Rural women can t give birth to boys and continue to give birth, so pitiful, how many are the heads

Without this statement, it is the same for both boys and girls. Now that the gap between urban and rural development is getting smaller and smaller, there are more and more opportunities for people in the village to get in touch with the outside world, and the concept of "preference for sons over women" in rural areas has fallen off the altar. First, boys and girls are the same, and people's ideas have become more open.

The concept of "preference for sons over daughters" has existed since ancient times, and most of the families used to need labor and work in the fields, and ** conscription also requires men, so it is very important for a family to have a boy. Later, with the founding of New China, the vigorous propaganda and the improvement of the education system, people accepted more and more new knowledge and became more and more open-minded, so this changed many people's concept of "preference for sons".

Second, for today's people, the cost of having a boy is too high. Although it costs about the same to have a boy or a girl in the early stages, when the boy grows up, he has to marry a wife and have children. Now marrying ** is too high, and it is a car, a house, money, and gold at every turn, and the cost is too high.

The hard-earned savings of the people in the village are fleeting, but giving birth to a girl is different, at least it doesn't need to be such a high cost. In today's society, there are more men and fewer women, and the cost of giving birth to a boy is really too high.

Third, girls are more warm-hearted and more caring. It is said that "the daughter is the mother's little padded jacket", the boy is rough, not as careful as the girl, and speaks softly and slowly. Although it is said that raising children to prevent old age, there are a few who can really take care of their elderly parents, and boys are boys after all.

Now a lot of news exposes bad news such as sons and daughters-in-law who are not good to their parents. But girls are different, they are more thoughtful, more considerate of their parents, and more able to take care of their parents.

In short, the current society has changed, people are no longer entangled in giving birth to a boy or a girl, and the old concept of "preference for sons over daughters" has increasingly fallen off the altar. The living conditions in the countryside are getting better and better, and boys and girls are the same, they are all their own children, so why bother with which one is good and which one is bad? As long as the family is together and the beauty is healthy, it is good to enjoy the happiness of the collapsed pants.

This is a bit absolute, in fact, the daughter is the little padded jacket of the parents, especially when there are many women, then the second half of her life is very good, because the daughter is more careful, will take care of her parents, and will also make him better to live a better life.

Hello, I'm glad for your question, not necessarily, we generally like daughters now, and we're very happy to have a daughter.

Yes, and it's very common, why are there still people in the countryside who are desperately trying to have a baby in order to have a boy? There are mainly the following reasons:

Raising children to prevent old ageIn the concept of rural people, raising children to prevent old age. This concept has been passed down for a long time, and the old man believes that in order to provide for his old age, he must have a son. So in the countryside, some families even have seven or eight children in order to have a son.

I never think about whether adopting a child is really a scumbag that can prevent old age. No matter how good your daughter is, she will eventually become someone else's family, and she can't be relied on anyway. If you don't have a son, it means that your old age will be particularly bleak.

Therefore, they must have a son when they have children in the future, and the more sons the better, which means that their lives will be happier and happier in the future. And some old people know that they have to rely on their sons to support them when they are old, so they have been very lenient in educating their sons since they were young. Although raising children in the countryside is not the most useful way to provide for the elderly.

And it is not uncommon for sons not to support their parents for the elderly, but every parent thinks that their son will not be an unfilial son. So no matter what other people's children are, their own son must be the best, so the enthusiasm for having a son has never weakened.

SuccessionThe reason why rural people want to have sons so much is because sons can carry on the lineage. Now because of the ratio of men and women, many men cannot marry wives, let alone inherit their ancestors. That is to say, having a son does not completely guarantee this **, it can be passed on.

Even so, it will not weaken the idea that rural people want to have sons. Because the son married a wife, the parents thought that it was very possible, and it could be changed through hard work. But if they give birth to a daughter, after the daughter gets married, the child born is also someone else's family, not their own.

Then my own generation will be destroyed in my own hands, and the old people will feel sorry for their ancestors. Therefore, you must have a son, otherwise you will feel that life has lost its backbone. At the level of the meaning of life, there is not much meaning for the existence of rural people, and this is the most important thing.

Nowadays, there are many rural areas who are still desperately trying to have a child in order to have a boy, and some have three daughters in front of them, in order to want a son to continue to have four children.

Yes, but there are very few early bridges, Lu Dameng is now in the countryside people are slowly changing their thinking, and even many people go to the city to work for their children with their families, and the pressure is also very great, and this kind of thinking has quietly disappeared.

Yes, the preference for sons over daughters is still relatively serious in many places, and there will be many people who are desperate to have sons.

On the one hand, due to the influence of economic conditions, the cost of training if you have a son is much higher than that of a girl, and boys want to be more productive, and they will have to buy a house for their children and marry a daughter-in-law in the future, the cost is quite high.

The reason why I dare not give birth is because I can't afford to raise it, and now the economic and social development, the burden of getting married and having children in the countryside is very heavy, and the bride price and buying a car and a house cannot be achieved by young people alone, and parents need to bear part of it, and a son is enough to bear it, so I dare not have more children.

Because people's quality of life has improved now, their sons ask for a lot of bride price for marrying a daughter-in-law, and they are reluctant to have a son, because they have to prepare a bride price, prepare a house, and prepare a car for him to get married, and they don't want to reduce their living standards because of this.

Because the pressure of having a son in the countryside is very great now, it is necessary to consider that the son will buy a house for him when he grows up, and the bride price for marriage will also be a lot, so now rural people dare not have more sons.

Because after giving birth to a son, they need to marry a daughter-in-law, and when they marry a daughter-in-law, they will ask for a lot of bride price, and the income of the peasants is very small, and the more sons they have, the higher the bride price.

Because now I have to buy a house and a car to give birth to a son, and bear huge economic pressure, I dare not have more sons.

Summary. Hello dear. This statement is completely incorrect, no one is inferior to anyone. Whether or not they can have children is not the basis for judging the status of women at all.

If a woman does not give birth to a child, is she inferior to the woman who gave birth to a child?

Hello dear. This statement is completely incorrect, no one is inferior to anyone. Whether or not they can have children is not the basis for judging the status of women at all.

A woman's responsibility is not to have children, nor to take care of the family, a woman's only responsibility is to take care of herself and not to make herself sad. Having a baby is just a choice for women, and women can choose to have children or not to have children. It's the same with whether you can have children or not, women are not accessories to anyone, and they don't need to rely on having children to cash out their value.

Dear, don't discriminate against women because you can't have children, and don't blame yourself for not being able to have children.