My mother in law is not in good health and can t take care of her children, should she give her gran

My mother-in-law is not in good health and can't take care of the children, so she should give her daughter-in-law and grandson living expenses, my opinion is very clear, it shouldn't.

It is a love duty for a mother-in-law to help take care of the children, and it is a duty not to help. What's more, it's because the mother-in-law is not in good health and can't take the child.

For children, parents have the obligation to raise their children, but grandmothers do not. Legally speaking, mother-in-law with grandchildren has no such obligation, and it is her duty to bring it with affection, not to mention that she can't take her children because of physical reasons. You can't ask your mother-in-law to pay child support because she can't bring her grandchildren.

There is no reason for this, the mother-in-law has brought up her own children, married a wife and had children, and her duties have been completed. Whoever has a child, if there are difficulties to overcome by themselves, you must not complain that your mother-in-law does not take the child, let alone ask your mother-in-law to pay child support, it will be a big mistake!

People should be content and happy, mother-in-law is not in good health, you don't need to take care of you, you should feel lucky.

The mother-in-law is the grandmother of the grandson, not the parents of the grandson, and when the parents of the child are alive, there is no obligation to educate and raise the grandson, and naturally there is no obligation to give the grandson living expenses. <>

As for the actual life, some in-laws give their sons and wives an appropriate amount of monetary subsidies, which is an appropriate amount of financial subsidies voluntarily given by the grandparents of the older generation out of family care, which is not an obligation under the law, and the two should not be confused.

is still the same sentence, live your own life, raise your own children, don't push the responsibility and obligation of raising and taking care of children to your in-laws, and put it on your grandparents. Emotionally, the mother-in-law did not want to, but physically did not allow it. Then, your own children figure it out for themselves.

The health of the elderly is not good, and a family should take into account its own children, as well as the elderly. You don't talk about how to take care of the elderly, but think about letting the elderly bear the living expenses of your children, you think too much. <

It's not easy for the old man to raise your husband hard, so don't be too demanding. Everyone has their own children, who will all grow old, and they should all think differently.

Home and everything is prosperous.

Be content and happy, and I wish you happiness!

I don't think it's necessary to give living expenses to your grandson and daughter-in-law, because the child belongs to your son and daughter-in-law, not yours, and you don't have this obligation.

No, the mother-in-law has no obligation to manage the lives of her grandson and daughter-in-law, not to mention that the mother-in-law's life is not good, and she has no economy.

Yes, if the mother-in-law has a good financial situation, the daughter-in-law takes care of the children full-time, and the son is not competitive enough to support the family, and the mother-in-law cannot take care of the children, she should give financial help.

Of course not, because the mother-in-law is not obliged to help her daughter-in-law with the children, and the mother-in-law also has the right to enjoy her own life.

No, because the mother-in-law has no obligation to take care of her grandson and daughter-in-law, taking care of it is love, and not taking care of it is duty.

This is not necessarily, if the mother-in-law has the financial ability to help her son, if she does not have the financial ability, there is no need to give, because it is not the mother-in-law's obligation, the child belongs to both of your husband and wife, not the mother-in-law's, and her responsibility has been fulfilled.

I think it depends on yourself, it doesn't matter if you give it or not, and your daughter-in-law also has her own job, so she can't always rely on her elders to live.

If a mother-in-law gives her daughter-in-law a child, should she give money?

Hello, according to the teacher's analysis, in fact, in this case, I don't think there is a need to give, after all, that is her grandson, and now most of the candidates are single-parent families, there is such a child, your mother-in-law in the future life, ordinary life is very interesting, can accompany them, although now many people for their own face or feel unhappy, since the mother-in-law brings the child to herself, you can buy her some clothes, or what she usually likes to eat, Or give him a little money, but under normal circumstances, such a mother-in-law will not take his money, so everyone is a family, so the teacher thinks it doesn't matter? If you feel that you don't want to go, you can buy some clothes for her, which is more practical, because if you give money, he will not accept it.

Now the model of many families is like this, the daughter-in-law goes back to work after giving birth, and the mother-in-law takes care of the children at home to solve the family's worries, but is it the mother-in-law who should take the children? If a mother-in-law who doesn't have children, can't she get filial piety from her daughter-in-law? Netizen Xiaoyi shared her story with me, should my mother-in-law take her grandson?

The old man is wronged, is it really her fault not to take the child?

There is an old man who lives alone next to Xiaoyi's house, the old lady is over 80 years old, and she lives in the house alone, and she usually cooks and buys food by herself, and no one has ever seen her. Although there is nothing wrong with the body, it is still a little difficult to bear the burden of your own life.

Xiaoyi thought at first that the old lady was a lonely old man, with no children and no daughters, but later after listening to the chats of the neighbors, she learned that the old man had a son, but because after the birth of his grandson, the old man was unwilling to help his daughter-in-law take his grandson, so he quarreled with his daughter-in-law many times and had a disagreement.

