbors are who they are, but considering the level of medical care and education of children, it is indeed more convenient in the city, and there are pros and cons.
-
Many places encourage farmers to go to the city to buy a house, I think this is not the best time to buy a house, we should wait a little longer. Farmers who buy houses and enter Duancheng may need to work part-time to maintain their reputation.
-
According to the needs, if there is a demand, it is definitely appropriate, and after living in the city, it is necessary to have a guarantee in terms of work and daily life.
-
If you have money, you can try it, life is different from the countryside, the countryside is leisurely, and the city is a variety of expenses are relatively large.
-
The effect of encouraging farmers to build a real estate purchase in many places is actually to stabilize the real estate market price, and the real estate market price in many places is currently under the highest work pressure, and the development prospects of farmers after entering the city are actually not very good. Across the country, a number of existing policies have been enacted to encourage farmers to enter the market and buy real estate. According to the information of the Chinese Bureau of Statistics, it can also be found that the ** of houses in many places in China is declining.
The reason why various localities in China will promulgate this current policy is because the prices in many places across the country are at a relatively high position, and many ordinary people in big cities have lost the ability to buy real estate, not only have a large number of peasant households, if this peasant population can buy real estate while selling dates in the city, then the pressure of China's real estate market will be gone.
The rapid development of farmers after entering the big cities is actually not very good, because the regulations for the cultivation of talents in today's big cities are very high, after having new knowledge reserves, it is easier to get more capital, compared with the farmers in fact, there is not much professional knowledge, after joining the big cities can not create a very good use value, so can not get too good development trends.
Since China's reform and opening up, the reason why China has been able to get the current development trend is because the real estate industry has made great contributions, if the price of the real estate market falls to a certain extent, the development of other markets in China will also be affected. The real estate industry is very important for the sustainable development of our country, not only does our country have more than 500 million rural households, although there are not only many job opportunities in the big cities, but these farmers will not have good development prospects after entering the big cities.
-
I think this is not good, because the peasants' academic experience is relatively low, and if they go to the city to buy a house, they may have a lot of pressure and have no way to repay the loan.
-
I think that's a very bad practice; Because it is very unrealistic, if the peasants go to the city to buy a house, they will have a good way to work in the fields, which is more time-consuming.
-
I don't think it's particularly good. This is because such an act causes farmers to lose their jobs and also lose their livelihoods.
-
Now in the first and second tier cities to buy a house nearly a million, so that many people daunting, unable to pay, people often say that the house price is high to the death of the can't afford to buy, although the house price is expensive, but in the big city, many people would rather take a huge loan installment to buy a house, as long as there is a developer to sell the house, it is absolutely very sought-after, people are anxious. Because of the large population and large amount, it is easier to settle down to buy a house in a first- or second-tier city, for the sake of the child's household registration and for their own development prospects, so they grit their teeth and take on loans, but also buy a house, and the house price is also rising again and again, but it is still in short supply.
Whether it is a big city or a small county, the problem now is sustainable development. Large cities have achieved a leading position in urban construction through the development of more than ten years ago, and now many of them are in the stage of urban ecological construction and industrial development. The small county town is relatively old, and the urbanization rate is not high.
At present, the most important thing is to achieve the increase of urbanization rate through real estate development, and also to obtain continuous assistance for development. Therefore, real estate development is the only way for every city, and it is only a matter of time before a small county develops real estate.
After getting married, a large number of rural youths flock to the county seat, will they really live in the county seat? The answer is no, there has been a phenomenon in recent years: some county houses will only be occupied during the Chinese New Year, and most of the time they are empty.
During the Chinese New Year, these people drive back to the countryside in the morning to visit relatives, and drive back to the county seat to sleep in the evening, and the degree of trouble can be imagined. This phenomenon makes the New Year no "New Year's flavor", alienates family affection, and also causes a waste of resources.
-
1. First, second and third-tier cities have serious holidays.
The best young people in the country choose the first city when choosing a job is often a first-tier city, and they hope to settle down and buy a house in ** when they choose a job, so the holiday follows**.
After the housing prices in the first, second and third-tier cities, many people gradually couldn't afford it, so they went to the fourth, fifth and sixth-tier cities, including these counties, of course, the county is the smallest urban unit, and the housing prices are also the last wave, and finally took the last train, the time is about two years from 2018 to 2019, and the housing prices in the county have also risen a wave.
2. Small counties have less pressure and more opportunities, and more and more young people live in small counties.
We have four first-tier cities, but the total population here is only seven or eight thousand people, and China has a population of 1.4 billion, accounting for a little more than 5%, so although these first- and second-tier cities are the first choice of many of our young people, but there are not many who can really stay in it, and many people will eventually return to their hometowns, and the probability of rural young people returning to the countryside is not large, most of them have to choose the county seat in their hometown.
In recent years, there have been many benefits in rural areas, and this year is no exception. A new benefit has been added. This subsidy means that farmers do not need to farm. >>>More
Yes, as long as the homestead is yours, you can tear down the dilapidated house and rebuild it, if the homestead is not your name, you can't.
We will definitely support farmers in farming. In recent years, affected by the epidemic, all walks of life have been greatly hit, and the economic losses caused cannot be calculated numerically. Needless to say, the agricultural and breeding industry has definitely been affected, can it make money in detail? >>>More
Now the old farmers can't do it, and the new farmers can't farm, what can I do? Because most of the people who farm in the countryside are farming, and most of the young people don't know how to farm or how to plant them, we think that young people will probably never farm again in the future. The large farms in the countryside should be one sideAfter all, in view of this development trend, if we do not maintain the development trend of the individual on a large scale, it will definitely make the economic development relatively slow. >>>More
According to the 2005 China Agricultural Development Report released by the Ministry of Agriculture, in 2003, China's total population was 100 million, of which the rural population was 100 million, generally referred to as about 900 million farmers. >>>More