Is it better to have public ownership or private ownership, public ownership or private ownership, w

Private ownership forms a private monopoly and monopolizes social wealth in the hands of a few, and this is the emergence of exploitation, and together with exploitation, oppression. Politics serves the economy, and the economy is in the hands of a few, so politics naturally has to maintain a social order that is beneficial to a few. True public ownership, the elimination of the right to serve a few, and the social economy is no longer in the hands of a few, and the political and economic monopolization is no longer monopolized by a few, is the public ownership advocated by Marx.

Private monopoly is not limited to social wealth, because social wealth is monopolized in the hands of a small number of people, resulting in advanced science and technology, talent and other resources are also monopolized by a small number of people, and cannot create more wealth for the whole society. It is not conducive to reflecting social fairness, but also not conducive to the improvement of the level of productivity. This is why it is said that private ownership is the root of all evil.

Due to the existence of private ownership, although the electoral mechanism and other human rights mechanisms have become more scientific, the political discourse is actually in the hands of a few.

In a truly public-owned society, the people are the masters of the country politically, and this is because the economic system has truly developed into a relatively comprehensive public ownership system.

Private ownership is good for individuals.

Public ownership is good for the country.

Each has its own good, and I personally think that private ownership is better.

The public has the power of the state, and the private division of the power of the state.

Public ownershipIt is not possible to make a simplistic conclusion about which one is more efficient, or private ownership。The reality of the situation is complex, ownership.

It is only an important factor affecting efficiency, but it is not the only factor, and a single conclusion cannot be drawn based on a certain phenomenon in reality. Public and private ownership can be both efficient and inefficient.

Public ownership and private ownership have their own strengths and weaknesses. In some fields, especially in the field of public material combustion, public ownership has more advantages, and its scope of application will be greater. In terms of coordinating social and economic interests, public ownership is more capable of forming a harmonious relationship of interests in society.

The choice of public ownership as the main body is determined by our value goals:

Public ownership can lay the institutional foundation for the formation of equal relations of economic interests between people, so as to build harmonious social relations for the whole society.

Provides a basic guarantee. The harmony of the relationship of interests can arouse the enthusiasm of the majority of the people for production and give a more adequate impetus to the development of the productive forces as a whole.

Does efficiency refer to productivity or execution?

Legal Analysis: The economy of private ownership is an economy in which ownership belongs to individuals; The public-owned economy is an economy that belongs to the public and the public; The non-public economy refers to an economy that is not shared by the public.

Legal basis: Civil Procedure Law of the People's Republic of China

Article 76: Parties may apply to the people's court for an evaluation on specialized issues of ascertaining facts. Where the parties apply for an appraisal, the parties are to negotiate to determine a qualified evaluator; and where negotiation fails, the people's court is to appoint one. Where the parties have not applied for an evaluation, and the people's court finds that an evaluation is necessary for a specialized issue, it shall retain a qualified evaluator to conduct the evaluation.

Article 77: Evaluators have the right to learn about the case materials needed to conduct evaluations, and when necessary, may question parties and witnesses. The evaluator shall submit a written evaluation opinion and sign or affix a seal to the appraisal document.

Article 78: Where parties have objections to an evaluation opinion or the people's court finds that it is necessary for an evaluator to appear in court, the evaluator shall appear in court to testify. Where upon notice from the people's court, the evaluator refuses to appear in court to testify, the evaluation opinion must not be the basis for determining the facts; The party who paid the appraisal fee may request a refund of the appraisal fee.

Article 79: Parties may apply to the people's court to notify persons with specialized knowledge to appear in court and submit opinions on evaluation opinions or professional issues made by evaluators.

Article 80: In the inquest of physical evidence or at the scene, the inquest person must present the people's court's identification, and invite the local basic-level organization or the party's unit to send someone to participate. The parties or their adult family members shall be present, and where they refuse to appear, it does not impact the conduct of the inquest. Relevant units and individuals have the obligation to protect the scene and assist in the inquest work on the basis of the notice of the people's court.

The inquest personnel shall make a record of the circumstances and results of the inquest, and the inquest personnel, the parties, and the invited participants shall sign or affix a seal.