The slogan of the debate is whether a strict teacher produces a high apprentice or a loving teacher

Thank you, Chairman, the opponent's defense friend is a strict teacher, and we cannot deny this point of view, but in today's 21 society, everyone's open-mindedness is no longer what it was thousands of years ago. Now the emphasis is on democracy and equality between teachers and classmates, not to mention that today's students are naughty and difficult to teach, and strictness will only make the effect counterproductive. Yan gave the students a feeling of disgust, as if they were suppressed everywhere to prevent them from having fun and not letting them relax.

However, the effect of a teacher is very different in comparison. Who likes a teacher to be very harsh on themselves? I'm afraid not, even if you know that the other party is good to you.

Now the rebellious psychology of teenagers is very serious, if you want him to do this, he will say that, then you treat them strictly, will they really understand the teacher? Do you really listen to the teacher and think that the teacher is right? Does it really help them?

Of course not. In today's society, the teacher is much better than the strict teacher, because they will be considerate and forgive the student, so the student's rebellious psychology will not be so serious. Man is also an animal, will he be good to you if you are indifferent to him?

However, a benevolent teacher can influence them, and anyone has feelings, and who can bully or deceive a teacher who is so good to them? Won't their conscience be unhappy? If you are good to the students, the students will naturally know and feel it, and they will repay the teachers and go back to study hard.

In contrast, isn't it easier for a Ci Shi to be a high disciple than a Yan Shi?

can't get out, and the apprentices are basically self-taught.

I have seen a game as a judge before is this topic, and I have a little bit of my own opinion on this topic, so I will simply help you analyze the entry point of this debate first of all, the definition must be accurate, what is "strict teacher", what is "high apprentice", because in the process of the competition, it is easy for both sides to be entangled in the definition of the problem and argue repeatedly, such a competition is not interesting, and can not play deep, especially this debate, because the debate of the times should have the significance of the times, so it is very easy Let the two sides argue endlessly on the definition, we must avoid the secondly, it is a logical problem, the positive side "strict teacher produces a high apprentice", the opposite side is "strict teacher may not produce a high apprentice", that is to say, this is an either/or debate, the positive side wants to prove his point of view, it is necessary to refine the definition of "strict teacher" and "high apprentice", so that it can be beaten; The opposite side is just the opposite, and it is enough to cite an example that the other side cannot refute that "the strict master did not produce a high disciple." This is the main battlefield where the two sides should be, rather than simply entangled in the definition of the end, that is, the positive and negative sides fill in their own existing ideological framework, think more about the problem, there are too many such examples So don't worry about the two sides have nothing to say Carefully search for the materials at hand, think deeply, and you will inevitably be able to play the level, as for writing the defense, it is the work of the four people in the debate team, everyone has to brainstorm, of course, this is also a process of improvement, relying on the defense written by others, you will not have a deep understanding at the same time, There will be no improvement in the debate, it will not be beneficial, so I hope you use your brain, and I hope that so many words of mine can help you (Uihou offers love from the Fishbone team