Later, the child gradually grew up, and the old man gradually got old and hungry, after being often instigated by his daughter-in-law, the old man's son came less and less, and finally after the old man's wife died, the son never came again, but just fixed some living expenses for the old man every month to maintain the daily expenses of the old man. Now that his grandson has grown up, the old man Zheng Weiyu has not seen it a few times. The old man is wronged, is it really her fault not to take the child?

Xiaoyi sighed when she heard this, the birth of her grandson was originally a matter of the child's parents, what does it have to do with the child's grandmother? It is a love to help you take care of the children, and it is the duty not to help you take care of the children, and it is not a mandatory thing, how can the children of the elderly do this?

Mother-in-law does not bring grandchildren, and daughter-in-law does not have a mandatory obligation of maintenance in the legal sense.

The supporter must not refuse to perform the obligation of support on the grounds of renunciation of inheritance rights or other reasons. If the supporter fails to perform the maintenance obligation, the elderly person has the right to demand that the supporter pay alimony. The caregiver shall not require the elderly to undertake work beyond their means.

With the consent of the older person, an agreement may be entered into between the supporters on the performance of the maintenance obligation. The content of the maintenance agreement must not contravene the provisions of the law and the wishes of the elderly. Basic-level mass autonomous organizations, organizations for the elderly, or the unit to which the supporter belongs supervises the performance of the agreement.

Elderly care for the elderly is based on the home, and family members should respect, care for and care for the elderly. The supporter shall fulfill the obligation to provide financial support, daily care and spiritual comfort to the elderly, and take care of the special needs of the elderly. The spouse of the supporter shall assist the supporter in fulfilling the maintenance obligation.

The caregiver shall ensure that the sick elderly receive timely ** and care. For the elderly who have financial difficulties, medical expenses shall be provided. For the elderly who are unable to take care of themselves, the caregiver shall bear the responsibility of care.

Where they cannot take care of them in person, they may entrust others or elderly care establishments to take care of them in accordance with the wishes of the elderly.

Supporters shall make proper arrangements for the housing of the elderly, and must not force the elderly to live in or move to houses with poor conditions. Children or other relatives must not encroach on the housing owned or rented by the elderly, and must not change the property rights or lease relationship without authorization. The caregiver has the obligation to maintain the housing owned by the elderly.

Civil Code of the People's Republic of China

Article 1067:Where parents do not perform their obligation to support them, minor children or adult children who are unable to live independently have the right to demand that their parents pay child support.

Parents who fail to fulfill their obligation to support their adult children, or who lack the ability to work or who have difficulties in living, have the right to demand maintenance from their adult children. Article 1069:Children shall respect their parents' marital rights and must not interfere with their parents' divorce, remarriage, or post-marital life. A child's obligation to support his or her parents does not end when there is a change in the marital relationship between the parents.

Article 1074:Grandparents who can afford it have an obligation to support their minor grandchildren whose parents have died or whose parents are unable to support them.

Grandchildren who can afford it have the obligation to support their grandparents who have died or whose children are unable to support them.

According to China's Marriage Law and the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly, children have the obligation to support and support their elderly and needy parents. However, the law does not stipulate that children must bring grandchildren for their parents or pay for grandchildren. Therefore, it is up to the family members to decide whether to bring grandchildren to the elderly and whether to pay the grandchildren fee and to abide by the consultations and agreements within the family.

Under China's Marriage Law and the Law on the Protection of the Rights and Interests of the Elderly, children have the obligation to support and support their elderly and needy parents, but the law does not require children to take care of their grandchildren or pay for their grandchildren. Therefore, there is some controversy over Li's request for Yao to pay 100,000 yuan in economic compensation.

For this case, the specific verdict needs to be determined in accordance with local laws and the judgment of the referee. However, in general, Yao did not reach a written agreement with Li and agreed to pay remuneration during the period of taking care of the child, and Li's taking care of the child on his behalf was not out of politeness and habit, so it was unreasonable to ask Yao for financial compensation.

If the case is further tried, it may also be necessary to consider factors such as whether Li has taken care of the child for too long and whether Yao has fulfilled his responsibility to take care of the child. In any case, when it comes to the relationship between mother-in-law and daughter-in-law, you should try your best to maintain mutual understanding, communication, and family happiness as the primary goal.

Parents have a legal obligation to support their children, but grandparents do not. Providing material help is an obligation, not an obligation.

Isn't this question inexplicable? It should be that your mother-in-law brought you a child, and people asked you to bring Sun Fei. The law does not stipulate that your mother-in-law must give you a child, so why should you ask someone to take a grandchild?

The mother-in-law does not take care of the grandson, and the son and daughter-in-law have no right to ask the mother-in-law for the grandchild.

The Civil Code stipulates that parents have a legal obligation to support their children, while grandparents have no legal obligation to support their grandchildren. No one has the right to force it. Unless the child has passed away, the remaining parent is raising the child alone, and the financial ability to live is insufficient, and he or she can ask his grandfather or grandmother to help take care of him or give him some financial support.