If the earth destroys the United States, they are the sinners, and they are the ones who create cont

Updated on science 2024-06-14
8 answers
  1. Anonymous users2024-02-11

    This statement is too one-sided. Although the United States pursues hegemonist power politics in the world, to be fair, if one day the earth is destroyed due to man-made reasons, this pot cannot be completely counted on the head of the United States, because this is the common responsibility of all mankind, and the United States is only a part of this group.

    A country's foreign policy is determined by its national interests, and the United States is only creating contradictions in the world for the sake of the national interests of the United States, and based on this viewpoint, the United States will not blindly continue to expand the contradictions around the world and move the earth to the point of destruction, because the United States is also a part of the earth, and the destruction of the earth is not in the national interests of the United States. Therefore, the cause of the destruction of the earth cannot be blamed solely on the hegemony of the United States.

    Most of the current assumptions of Earth's destruction are natural causes, such as asteroid impacts, being swallowed by black holes, and so on. If there is a human cause, it is nothing more than war, the destruction of the earth caused by environmental degradation. Let's start with war.

    After the end of World War II, the bipolar confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union has been in the Cold War stage for a long time, even in the most serious situation of the Cuban Missile Crisis, the nuclear war has not broken out, because both the Soviet Union and the United States know that once a nuclear war breaks out is a devastating blow to the entire earth, so the modern world war has always been local, has never developed into a global war, and various countries with nuclear ** have also been using nuclear ** as a strategic deterrent force, and its deterrent is far greater than the actual combat significance. Therefore, once a war breaks out, the United States alone cannot destroy the entire earth, which requires nuclear strikes between various countries. The modernization of developing countries will inevitably cause a series of environmental problems, while the modernization of developed countries has been completed, and the damage to the environment has gradually become smaller, so this pot cannot be fully counted on the head of the United States, which is also a problem that people around the world need to face together.

  2. Anonymous users2024-02-10

    Right; Why did the US imperialists always explore Mars, and even sent an advance probe to go outside the solar system, it is this sinner who is ready to find a foothold for the destruction of the earth, and the earth will be destroyed if it is gone!

  3. Anonymous users2024-02-09

    Yes, the principal offender should bear the responsibility of all the injured.

  4. Anonymous users2024-02-08

    If the United States is destroyed on the day of destruction, then the United States is not necessarily completely a sinner, American hegemonism wants to rule the world, it is engaged in disputes everywhere for hegemony, if the earth is destroyed, it itself is still alive, it is a sinner.

  5. Anonymous users2024-02-07

    It's all about resources, survival of the fittest......

  6. Anonymous users2024-02-06

    Without the United States, the "world policeman," the world may be even more chaotic, and a new world war may break out.

  7. Anonymous users2024-02-05

    That's right, you're funny! What is the language of the United States in short? Was the American ethnicity once white? Ridiculous, don't ask fearless questions with your stupid thinking.

  8. Anonymous users2024-02-04

    If you want to destroy a country, you must first destroy their history; If you want to destroy a people, you must first destroy their culture.

    This sentence was first said by the Qing Dynasty scholar Gong Zizhen.

    It mainly reflects the primacy of the influence of ideology and culture on a country and a nation, and if you want a country to perish, you must first let the country have no history and culture as support; If you want to destroy a nation, the most important thing is to make the nation have no cultural ideas. The support point for the prosperity of a country and a nation is not money and power but the history and culture they have, and by comparing the gains and losses of history, they can always spur themselves on, so that the country can develop, and learning new culture only makes the country develop better. Poverty is not terrible, it is terrible to have no mind!

    The Chinese nation has always been a nation that attaches great importance to history, and this is a very important cultural tradition for us. Qing Dynasty Gong Zizhen said in "The Sequel to Ding'an": "If you want to know the road, you must first go to history.

    To destroy the country of people, we must first go to the history of Tongqi. "To understand history is to understand the great road of the world; Only by grasping historiography can we grasp the laws of society. The first way for a nation to perish is to let its historical outlook die out – trampling on national history, deconstructing national culture, purifying national self-confidence, and destroying national identity.

    Of course, history will not completely repeat the old path, but the future will inevitably continue to follow the track of history. We can continue to build better new tracks and drive faster new cars, but we can't derail and stumble in a dangerous wasteland.

    Inherit the past and face the future; Based on the contemporary, we respect the past and the present. The Chinese nation has come together on a historical car, and it will also gallop in a future where the car is on the same track and has the same heart and morality.

Related questions
12 answers2024-06-14

The earth will not destroy people, people will be destroyed, the earth's environment will eventually be bad enough to destroy human beings, and then the earth will enter the next cycle, a long recovery cycle, this cycle can be tens of millions or even hundreds of millions of years, the earth's ecology will return to its original state, the earth's environment will once again be due to the vicissitudes of the orogenic movement, new life will begin to be born, from low to high, into a long cycle of life evolution, hundreds of millions of years later, human beings who have evolved to reach the brain begin to appear, and then human society has entered a period of rapid development. Human beings have developed civilization to an unprecedented height in just a few thousand years, but this civilization has entered a period of rapid deterioration at the expense of the environment, climate and resources, and finally the earth's resources are depleted, the earth's environment and climate are extremely harsh, the earth collapses, and human beings are destroyed. The Earth has entered the next cycle, a long cycle of self-healing.... … >>>More

5 answers2024-06-14

Earth destruction refers to the phenomenon that the earth is shattered by the impact of other stars, or its own internal ** (such as a large number of high-energy bombs**), or it is attracted to other stars and swallowed. It is the ultimate destruction of all living things on earth. >>>More

20 answers2024-06-14

There is no connection between the two, and the heating of the earth is a matter of sunlight intensity.

12 answers2024-06-14

No way, during the Cold War, the United States and the Soviet Union each had 6,000 nuclear warheads, and the scope of the nuclear bomb attack was not large, Hiroshima and Nagasaki were both very small cities, and these more than 10,000 nuclear bombs may not necessarily cover a country, let alone the world.

10 answers2024-06-14

Following your question, I think you would love to destroy the Earth! Is your current situation not very satisfactory?! >>>More