Will the discipline inspection ask you to write a review?

This depends on whether you are satisfied with what you write, and then it depends on whether your question is still there, if not, you will not ask again. If I find something else, I'm sure I'll ask you more. Of course, if it wasn't a big deal, I wouldn't ask again.

If you are asked to write a review, you can write it well, and I will definitely talk to you after writing a review.

The main thing for you to write a review is to make you correctly recognize the mistakes you have made, and if you make a big mistake, you may be asked again.

Generally speaking, it depends on the situation, and if the situation is simple, I generally like to review and will not ask.

If the Commission for Discipline Inspection asks you to write a review, you have to write a review carefully, and then take the initiative to hand it in, and it is possible that it will come to you for questioning!

Will the discipline inspection ask you to write a review? Xie will not ask any more questions, but will let you read it aloud at the branch meeting.

Maybe not for the sake of maybe both review and reply accordingly, both are possible.

If you write a check, if there is no problem with the check, it will definitely not be in Wanhua, and if there is a problem with the check, you may still be asking you.

Will the discipline inspection ask you to write a review? I think if you are asked to write, you will write everything clearly, everything will be written, he will ask you something, and you will be truthful.

You know this question best, first of all, it depends on whether the inspection you wrote can pass the discipline inspection, if the discipline inspection fails, then it will definitely ask you again.

Hello friend, this is not necessarily, depending on what mistakes you make, be prepared, thank you.

Hello. Of course, there will be questions and there will be a review, which is a normal process, of course, to confirm the situation.

If the discipline inspection writes a review, he may see your review and ask you again in the future, which is also very normal.

If the Commission for Discipline Inspection asks me to write a review, it means that the problem has been almost dealt with.

This depends on whether your case is serious or not, and if it is serious, you will be questioned again.

In general, this must be a question of the culture of painting and writing reviews at all.

Half of them wrote a review and won't look for you again, some of them are profound.

Legal analysis: The commission requires the writing of a review letter, which is generally a disciplinary violation that has been verified.

Legal basis: "Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China" Article 63: Where relevant personnel violate the provisions of this Law by exhibiting any of the following conduct, their units, competent departments, higher-level organs, or Supervision Organs are to order corrections and give sanctions in accordance with law:

1) Refusing to provide relevant materials as required, refusing or obstructing the implementation of investigative measures, or otherwise refusing to cooperate with the Supervision Organs' investigation;

2) Providing false information to cover up the truth;

3) Collusion of confessions or fabrication, concealment, or destruction of evidence;

4) Preventing others from exposing or reporting or providing evidence;

5) Other conduct violating the provisions of this Law, where the circumstances are serious.

The Commission for Discipline Inspection shall complete the handling of cases within 90 days. According to Article 28 of the Rules for the Supervision and Enforcement of Discipline by the Discipline Inspection Organs of the Communist Party of China, the review time shall not exceed 90 days.

In special circumstances, with the approval of the discipline inspection organ at the level above, it may be extended once, and the extension period must not exceed 90 days. According to the "Provisions of the Discipline Inspection Commission of the Communist Party of China on the Working Procedures for the Trial of Cases of Party Member Violations of Discipline": 1. Article 9: After the trial departments of discipline inspection commissions at all levels accept the case, they shall promptly designate an undertaker to handle it.

Except for cases where the circumstances are simple, it should generally be handled by two people, and in other major and complicated cases, a deliberative group of two or more people should be formed to handle it, and one of them should be designated to preside over it. 2. Article 10: The trial of cases should be conducted in accordance with the requirements of clear facts, conclusive evidence, accurate characterization, proper handling, and complete formalities.

Article 22 of the Regulations of the Communist Party of China on the Work of Case Inspection by Discipline Inspection Organs: Where it is necessary to file a case, a report on the filing and approval of the case should be written, with the reporting materials and a report on the preliminary verification attached, and submitted for examination and approval in accordance with the scope of authority for case filing and approval. The time limit for case filing and approval must not exceed one month. In cases that have been approved for filing, the discipline inspection organs shall report to the organization department of the Party committee at the same level.

Article 25: At the beginning of the investigation, under normal circumstances, the investigation team should talk with the Party organization of the unit to which the person being investigated belongs, announce the decision to file the case and the discipline that should be observed, and require them to correctly handle the organizational investigation, and during the investigation, should earnestly listen to the statements and opinions of the person being investigated, and do a good job of ideological education. Article 26: When the investigation team finds that the Party member cadre under investigation has truly committed serious mistakes and is no longer fit to hold their current position or obstructed the investigation of the case, it may recommend that they be suspended from their posts for inspection. Where the suspension from internal Party positions is the Party committee's approval of Lijing's return, the Party committee is to decide on the suspension for inspection; Where the case is directly filed by the discipline inspection organs, the suspension for inspection is to be decided by the discipline inspection organs after soliciting the opinions of the Party committee at the same level.

The handling methods after the Commission for Discipline Inspection writes the review letter are as follows:

1. Under normal circumstances, after the review is written, it will be recorded in the file for future assessment and supervision.

2. If a mistake is made that leads to the need to write a review, then the mistake should not be serious, otherwise the review will be made public or handed over to the judicial authorities for processing.

3. If the reason for writing the review is due to negligence in the work, it may be reported internally, but it will not be recorded in the file.

4. If the reason for writing the review is that a large number of people report and complain due to failures and mistakes, then they may be punished by a certain source, such as apologies, demotions, etc.

Significance of the review:

It is mainly through self-reflection and self-criticism to make up for one's own shortcomings in order to promote one's own growth and improvement. Specifically, review allows us to identify our own mistakes and shortcomings: by examining our actions, words, or ways of thinking, we can identify problems or mistakes that we may have and correct them.

Improve self-awareness and self-management: Through review, we can understand ourselves more deeply, identify our emotions, motivations and values, and have better control and management of our emotions and behaviors. <>

The Economic Commission's request to write a review is generally a violation of discipline that has already been verified.

Article 63 of the Supervision Law of the People's Republic of China: Where relevant personnel violate the provisions of this Law by committing any of the following conduct, their unit, the competent department, the organ at the level above, or the Supervision Organ are to order corrections and give sanctions in accordance with law:

1) Refusing to provide relevant materials as required, refusing or obstructing the implementation of investigative measures, or otherwise refusing to cooperate with the Supervision Organs' investigation;

2) Providing false information to cover up the truth;

3) Collusion of confessions or fabrication, concealment, or destruction of evidence;

4) Preventing others from exposing or reporting or providing evidence;

5) Other conduct violating the provisions of this Law, where the circumstances are serious.